This statement prompts these questions in my mind:

1. Does Chuck Parks want to be thanked for saving Dana's life?
2. Did Chuck Parks not intend to save Dana's life, to wit:
2a. Maybe Chuck Parks was saving himself, or
2b. Maybe Chuck Parks was saving Lucky, both of which make saving Dana a collateral act.
3. Would Chuck Parks approve of Dana's porno scenes? Would he express scorn for her cavorting with so many black men? Or would be understand the situational ethics involved, and be moved by Dana's insistence that these men only insert the tip of their penii inside her?
4. Did Chuck Parks, in fact, "save" Dana? I'm thinking of the deconstruction of "save" and all the ways one could interpret the wide illocutionary force of such a word.
5. Could Chuck Parks have done more? Would he have donated a share of TSLA, which no doubt a SpaceX employee would have available as a discount back in 2015 or so?