Originally Posted By: Steezo
Widespread, almost blanket support and praise today for Trump and his humanitarian-defense airstrikes in Syria.


Not from me. I don't think it's well thought-out at all. What is in it for me, Mr. America First, when the United States strikes Syria over acts of the Syrian government in its civil war? I'll go a step further: What is the legal basis for the President's action? Take a look at the Constitution, which requires a Congressional declaration of war, and the War Powers Act for your reference.

Assad is bad. I'll grant you that. I think whoever follows Assad will be many factors worse, and prefer not to hasten his exit as a result.