Quote:
BrookeTyler:
I do have a question, where do you stand on using legitimate full panel testing for all porn shoots whether there is penetration or not?


MikeSouth replied:

My personal take is that periodic full panel testing is required I cant say i do it every 30 days because I sometimes dont shoot for more than 30 days but i prefer the tests to be recent which is why I generally shoot in bursts.
That said the overriding factor is what makes the girl comfy…for instance if you shot and you wanted everyone to have a full panel less than a week old AND a same day oraquick test (which i also do regardless) then thats fine…

Also remember my guys work ONLY for me, they arent in that porn talent pool being exposed every day every one of my guys has been doing this for a minimum of 3 years some much longer so that long history of negative tests also factors in (for me) because I know these guys and what they do. AVN said I dont use industry standard testing and that is true….and thats why i am not “up to my ass in Chlamydia and Gonorrhea” like porn valley is. if there is no penetration or even a solo scene with a dildo I don’t care if she is tested or not (i dont reuse toys except for glass dildos). If I shot a husband and wife in a boy girl scene together i dont care if they are tested or not, I think common sense kinda prevails



There ya go folks. Granted I'm an extrapolator, and between the lines reader, but to me that sounds like, "Don't nobody go spectin me to show a valid test for when I shot that broad." I would figure he doesn't have a test in the PASS system at all, much less a recent one. I don't think the dude could afford to be tested AND pay the $80 for a motel room to shoot in.
_________________________
Thinking of cracked-out and/or tweaking whores getting their throats and asses brutalized for the next hit makes me hard. --Rear Admiral