Quote:

Getting back to the topic at hand...

I had seven reviews on TER when I was escorting (all stellar, thank you very much!). I had to have about five removed during that time because they were submitted by people I've never met, and there was once instance where someone I had seen submitted three reviews of me under three different handles (did he think he was doing me a favor?) TER gives one month free membership for every review submitted, so that encourages a lot of males to submit false reviews rather than pay for membership. Even the "genuine" reviews were souped-up...there was a lot of stuff that never happened.

The majority of TER membership types with one hand. It's less to do with getting the word out about reliable escorts who are good at their job than it is about gaining status and admiration amongst one's fellow hobbyist brethren, even if it means lying. You guys engage in your own forms of chest beating so you should get that.

So FWIW I believe Annie.



I agree with your assessment of The Erotic Review 100%; but I'm afraid you've missed the point.

How many people who ARE NOT escorting have ads for their escorting services on several websites? The review was posted only after she vehemently denied ther authenticity of the website ads.

I've got nothing against girls who escort (in fact, I think it's great). What I don't like is girls who swear up and down that it's phony while posting their availability information and website contact info on a different site.

It's a weird double standard, I can only guess that girls all deny they escort so that they can continue to say that they are not really whores (to themselves and their parents anyway).

PS If I had $1500 laying around the house, I'd call Dani Woodward long before Annie Cruz. http://www.meetdaniwoodward.com/

_________________________
You're all still alive?