Quote:


Secondly, where is this great customer clamor to keep male-male contact out of straight porn movies? Fact is, there is none. There may be a few people wanting to keep it out, but since when did this justify a total ban? Even if it was found by a survey that 80% opposed it, how does this justify a 100% ban?



I never said there was a big to-do about people trying to keep gay porn out of "straight" movies. I'm speaking soley from a business standpoint-- why produce something that you don't have the market for? There is no "ban"-- there just isn't a demand strong enough to call for gay scenes in straight movies. Here is an example of your faulty business sense (and I'm not trying to be offensive): "Even if it was found by a survey that 80% opposed it, how does this justify a 100% ban?" Now what business would produce a product that only 20% of their audience MIGHT enjoy, when they could produce a product that they are fairly sure will garner a much larger percentage, such as 100%? As a businessman(woman) you cater to your audience-- the people that are paying you. When my members post suggestions on my chatboard, it's never for gay porn. It's for blondes/bit tits/natural tits/milfs/young girls... whatever. It's never about the guys. Though I understand your point and your cause is noble, it is what it is and we just go with the flow. There isn't really anyone to blame here.
_________________________
I really try to retain a respectful distance from my models, even when I'm lubing up their pussies.