Do you think it is right for companies, like New Sensations, to hide the fact from their female talent that they will be working with a man who likes to fuck men? As people we have the right to know our sexual partners backgrounds -- regardless if it is work or personal. How many people do you think would be upset if I, as female talent, did a barnyard gangbang on Monday, tested Tuesday, and then went to a boy/girl shoot on Thursday with my negative test. Would I have the right to keep that private? I don't think so.

And if you aren't ashamed of what you have done, then what is the big deal about letting people make an informed decision as to whether they want to work with you?

And lets throw away the excuse these guys use, that they are "gay for pay". Both Biggz/Bam and Byron Long, who have both enjoyed the company of men on video have nothing. If they are lucky they will have some weed in their pocket as they call around for a ride. Obviously, it wasn't for the money.

i don't think they're hiding the info, they're just not telling it and why should they? maybe the chicks should do some background checks themselves before they work with pornstars who did gay movies. also, a lot of them already know but they have no problem, i mean guys like jay ashley and julian made gay movies and everybody knows it but yet they're not being refused. it's all cool as long as they're not hiv positive.

As I've said before, you worry about what they do on film but not what the guy (gay or straight) does off camera. The talent could have been fucking a couple heroin using transexuals before you or whatever but since it is in private you'd never know. However, you seem to think it only counts if it happens on camera.