Grandpa Weasel Holmes (damn I dislike that person even more) posted the following on ADT as part of a longer ramble:
"I've been on sets where the producer insisted that the girl do what she is booked to, no matter if she is crying and screaming. Of course she did it on her own free will. But it still reminds me to rape. Just using dollars instead of a weapon. This will never happen on one of my productions."
1. If you were present why not walk off the set?
2. By your own admission it reminds you of rape--are you not taking part?
3. Where do you draw the line?--a warm corpse? an underage girl (but legal in that area)?, a drugged one? an animal? a cantaloupe?
4. I realize you are a whore, but do you have any morals at all?
5. Enquiring minds want to know--what if it had been your 18y/o child.
6. You really must want to peddle your product to feel the need to post such a thing. Have you no sense of what you are saying about yourself?
7. Now Gramps, don't avoid answering these questions we all know youu've read them.

Maybe the producer also insisted HE do what he was booked to do!
Why doesn't he just walk off the set you say? Probably for exactly the same reason that the girl didn't just walk off the set, 'using dollars instead of a weapon' including maybe the threat of losing work in the future.


One last thing, what the fucking fuck does 'an underage girl (but legal in that area)' mean? This is just self contradictory nonsense: is the girl underage or isn't she, she can't be both!!!

SNP.

Of course the producer would insist HE go on with the scene. My question was when would he refuse? At his level I really don't think we have to worry about his losing work. I still do not understand that, though.
Sir Noel, thanks for pointing out the ambiguity of :"An underage girl(but legal in that area)". To clarify I meant how would he handle filming in a country where the age of consent is less than 18 (legal there), but of course it would not be legal here in the USA.So I guess she can be both. Very kind of you to point the confusion out for me.
I notice that Gramps did not answer. When all is said he will still be IMO a flabbly-assed less than average looking old porn performer. Poor Manuel's sales may be suffering because of Weasel. Thanks for questioning Sir Noel because I feel this near-rape (his words) should be disussed and this way it gets bumped to the top.

--------------------

Dear Sir Noel Plum,

> Maybe the producer also insisted HE do what he was booked to do!

I've pointed this out in another post on ADT. Some directors are very hard to work with. Just look on the famous production of PRIVATE GLADIATOR. The temperatures were between -20 and -10 degrees Celsius (4 to 14 Fahrenheit) and most performers were sick afterwards. This is just one example of many. Sometimes is to cold, sometimes to hot and sometimes a scene takes 10 hours. Some scene are more hard for the men some are very hard for the girls. One reason why many directors like to work with me is, that I'm reliable in difficult circumstances.

When Manuel Ferrara and I shoot our movies we avoid everything which might cause problems. We want everybody to enjoy it. We don't care for "art" but for good real sex.

Steve Holmes

As usual Grandpa you have dodged the question. It was under what circumstances would you walk off. Whether the director is difficult or not you still have free will. You admitted to a near-rape. As a parent don't you have some empathy? Any morals at all? I"m pleased that you will not do such things on your set. Only one thing would make me happier--Your retirement.