.
XXX Porn Talk Navigation Home The Message Board Chat Room Chat Transcripts Contact Information Log In/Out
.
JM Toys and More!!
JM Toys and More!!
New Release This Week
New DVD Release at JerkOffZone.com
VOD / Download Links
JM Downloads/VOD
XPT VOD
Gamelink VOD
New Release This Week
New DVD Release at JerkOffZone.com
Internet Video Rentals
Sugar DVD
Bush DVD
Adult Gossip & News
TRPWL.com
LukeIsBack
TheFloatingWorld
GramPonante.com
Forum Stats
19073 Members
14 Forums
40349 Topics
614156 Posts

Max Online: 639 @ 01/18/23 06:59 AM
Topic Options
#338343 - 06/18/08 07:33 PM Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


http://www.industryblacklist.com/members//detail.php?siteid=2008
--------------------------------------------

Hello everyone this is Karen Stephens, Owner of Florida 1st Models. I had a phone discussion today with Gene Ross of AdultFYI.com hoping to get some assistance in getting my models paid for shoots done for Craig Valentine. The result was an insulting article on AdultFYI written by Gene. Well I see that Gene is one sided individual and seeing that he did not ask to speak to any of the models in question then I have decided to write this. Nor has Gene asked to speak to any of my models that he has wrote about in prior articles from Craig’s point of view. Also because I see that it is fruitless to call Gene – which I have and he now isn’t returning my calls. I always believed that a true journalist sought out all sides to a story…hmmm must have been incorrect.

The facts are these on Wednesday May 7th Craig hired one of my models for a small scene. As of today June 18, 2008 that model has yet to be paid for the scene. Craig neither returns her calls in order to get payment from him. Nor will he return my calls, emails, or pages. Why is this?

Then on Friday May 16th, Saturday May 17th three of my models had shoots scheduled with Valentine. Two performing in hardcore scenes and the other one was an extra. And again another model had a hardcore scene on Friday the 23rd again 2 models performed in scenes for Valentine. Each one of these models was told that these were payroll of 2 weeks. I was there when he said this. Now Craig can call me a liar and maybe one model a liar…but we are talking about four models and me. We all have pour memories or are hard if hearing I think not. Oh and none of these girls have been paid a dime from Craig Valentine.

Craig did come to me about one of the models having a possible medical problem, and it was addressed as it should have been. He also told me his side of the story regarding one of my models bringing coke to a set. I addressed this with that model and she told me her side of the story. Which was that he was harassing her to perform sexually for him personally even though she was there as an extra and not performing that day because her test was not back in time. She turned him down flat, and could this be the real reason that Craig is crying to anyone that will listen…and that is not many people that she was licking coke off the floor of the bathroom. The only person listening is his buddy Gene. When Craig said to another model via a text (which I have a copy) that his wrestlers were offended by her actions – he was asked for their names and numbers so that she could apologize to them. We haven’t seen those of yet…could it be that you made it up?

The same models that performed in these scenes went to his wrestling event on May 18th to be extras or what ever. I was there as well. Craig had no idea what any of the models were going to do, and was making it up as he went. The model in question about her hair showed up in the same outfit as she was in during the shoot, and even fashioned her hair the same way. This actually was the second time that I have attended one of Craig’s so called wrestling events and there was no audience to speak of at either, and scripts and production was being made up as they went along. I am pretty sure that this isn’t how the production is supposed to be conducted.

Craig from the beginning was telling my models stories of how he is soooooo famous, and that he is the only one that can make them big stars. He started calling me telling me to call off the one model about the coke incident that she needed to stop spouting off her mouth or he would make sure that she never worked in this industry again. This model was neither spouting off to anyone nor saying anything about Craig. The only person that keeps bringing up this story is Valentine.

Craig never said a word to me about the model’s hair until a good two weeks after the event that Craig called me to book one of the models for a scene on June 6th that he stated the her hair was different he swore up and down that she had cut a good 3 – 4 inches off of her hair. I didn’t think that she had but called the model to reschedule the photo shoot with Craig. He even said that he could show me the footage in question but has yet to do so. She has not done the shoot as of yet because Craig has been traveling, and the one time only one time that he called to book this she had a prior appointment and could not make the shoot.

As for me “crying to everyone” that Steve Steidmen of Risque Business is doing better then me. Gene you stated today on the phone that Steve had told you not two weeks ago that he was getting out of the agency buisness. Here are the facts. I met with Steve on evening of May 7th, per a suggestion from Craig to hear him out. Steve stated to me that he was having problems getting his girls shoots here in Florida. I said that I would help out if I could and send his girls out to the companies here. Steve then sent me 3 girls – one that was half way decent and got some responses when I sent her out. She then flaked and didn’t’ come in. I managed to get one of the other girls a small shoot in which the producer did not have favorable feedback on her performance. And she was turned down by every other production company here. The third girl had so many tattoos that I would not put her pictures out at all. That was all that Steve brought to the table. Steve tried to paint me a grand picture of what he could do for my models, how he was sitting on five major contracts from major production companies in Los Angeles. I decided to see if what he was telling me was the truth. I do have contacts in Los Angeles as well and made a few phone calls and checked him out. After the Memorial Day weekend I called Steve and told him that I had made a business decision that I felt was best for my models, in which I would not be sending my models out to LA through him. Knowing that Steve was good friends with Craig Valentine, I made a courtesy call to Craig and told him the same thing.

That is when all the problems started. From the time I told Steve and Craig my decision to not go through Steve for LA my models have been harassed via text messages from Craig. He has told them story after story of why they have not received a check. He has also called me a liar and a theif to my models.

Craig started texting one of my models wanting to take her out to dinner, and how he was not sure about how to go about asking her because he was just getting out of his marriage. The model sent me the text messages and I told her that these messages were nearly word for word of messages he was sending to a model back in December. Do you have these messages scripted somewhere I wonder?

Another model has received messages regarding her career and that she should get another agent. Craig dear…loyality is a bitch sometimes. I have the messages that you are sending to my models.

As for any contract negotiations that I am in for one or any of my models for that matter it isn’t any of Craig’s business so please stop asking. You are not her manager – I am.

As for me “kicking” one of my models to the curb? Seriously? I have not asked any model to leave my home, and I would like to see Craig prove it.

As for any personal insults to me; Craig have you looked in a mirror lately? All I want is to get my models paid. Oh and FYI – Other than not paying my models you are over 30 days past due on your invoices to me as well. Please rectify these situations ASAP.

Top
#338344 - 06/19/08 05:56 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
steve5748 Offline
Stormy's Lawyer

Registered: 04/11/08
Posts: 26
Just need to add my two cents as Ms. Stephens who manages her girls like a lady obsessed with control. On the may 7th shoot the camera broke and no shoot happened, yet Ms. Stephens wants her commission. On the May 17/18 shoot one of the girls changed her look when she was specifically told to keep the same outfit available for the next day event. As far as Mr. Valentines pay policy it is 30 days from the completion of the shoot on the Friday following the 30th day. No payment is due unless the shoot is completed.
As far as Mr. seidman he was going to help Ms. Stephens with girls going to LA. But later told her things were slow and as far as Ms. Stephens girls some were overweight, health issues and drug problems and he was not going to value his reputation with some of the producers just so she can get commission.
Agreed I am a management company and never said I was a talent agency, although I have the option of joining forces with a talent agency which I eventually will do if I get the right girl to eventually move into the feature circuit.
If Ms. Stephens problem is with Mr. Valentine his name should be the only one she should mention. Don't get other people involved who have a good reputation and is respected in the adult business. MY @ CENTS!

Top
#338345 - 06/19/08 08:13 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
The Ghost Is Toast Offline
Whoremaster

Registered: 10/21/05
Posts: 2710
Quote:

On the may 7th shoot the camera broke and no shoot happened, yet Ms. Stephens wants her commission.




Not the agent's problem...they have fulfilled their end of the bargain, and thus quite rightly should expect payment.



Top
#338346 - 06/19/08 08:30 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

Quote:

On the may 7th shoot the camera broke and no shoot happened, yet Ms. Stephens wants her commission.




Not the agent's problem...they have fulfilled their end of the bargain, and thus quite rightly should expect payment.







DanG hits this one out of the park.....

If party A said that there was a shoot on 10/10/10 at 10:30pm for X amount of dollars and they wanted party B to provide X amount of models for said shoot. Then unless you have given ample time (minimum of 24 hrs or more) to party B then party B should be compensated at least for something (not the entire FULL FEE) somewhere in the nature of a "kill fee"...as they provided what you wanted from their end....the camera "breaking" is not their fault and sounds like it is shitty equipment problem and definitely not a good excuse for you not fulfilling your end of the bargain.

Quote:

Just need to add my two cents as Ms. Stephens who manages her girls like a lady obsessed with control.




This I believe she acquired from her former boss Brian…..I can believe it. But I think you must understand this. That if you show the inmates that you’re not in complete control of the situation at all times (to most extents) that they will try and take over the asylum. Who we are speaking about (the PW’s) are far from angels to begin with…they are just as big as predators as their so called “agents” are…so if you let down your guard you will be played. It would be the same as a “streetwalker” trying to play a john as a “trick”…..

Don’t get confused…..women that go into porn are not as some people would like to think innocent little victims. They know EXCATLY what they are getting themselves into….and if they don’t they should be quite accustomed to being treated badly in general.

Top
#338347 - 06/19/08 09:01 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Bad Habit Offline
Kurt Lackwood's Fluffer

Registered: 01/18/06
Posts: 1283
Loc: SoCal
Agreed. If you book a girl and she shows up, then you cancel for any reason that is not the girls fault, at the very least you owe a kill fee.
She made the effort and expended the cost to get there and lost out on the possibility of work elsewhere. She deserves to be compensated.

And, if treated fairly, most agencies would cancel their agency fees in a situation like this.

This is not the kind of reputation I would want to create for my production company. No agency would book with you and you'd be left with craigslist as your only source of performers.
_________________________
I'd rather be ignorant than stupid. Ignorance implies a lack of knowledge which is easily correctable through education. Stupidity implies an inability to learn. Therefore; ignorance is temporary, stupidity is forever!

Top
#338348 - 06/19/08 03:55 PM Gene's [AdultFYI] rebuttal to the Stephens
Anonymous
Unregistered


http://adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=28664
------------------------------------------

Proving that no good deed goes unpunished, I find it almost amusing that this Karen Stephens woman would contact me about getting her money, which is not my business to begin with, but hers- then resorts to buffoonery of the garden variety.

To wit, Stephens writes on www.xxxporntalk.com :

(FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD)

.........

My crony Craig Valentine calls me from New Jersey to give me a heads up about this posting.

"Welcome to my world!" Valentine is laughing.

"At least you see the fucking shit I have to deal with," he adds.

"How would I know?" I ask him. "You're dealing with someone who according to Stephens is not a true journalist and incompetent to understand. I hope you realize this."

Valentine says this is the reason why he's doing all his productions in LA from now on, so he doesn't have to deal with the Stephens of the world. Valentine finds the part where Stephens describes him chasing one of her girls around to take her to dinner most inventive.

"It's amazing- every time in LA when I'm springing for dinner nine porn stars show up," states Valentine. "Including Ron, Evan, Tommy and whoever we pick up along the way. I do have the reputation for the porn star dinner call and everyone showing up. Like I was ringing the cowbell. But they're all scared of you because you bring the tape recorder."

"All true journalists have one," I inform Valentine.

Valentine says he's got eye witnesses and had to throw chicks out of his hotel room from his last trip to Vegas.

"And you should see some of the pictures of her girls- the ones who have the yeast infections," Valentine chuckles. "And the crap is just pouring out of their crotch. Especially this girl Missy. And Karen's going, yeah, but I sent her to the doctor. How can you not tell your pussy don't stink?

"And if you go to her website for the current status of her girls HIV tests? Every one is expired ten days ago."

Valentine also points out that the way the system works in Florida he's not allowed to see any of these tests unless Stephens prints them out and brings them to him.

"What do you have to hide?" Valentine wonders. "Nikki had Chlamydia. So did Vanessa. It seems like this happens to every girl, and Brian had the same problem when Karen was there. All the girls were testing positive for Chlamydia- Chrissy, Cody, Autumn Sky, every single girl. What are they doing that nobody knows about? They must be banging somebody. And Brian hasn't had an outbreak of chlamydia in his camp since Karen left."

"And she's saying Craig goes around telling everyone he's a super star," Valentine points out. "You know me long enough. I may talk about my accomplishments but I never tell anyone I'm a star. I take great pride in pushing the stars that work for me."

According to Valentine, Stephens makes her girls hang out with Dave Pounder.

"All the girls are instructed to hang out with him because he's the star," continues Valentine.

According to what I've heard, Pounder lives in a one bedroom with a kayak in the middle of the living room. He does a $300 shoot on the provision that the girls spend the night with him. It's supposed to be a "content" shoot but cameras rarely roll.

Asked if this is true, Valentine says it must be because that would explain why girls don't want to hang out with him because he's not paying $300 under those conditions.

"Last time I checked I get more pussy than I know what to do with," says Valentine. "Why do I need to pay for someone? I get paid to get laid. I'm believing more and more what I heard in Vegas- that the girls coming in our business now are all hookers."

"And maybe someone should tell these girls the truth like their pussies stink."

Valentine says there's another new post about one of Stephens' girls having herpes.

"The only good thing about Eli, who was a piece of shit, is that his girls were clean when they showed up on set."

Valentine also says that the wrestling event where Stephens claims there was no audience to speak of, had 300 people in attendance.

"The club had 100,000 sq. ft so attendance wouldn't make a dent in the place," he explains. "It's a big place but I got the door money from the club."

Top
#338349 - 06/19/08 05:19 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
steve5748 Offline
Stormy's Lawyer

Registered: 04/11/08
Posts: 26
FYI, the girl was offered a kill fee and refused as she wanted to reshoot the scene when she came back into town. When the scene is complete the agent can get her fee. As far as the other girls, when the scene and still are compleye tthey will get their money

Top
#338350 - 06/19/08 07:08 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

FYI, the girl was offered a kill fee and refused as she wanted to reshoot the scene when she came back into town. When the scene is complete the agent can get her fee. As far as the other girls, when the scene and still are compleye tthey will get their money




So Steve was all of this drama really necessary other then to get free publicity for you and all of your "people"....

I really think that all of you south Florida "people" should start getting your individual "acts" (or shit) together...separately and go about business as professionals.....not a bunch of bottom feeder low life’s only looking for the short term gain....none of this press impresses any PW's with 1/2 a brain....and your pulling the industry down in general by making Florida the laughingstock of the entire adult industry.

Steve this is NO way me singling YOU out but simply giving advice to the group as a whole in general. None of you can be taken seriously if you don’t act appropriately....LA seems to have their act together (don’t get me wrong…it took them awhile for them to tweak it as well to what it is today) or at least they have some standards...like standard operating procedures of how they handle the girls, paying the girls...etc......why do you guys always seem like your bucking the system??? The game is not going to change.....not for any of you.....you must learn to adapt or you will wither and die.

So outside of those simple rules….unless someone steps forward to contend Steves allegations that the girl was given a choice…..this little piece of drama should die.

PS….BTW…side note…if a “real” “LA” agency was to get licensed and open a satellite office in South Florida…..All of you chumps would be wiped off the map in less then a month…..Think about that the next time you decide to go off on some tangent about something ridiculously stupid or something that actually amounts to absolutely nothing at all. Now go get some sleep….drive your new stock of whores around tomorrow and make some fucking $$$......

Top
#338351 - 06/20/08 05:09 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
steve5748 Offline
Stormy's Lawyer

Registered: 04/11/08
Posts: 26
Velvet, this is for you. I recently spoke with Craig who is still out of town. All checks will be cut by the accountant on Monday and sent out to the appropriate parties. Hopefully this will stop all this bull. it seems as if this so called agent is starting to create shit that doesn't't really exist unless it's in her mind. She was totally informed about pay schedules so she has no room to bitch. All I am is the mediator, I hate to have my name drawn into this shit. her problem was with Craig not me. If she has a problem with me than she can confront me in person if she wants. If she proceeds to bash me on the web than things will take a different turn and she will have to face the wrath of STEVE. Hopefully, this will;l stop all the bull. check will be sent certified to the address the girls have given on their paperwork, we will not send checks directly to the agent as Ms. Stephens has suggested.

Top
#338352 - 06/20/08 10:32 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Bad Habit Offline
Kurt Lackwood's Fluffer

Registered: 01/18/06
Posts: 1283
Loc: SoCal
I feel for you Stevie, but be aware even this can be problematic.
We had a check issue with a pw a year or two back where it kept coming back as undeliverable.

We called the first time to verify the address.
Called the second time only to find out she was using the wrong zip code.
Called a third time to find out she lived in an apartment complex and hadn't given a unit number.
Then the stupid bitch moved without a forwarding address! We gave up and had her agency send someone over to pick it up after it was returned for the fifth time.

Almost 5 months of receiving nasty phone calls from her and/or her agent all because she couldn't give us her correct address even after multiple tries.

I assume she finally got it but really didn't care at that point.

_________________________
I'd rather be ignorant than stupid. Ignorance implies a lack of knowledge which is easily correctable through education. Stupidity implies an inability to learn. Therefore; ignorance is temporary, stupidity is forever!

Top
#338353 - 06/20/08 11:41 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

Velvet, this is for you. I recently spoke with Craig who is still out of town. All checks will be cut by the accountant on Monday and sent out to the appropriate parties. Hopefully this will stop all this bull. it seems as if this so called agent is starting to create shit that doesn't't really exist unless it's in her mind. She was totally informed about pay schedules so she has no room to bitch. All I am is the mediator, I hate to have my name drawn into this shit. her problem was with Craig not me. If she has a problem with me than she can confront me in person if she wants. If she proceeds to bash me on the web than things will take a different turn and she will have to face the wrath of STEVE. Hopefully, this will;l stop all the bull. check will be sent certified to the address the girls have given on their paperwork, we will not send checks directly to the agent as Ms. Stephens has suggested.





So this is what I say with the best of intentions to all parties concerned. I think if there is all of the necessary legal paperwork and it is not totally written in legal jargon…..that the PW should be advised about the payment schedule on film while they are holding up their ID’s for technical compliance of 2257’s. There you would have them verbally agreeing and you could even add an additional form notifying them in PLAIN ENGLISH/SPANISH that they will NOT receive any monies until 30 days after the PAYROLL DEPT has their CURRENT info and its been processed and that they should list another friend or family members address that hasn’t moved in the last 6 months…..so you can send it there…end of story. Kind of like a backup system for anything…..primary address, alternate address and then finally if those two don’t work you can give it over to the talent manager who brought them over to you in the first place…..I would also get a signed statement from the manager that you released the check over to that individual so it not your responsibility anymore. These are just some simple logical operating procedures that can be seen on a daily basis in life……if a UPS driver hands you some type of package they will get your information…so when someone decides to bitch and say they never received their item….UPS can come back and say….Mr. X signed for that package…..see where I am going with that. The certified mail route is the right thing to do…all the attorneys use it…and it seems to work for them pretty well. Sure its a little more time, effort and money wasted but it will cost you with less in bullshit in the long run! Now come on you guys...you aint amateurs to this game…you have been around the block enough times to have seen this coming a mile away…..don’t let some newbie….PW or manager play you…..trust me it doesn’t really look good on your resume.

I agree with you totally Steve you don’t need to be dragged through the mud unless you were a co-conspirator or an accomplice when or while these transactions had taken place. It may just be a case of being at right place but at wrong time.

Top
#338354 - 06/20/08 03:19 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
freestylah Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 4856
Loc: The 4th International
steve5748 wrote:

Quote:

...If she proceeds to bash me on the web than things will take a different turn and she will have to face the wrath of STEVE.




OH NO! Not the wrath of STEVE!
_________________________
The only thing you got that I want, is your suffering.

Top
#338355 - 06/26/08 12:59 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
misterz Offline
Rob Black's Crack Pipe

Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 108
If the model doesnt get paid then the 'model release' is null and void.(even if they are two seperate contracts..the model release, and the performance contract.) Notify the distributor that the model releases are not valid and contact your local district attorney. Believe me, you will get paid when the distributor refuses to sell the product.

My camera broke...sounds pretty low budget to me.

Top
#338356 - 06/26/08 06:32 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Ummm... Non-performance of contract is a Civil issue, Master Bates. The DA has no jurisdiction in the matter. If she doesn't get paid, she can sue him like Brandy Alexandre did to John Stagliano.

Yeah, you were an elected official in two different states, alright.

Top
#338357 - 06/26/08 10:24 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Now that matter would have been totally different again if lets say the producer paid you by check and you signed the release. After the fact said check did not clear.....Acct Closed or NSF then you have a "criminal" case since you have an actual negotiable financial instrument. This matter would generally fall under the "Fraud" statutes. If the check was sent through the U.S. Postal System you maybe able to even talk with one of the Postal Inspectors about laws concerning “mail fraud”.

Principals would also apply if the producer paid the performer in counterfeit government currency (bank notes). Where then the performer themselves would want to call the local office of the U.S. Secret Service.

It’s those “little things” that can make a persons life not really worth living.

Now I will tell you this….I am NOT a lawyer……but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

Top
#338358 - 06/26/08 10:55 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

After the fact said check did not clear.....Acct Closed or NSF then you have a "criminal" case since you have an actual negotiable financial instrument. This matter would generally fall under the "Fraud" statutes.




Not in and of itself. First off, most states allow the person/company that issued the check time to make good on it, especially in the case of an NSF check (here it's 10 days from the date the check was dishonored.)

There's also the fact that where a complainant has the option of pursuing either civil or criminal remedies, most prosecutors will encourage said complainant to chose the former. For one thing, the burden of proof is much easier to meet in a civil case (the preponderance of the evidence) than in a criminal case (the proverbial "beyond a reasonable doubt.") All a civil plaintiff has to do is demonstrate that Joe Blow was to pay her XXX.XX for services rendered and failed to do so. It doesn't matter why. In a criminal prosecution (at least under the NY statutes) the prosecutor is required to prove that not only wasn't she paid, but that Joe Blow intended to not pay her. That's where it gets hairy. Most check-kiting prosecutions here (that I'm aware of) occur where the target has done this on multiple occasions to multiple victims, thereby establishing what's known as a "Scheme to Defraud."

Also, prosecutors (especially those in busy jurisdictions) generally don't have the time to play debt collector, so if you have another route available to you, they will suggest that you take it.

But, considering that these transactions occurred in Florida, this may all be academic: One of the upshots of the Ray Guhn case seems to be that, in the eyes of the law in that state, pornography = prostitution. A contract for an illegal activity is unenforceable.

Top
#338359 - 06/26/08 11:45 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Gigi Offline
Porn Fucking Master

Registered: 05/18/06
Posts: 3555
i bounced a check once at target. soooooooo embarrassing
_________________________
"I'm going to spend the rest of the weekend deep frying the fuck out of anything that gets in my way." --Handful

Top
#338360 - 06/26/08 02:38 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


I also failed to mention in as you stated Jim the "grace period" to make good on them....but also the redepositing factor (double NSF fee's sometimes for both parties involved) and that business like "Target"...have store/corporate polices that not only that the checks go out to third party "collection agencies" and that you will get charged additionally for their respective states service charges/fee's as well......not to mention being put on the "do not accept" list...complied by companies like ChexSystems and Telecheck...so essentially if your checking account gets closed you will never be able to open another account for either 5 years and/or until you have satisfied all previous listed "debits" in full.

Another point to make is…who the fuck actually writes checks anymore…..maybe “payroll” checks for square companies….but most have transitioned over to direct deposit to a checking or savings account or some type of reloadable debit card as they do with most government benefits (social security, food stamps and the like). Shit I see adult webmasters using paypal, e-gold and epassporte. If the adult website businesses can pay their affiliates in this manner why can’t they do the same for the PW’s? Wouldn’t it end the entire he said she said confusion and the stupidly over agents/managers trying to confuse their client or skim cash from the shoot? FUCK that’s right…this is porn…without the drama what would you have left?

Top
#338361 - 06/29/08 05:02 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
misterz Offline
Rob Black's Crack Pipe

Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 108
Quote:

Ummm... Non-performance of contract is a Civil issue, Master Bates. The DA has no jurisdiction in the matter. If she doesn't get paid, she can sue him like Brandy Alexandre did to John Stagliano.

Yeah, you were an elected official in two different states, alright.






I guess I need to clarify.....I meant notify the DA of the distribution company that is selling product with inconmplete 2257 information.(or FBI). The matter of payment is a civil issue, you are corretct about that.

But believe me it works when a distributor starts breathing down the neck of content producers who do not have VALID 2257 documentation.

ANd again, if she doesnt get paid, the release is null and void. Any real agent knows this. Some agents have their talent withhold the release form until payment has been recieved, or they physically keep the signed release form until they get paid.

Top
#338362 - 06/29/08 05:13 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


You mean the US Attorney. 2257 is a Federal issue, not a State or Local one.

In any event, what does 2257 have to do with a payment dispute? Especially one where the shoot never took place?

Top
#338363 - 06/29/08 06:33 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
misterz Offline
Rob Black's Crack Pipe

Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 108
Quote:

You mean the US Attorney. 2257 is a Federal issue, not a State or Local one.

In any event, what does 2257 have to do with a payment dispute? Especially one where the shoot never took place?





It has everyhing to do with it. Until payment is made, the contract is not complete, and the modelrelease is no good. With no model release, you have nothing to "back up" the identity of the 2257 documentation. This has all been covered by PORNLAW in other threads. Without payment the model release and 2257 documentation is "incomplete."


p.s. It is a federal issue(2257), but the D.A.'s office in Los Angeles is always more than willing to assist performers who take this route, and several have. A call from a localD.A. gets much more attention than a call from a sex worker.(another little "trick" that sex workers use to get what they are owed.You just dont see this on adultfyi,luke etc. so how would you ever know about it?)


If no shoot took placethen of course there is no 2257. But the low budget, my camera broke guy, should still pay a kill fee. Otherwise, I can see how that company might have trouble getting talent to work for them in the future.

There are two sides to every contract. BOTH sides have to COMPLETE their end of the "bargain" for the contact to be settled.


Top
#338364 - 06/29/08 06:42 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

This has all been covered by PORNLAW in other threads.




Name one.

Quote:

the D.A.'s office in Los Angeles is always more than willing to assist performers who take this route, and several have.




Name one.

Quote:

If no shoot took placethen of course there is no 2257.




Then why are you bringing it up?


Quote:

But the low budget, my camera broke guy, should still pay a kill fee. Otherwise, I can see how that company might have trouble getting talent to work for them in the future.




Tell us something we don't know, Captain obvious.

Top
#338365 - 06/29/08 06:54 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

There are two sides to every contract. BOTH sides have to COMPLETE their end of the "bargain" for the contact to be settled.




Don’t know if the world you are looking for is
"settled"....more like void....as in a contact would be void or invalid.

But misterz has a point to some degree...I never understood why the PW's would fully complete all of the necessary paperwork prior to them being paid.

Most legit jobs...when you get your payment in whatever form you would sign off on it...or initial it...thus stating that you actually received it.

Totally withstanding the argument of ID verification initially for general 2257 regs but to sign the release before being paid in full is just nuts....

If I was in a producers shoes I would rather not have any of these types of controversies hanging over my head...especially on the avenue of rates, pay or trying to dupe an unsuspecting PW into an unscheduled or altered at the last minute scene.

This is the way you get negative (exceptionally bad) press quickly.

The conclusion I would suggest to keep yourself out of hot water is to get a Copy of their ID's, Copy of their AIM test and have them fill out the model release up to their signature....after the shoot is done and the model gets paid she/he signs the release...something just like out of the cold war trading prisoners between east and west Berlin.

Top
#338366 - 06/29/08 07:13 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


All fine and good. I'm all for whores getting money for their work. But he alleges that non-payment somehow invalidates the 2257 documentation, and I'd like to know where he gets this from.

I'd also like to know why he's even raising the 2257 issue if no scene was shot. I don't think anyone's disputing the need for a kill fee except the jackass with the broken camera.

Top
#338367 - 06/29/08 08:34 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

All fine and good. I'm all for whores getting money for their work. But he alleges that non-payment somehow invalidates the 2257 documentation, and I'd like to know where he gets this from.

I'd also like to know why he's even raising the 2257 issue if no scene was shot. I don't think anyone's disputing the need for a kill fee except the jackass with the broken camera.




Nothing invalidates a 2257....outside of a "fake" ID....it may put into the question of the model release...but those there are technical issues that only a competent and qualified lawyer would be able to sort out.

Top
#338368 - 06/29/08 08:44 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Exactly. One's got nothing to do with the other. So much for our latest "insider."

Top
#338369 - 06/29/08 09:17 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
misterz Offline
Rob Black's Crack Pipe

Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 108
Jim, I was just watching "The Bourne Supremecy." I dont know if you've ever seen the movie, but there was one line in it perfectly describes your 'insight' into the adult biz. I know you all hate it when I point out that reading these boards and 'industry' newsites leaves you woefully uninformed.


One agent is talking to another agent and he cant understand how the other person fails to graps the concept of what they're talking about. The one agent says to the other...."You talk about this like you read it in a book."

I laughed out loud and thought of you.

Top
#338370 - 06/29/08 09:24 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Says the guy who thinks non-payment invalidates 2257.

Top
#338371 - 06/29/08 09:27 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
misterz Offline
Rob Black's Crack Pipe

Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 108


Nothing invalidates a 2257....outside of a "fake" ID....it may put into the question of the model release.


Absolutely factually 100% wrong.

ANd I was speaking in general, not this specific incident. Failure to pay will void "all' related contracts. The model release is necessary to back up the i.d. provided by the perfomer.

Top
#338372 - 06/29/08 09:34 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


I liked our last "insider" better. This guy's got all the personality of a gay phlebotomist.

Top
#338373 - 06/29/08 09:46 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
misterz Offline
Rob Black's Crack Pipe

Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 108
Quote:

I liked our last "insider" better. This guy's got all the personality of a gay phlebotomist.




I guess you have been to AIM before. If you've ever been to AIM you know why this is funny. Got to give you this one Jim.

Top
#338374 - 06/29/08 09:52 PM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:

Quote:

I liked our last "insider" better. This guy's got all the personality of a gay phlebotomist.




I guess you have been to AIM before. If you've ever been to AIM you know why this is funny. Got to give you this one Jim.




Nope. Never been. Someone who's actually in the industry gave me the heads up.

Speaking of not being in the industry, I'd say this puts the lie to those repeated denials of yours. Why not just admit it from the get go? Or does "Dr." Mitchell frown upon you speaking out of class?

Top
#338375 - 06/30/08 05:26 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
freestylah Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 4856
Loc: The 4th International
Totally off topic, but worth mentioning:

misterz, are you in love with the words "woefully uninformed"? You use them very liberally. And what is so woefully about being uninformed? Isn't ignorance bliss?
_________________________
The only thing you got that I want, is your suffering.

Top
#338376 - 06/30/08 11:52 AM Re: Karen Stephens Blasts Valentine & Gene Ross
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:



Nothing invalidates a 2257....outside of a "fake" ID....it may put into the question of the model release.


Absolutely factually 100% wrong.

ANd I was speaking in general, not this specific incident. Failure to pay will void "all' related contracts. The model release is necessary to back up the i.d. provided by the perfomer.





Ok...a 2257...is NOT a “contract” in the sense that it is only Two (2) forms of valid ID..NO I wont go into detail of what the US government yesterday, today or tomorrow constitutes is a "valid" ID. That being said...it is just a plain "copy" of the two forms of ID and that is all. So by my definition (we will digress to speaking Clintonesque) once again a 2257 is NOT a contract of any sort....it is the US governments way to verify the actor is of "legal" age to perform in a motion picture that is of adult in nature.

Now associated paperwork and/or forms my accompany the forms listed above but are still yet to be looked on at as “contracts”. I too am speaking in “general” terms as well…..but in theory an actual court of law can’t throw out valid “ID’s” issued by a state or federal governmental agency unless they are proven to be fraudulent this is in direct reference to my “fake” ID’s remark.

Now from a legal standpoint a “model release” is a clear cut legal document and as such my be interpreted not only by the actual judge presiding over the case but by previous case statues (precedents) or even by the state or federal laws that would apply to the actual case. Now again the release may be vague or very clear as to the project and form of payment…this naturally depends on who was the original attorney who wrote up the forms initially. So THAT is why a 2257 is not an actual piece of legal documentation….a 2257 only proves one thing and that is only the age of the participants in the content.

That would be like a model taking you to court…example…(Plaintiff) your honor this guy doesn’t have a model release for me for the content he put up on his website…….(JUDGE) does the defendant have such model release for this model appearing before me in my courtroom? (Defendant) No I don’t your honor but I have all my 2257’s in order……(JUDGE) Ok, so you have copies of her ID’s….well at least she’s not a minor……but I see no evidence of any type of model release…so my ruling is in favor of the plaintiff. So as you can see from the above…you must have BOTH items and a 2257 is not a legal document or yeah you could actually say that the items copied for the paper that is a 2257 are legal documents…since they are valid federal/state ID’s….


Now, any other questions???

Top



Moderator:  Jigaloo 
Shout Box

JM Productions
JM Productions Official Home is the JerkOffZone.com
Gag Factor
Yeah, it's that fucked up!!
American Bukkake
Tap into your inner degenerate!!
JM has the Best Variety !!
JM Video Lines
Who's Online
0 registered (), 312 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod