Just general question for anyone that watches porn, and I will REALLY, REALLY appreciate a response. Why is it so, so difficult to find porn with petite girls with nice large breasts getting their breasts squeezed (diora baird type)?


And not in weirdo positions like I have seen on porn (wasted countless hours), but just normal positions most guys would do it, usually when a girl is upright and leaning slightly forward.

The 3 BEST positions to watch, but the toughest (and i mean super tough) to find: reverse cowgirl (girl's back is turned to the guy, she is sitting on top of him, and he slips his arms underneath hers to fondle her breasts. She is usually leaning a little forward, but not too much, and leaning backwards is not too nice looking), a girl riding the guy on top, leaning slightly forward (guy can just reach up and fondle them, but the guys in porn never do that), and last position, girl is standing up, with her hands on top of a desk or table, leaning slightly forward, while the guy does her from behind, and again slips his arms underneath hers to squeeze her breasts. The best way to shoot these too is to capture the ENTIRE girl's body, her breasts and her snatch being penetrated into, not like super close so you only see her breasts or you only see her lower half, you capture a nice medium long, maybe slightly closeup shot of her naked body. This is tricky, but by no means impossible (i've made my own sex tapes).
The strangest thing about these 3 positionst that I have flipped through millions of sex books describing millions of different sexual positions, and these 3 appear nowhere, yet they are the only way I'd have sex (w/exception being on top of a girl). My life would be so, so much better if porn directors did these 3 positions 99% of the time with petite, well-endowed girls instead of .000005% of the time.


If ANYONE knows any videos or links I can find that fit any of these 3 positions, I WILL pay TOP $$ for this kind of porn.
My dream fantasy porn: ever seen clockwork orange, the 1st shot of the naked girl stripped down in the abandoned theater. A scene EXACTLY, i mean EXACTLY like that, except no far away shots, and it transitions into a nice medium long/ medium long close up shot of one of the 3 positions i've described above (girl standing up would be best), shot in that way as well. Thanks for reading this!!!

Hmm.....I can't think of any links or movies to help you out. Sorry. But I do know a lovely girl that will shit in a Tupperware© container and sell it to you for $100. Seriously.

Ok, DID I ASK for a girl shitting in a tuppelware? Does ANYTHING in my post say that? See that's the entire problem with porn industry. And this is to ALL DIRECTORS/PRODUCERS on the forum. There are certain things fans want, why can't you provide, or at least answer the question in a legitimate way? I know you guys are in the business of making money, and what I have specifically said above is what i WOULD pay money for, on a consistent basis, for the rest of my life. I don't like closeups of anal, or snatches, or 3-somes, or a guy shitting in a girl's mouth. What i've said above is the ONLY thing that gets me off, and I know there has to be other porn fans that share my sentiments. So again, to a porn director/producer on this forum, please read this, at least post a reply for why it can't be done. Don't just leave me haning. Thanks.

Easy man cool your jets er, jet219us. If your gonna post here thicken your skin a bit, or don't post while your still masterbating, as it can lead to increased aggravation. Personally I wait till I've snapped a batch or two, before logging on, then I'm ready for whatever gets thrown my way, stress free!
As for your request I will personally endeavour to fondle more boobs, even at the risk or imprisonment.

Because, in general, having a hand or an arm up blocks the shot. It's easier to get the "money shot" if everyone just keeps their hands and arms out of the way.
While some tit squeezing is good, too much of it and all you ever see is a hand over a tit and not the tit itself.

Hey, thanks for the replies, and sorry about the last post. also wanna say, thanks for the last post, that is something i understand directors will see. In response (not flamed, just for really sake of getting a debate goin), it's true if the guy grabs the tit, you can't see it. That's why you position the camera so you get a full frontal shot of the girl, so the guy can grab the breasts for at least 2-3 minutes maybe, and when he lets go, you can still see them in all their glory as the girl is penetrating. I've SEEN porns that do this, its just its for such a short time like 5 seconds and the camera cuts away in the middle. I just wish porn directors would try to emphasize this, or at least give it 3-4 minutes of treatment in each porn, with the respective positions i've listed. Out of a 50 minute porn, i think 5-6 dedicated to what I've recommended is completely possible. But I at least appreciate getting a response (not a joke, but a real one) on why it's not usually done. If any directors on this board want to send me a pm, i can say exactly how you can do it w/o compromising a shot, its very possible, whether the girl is on top, standing up turned around, or in reverse cowgirl. It'd be nice to see this with l
ots of hot girls.

had to bump this up for producters/directors to see. Is there any way you guys would consider doing one with 3-4 minutes at least of each/either of the 3 positions I described? I don't think that would cut out the tit shot too much.

bump

He is fast approaching to return. All is right with this world here.