19073 Members
14 Forums
40349 Topics
614156 Posts
Max Online: 639 @ 01/18/23 06:59 AM
|
|
|
#498634 - 10/01/10 10:30 PM
President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 12/20/07
Posts: 522
|
The election of President Palin will set porn history - the first President who had a porn parody done of them before they were elected.
I personally know the libertarian streak in Sarah will over-ride the Left's presumption of prudishness.
How could it get any worse for porn? Obama has to go! 
Edited by whorebot (10/01/10 10:31 PM)
_________________________
‘Harder!’ she begged, ‘Harder!! Tell me what you think of Chomsky!’
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498635 - 10/02/10 09:45 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 12/09/08
Posts: 8433
Loc: Great Pacific Northwest
|
Neither good nor bad no matter who's elected. I'm old enough to remember the Meese Commission and how the sky was falling then.
Sure, Stagliano and Paul got dragged into court, but at least in Max's case it was a matter of asking to get busted.
Porn, is for the most part, is a dead issue national politics wise.
_________________________
Having killed someone doesn't make you a killer- @KINGROCHE
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498637 - 10/02/10 12:14 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch
Registered: 12/17/09
Posts: 219
|
Quote:
I'm waiting to see who will release a sextape for the 2012 campaign.
You know at some point it will come out that Obama has been cheating with a white woman.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498640 - 10/03/10 10:17 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 06/14/03
Posts: 449
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm waiting to see who will release a sextape for the 2012 campaign.
You know at some point it will come out that Obama has been cheating with a white woman.
Maybe Palin herself? Imagine her sucking "jimbo's" black, muslim meat 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498644 - 10/04/10 07:02 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 9113
Loc: red dirt state of mind
|
Quote:
Quote:
The election of President Palin
That's some funny shit. Tell me another one.
President Chis Christie.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498646 - 10/04/10 02:13 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
well behind every pres....is a great vp.....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498647 - 10/04/10 03:34 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 12/09/08
Posts: 8433
Loc: Great Pacific Northwest
|
Spiro Fucking Agnew. How the hell did that happen? Seriously, look at that fucker and his background. He looks like if you touched him your finger would come back greasy. I know the VP is mostly ceremonial, waiting desperately for the boss to start coughing. But this guy was a lghtweight from the start.
Yuck.
_________________________
Having killed someone doesn't make you a killer- @KINGROCHE
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498650 - 10/06/10 06:28 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 12/20/07
Posts: 522
|
3AM phone call?
She's fucking on it!! 
Edited by whorebot (10/06/10 06:29 PM)
_________________________
‘Harder!’ she begged, ‘Harder!! Tell me what you think of Chomsky!’
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498653 - 10/06/10 07:06 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 12/20/07
Posts: 522
|
Nice Find E.Y...! (seriously)
I knew you were obsessed with Palin..Now I have proven it.
Keep beatin' off! - it's better than nothing!
_________________________
‘Harder!’ she begged, ‘Harder!! Tell me what you think of Chomsky!’
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498654 - 10/06/10 07:16 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 12/20/07
Posts: 522
|
Humans!...Let's destroy them !
(E.Y. c'mon - give it your best shot!)
Edited by whorebot (10/06/10 07:17 PM)
_________________________
‘Harder!’ she begged, ‘Harder!! Tell me what you think of Chomsky!’
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498657 - 10/06/10 11:52 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Human Garbage
Registered: 04/02/09
Posts: 1541
Loc: Mississippi
|
Where's the little retarded child?
I know, I know, trick question.
_________________________
--Some of us look for The Way in opium and some in God, some of us in whiskey and some in love. It is all the same Way and it leads nowhither.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498659 - 10/07/10 06:07 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch
Registered: 05/21/07
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
I have to say that for all the hijinks aimed at the Palin family, the dragging of the little kid into was by far the lamest and most tasteless.
Don't rewrite history please. Palin dragged the kid into, displaying it and talking about at the Republican convention. After she used it as a political prop, the said prop became fair game.
As for good/bad for porn, here is a very simple cheat sheet since so many of you still don't seem to get it:
Democratic presidents -- good for porn; Republican presidents -- bad for porn.
The reason is very simple: Republicans can't get elected without the evangelical anti-abortion, anti-porn crowd. They can't ever deliver on the banning abortion pledge (and would be committing political suicide if they somehow did), so every time they are in power, the crumbs they throw at the evangelicals involve starting a bunch of porn prosecutions.
Meanwhile a core Democratic constituency is the free speech absolutist, pro-ACLU left. And while the Ds can't deliver on real stuff like pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan, closing Gitmo or putting the banksters behind the financial crisis in jail, they don't start any new porn prosecutions. Clear now?
_________________________
"Is the snake OK?"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498660 - 10/07/10 07:10 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 9113
Loc: red dirt state of mind
|
Yeah Obama has just been great for porn so far. It has really flourished in the valley these last two years.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498662 - 10/07/10 09:53 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 12/09/08
Posts: 8433
Loc: Great Pacific Northwest
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have to say that for all the hijinks aimed at the Palin family, the dragging of the little kid into was by far the lamest and most tasteless.
Don't rewrite history please. Palin dragged the kid into, displaying it and talking about at the Republican convention. After she used it as a political prop, the said prop became fair game.
As for good/bad for porn, here is a very simple cheat sheet since so many of you still don't seem to get it:
Democratic presidents -- good for porn; Republican presidents -- bad for porn.
The reason is very simple: Republicans can't get elected without the evangelical anti-abortion, anti-porn crowd. They can't ever deliver on the banning abortion pledge (and would be committing political suicide if they somehow did), so every time they are in power, the crumbs they throw at the evangelicals involve starting a bunch of porn prosecutions.
Meanwhile a core Democratic constituency is the free speech absolutist, pro-ACLU left. And while the Ds can't deliver on real stuff like pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan, closing Gitmo or putting the banksters behind the financial crisis in jail, they don't start any new porn prosecutions. Clear now?
Not clear at all, but thanx for trying.
The Downs kid: Could you tell us what should have been done with this kid? Paraded him out, as a prop. Like the rest of her kids? Like Barry has? Like Clinton did? I was outraged when Limbaugh dumped on that girl, just as you should be outraged that people were dumping on that kid. Like every other politician with a family does? Or is this new to the Palins?
So tell me, was it the kid's fault or Palin's fault that people shit on him? Because it's been proven right here that good hearted folks like you can't be at fault for shitting on a DD kid. Is it that her politics, her fucking politics (which no one knew in the early days when the real fun surrounding that kid started), that makes shitting on a DD baby OK in your book? Or is it maybe something wrong in you? Sort of like the way Cuck sees a darkie and automatically thinks "nigger"? I'm guessing the problem is within you, if you have to go so far afield to defend that kind of cowardly bullshit. Rewriting history is one thing, lad. But to lay the blame for getting that kid shit on on the Palin family doorstep is fucking idiotic.
Should they have kept the kid locked up, under wraps, like those royal Kennedys did? I can hear all you pure of hearts now crowing to the rooftops that they were ashamed to have a DD baby.
Michelle mentioned her and Barry's kid were at a danger of being tubby. So much so that the girl had to see a doctor. Does that make the girls a prop? Is it open season on them? I'm sure them using using their kid as a prop is somehow different, because they think the right way. Oh, by the way, in case you don't know: Nothing makes it open season on them. They're children for fuck's sake.
The Bush daughters, the Gore kids, they're adults. They're on their own. But something is really fucked up when attacking little kids because of the percieved sins of their parents is OK. I somehow doubt we're clear on that.
As to the question, you're just wrong. No serious Presidential candidate is going to come out in favor of porn. Show me the one who has. The best you're going to get is a discreet order to DOJ to not have porn cases as a high priority. Kind of like the recent instructions to DEA to leave Compassion Clubs alone in states where MedPot is legal.
I go back to the Meese era...again. The sky didn't fall. The Flynt prosecution was local, IIRC. Oh, wait. That was during the Carter Administration. Yeah, big Righty him. Frankly, the sky didn't fall during Bush 2. I'm sure Hirsch was glad to see Max et al being targeted. So, really the question would be which part of the industry would be adversely affected? The PPV, pretty box covers, contract girls who don't do anal? Probably not, no matter what direction the wind from Washington. The "other" side...the side most of us dig? Well, keep their books and records in order, probably no problem either. If you cut corners, send stuff where it's not supposed to go, well, trouble might be brewing. I don't send pipes to Pennsylvania. It's asking for trouble. Pure and simple.
Abortion and porn are big swing issues now? What about those new fangled assault weapons? Or maybe letting Hawaii join the Union? You're in the 80's. No one gives a shit about porn or abortion, or gun control/ rights. The vast majority, on both sides, are more worried about basic freedoms and their money than they are about any of that. Sure, there are people out there that say "oh, candidate Q is pro- abortion/ pro- life. He's got my vote.". But they're few and far between and are frankly pretty marginalized.
It's the 2010's, Ted. Stop worrying about the personalities and start thinkingn about the issues.
_________________________
Having killed someone doesn't make you a killer- @KINGROCHE
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498663 - 10/07/10 10:21 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
@
Porn Jesus
Registered: 10/19/06
Posts: 9958
Loc: fortified
|
instead of rewriting history and all that i like to look at her tard kid and think that it has the same shoe tying ability right now that it will in forty years. it really is living in a certain state of bliss and of that i am jealous.
_________________________
i just lock, load, and regret. - jamesn
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498666 - 10/10/10 08:10 AM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 03/22/07
Posts: 5186
Loc: Joshua Tree National Park
|
If you don't get your economy out of the gutter there will be no such thing as an easy win for the Democrats in 2012. It might not matter who runs for the GOP (quite an accomplishment considering the GOP has spent the last 18 months playing with it's own feces).
_________________________
I would eat Allie Sin's asshole until I got an emotion out of her.-Jerkules
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#498667 - 10/14/10 04:12 PM
Re: President Palin: Good or Bad for Porn??
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 06/14/03
Posts: 449
|
US President Barack Obama is related to former Alaska governor Sarah Palin and radio host Rush Limbaugh, according to the family history website Ancestory.com that says Obama and Palin are distant cousins.
According to genealogists at Utah-based Ancestry.com, Obama and Palin are '10th cousins' and have a common ancestor named John Smith, who was a pastor and early settler in 17th-century Massachusetts. Obama is related to Smith through his mother and so is Palin, genealogist at Ancestry.com Anastasia Tyler said.
Apparently, Obama is also related to radio host and one of his relentless critics Limbaugh, who is a 10th cousin of the president. The two have a common ancestor named Richmond Terrell, who was a large landowner in Virginia and arrived in America in the mid-17th century.
Tyler explained that Ancestory.com examined family trees of the three, going back into history and looking for common surnames and locations, the Boston Globe said. "It is not unusual to find family members on different ends of the political spectrum," said Tyler. "This election season is an ideal time to look into the family trees of our candidates and their critics to learn more about the ties that make them all part of this great country."
The site also found that former President George Bush is related to both Obama and Palin. Obama and Bush are 11th cousins through common ancestor Samuel Hinckley, while Bush and Palin are 10th cousins one time removed, also through Hinckley. The site said Hinckley was John Smith's father-in-law.
Ancestry.com has revealed in the past that Obama is related to investor Warren Buffett and actor Brad Pitt. It has also found that Palin is a distant cousin of both Franklin D Roosevelt and Princess Diana.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (AnthonyBac),
241
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
