... if the reason you're doing it is to protest against it.

Check out this link:

http://myspace.com/flyntrapedher

View this accounts pics. People have had accounts deleted for less explicit pics than this account contains. I recall Sierra Sinn having her's deleted because you could barely see her nipple in one pic.

So why is showing pictures involving nudity and sex okay when you're doing it to protest it?

It will probably be deleted soon.

Actually, they have been up for a while. I was going to do a thread about this a few months back, but figured the pics would be deleted shortly after I did. I reported them to see if they would be taken down.

Checked back today to see if they were still up, and they were.

What kind of crap is that?

I never clicked your link so I guess I'm not qualified to speculate.

Moronboy do you think something evil is afoot?

No evil afoot, but it just kinda annoys me that they are willing to bend there porn for anti-porn people.

If some TV show decided to show how how disgusting, dangerous, and harmful to our children porn was by playing a complete and uncensored Max Hardcore scene, would the FCC just let it slide because the show in question said they were against that kind of thing?

More than likely, no. I just wondering why Myspace doesn't think the same thing.

Rupert Murdoch can get away with anything to fit his agenda.

Judging from what I've been seeing on MySpace recently, they have either relaxed their standards for images or else they have become much less vigilant. It goes across the entire board, and doesn't appear to just be any special treatment applied for people with a particular agenda.

What kind of torture would it be to be stuck talking to a cunt that posts shit like this:

Quote:

---

I recommend The Sexual Politics of Meat -- extraordinary. If you haven't read it already, you should. Read the whole thing though.

---

Fuck I wish Max was a free man....