Tamp Bay Online

The actual order handed down is a pdf upper right.

That bitch Buckalew obviously has her own personal vendetta here.

Thanks Paully!

That judge is an assbleeding cunt. How long did this procedure take? 5 minutes? Every ground for appeal is just shot as 'not a likely cause for reversal'.

All the best to Max and his defense team.

Quote:

---

Little's attorneys stated in a motion that they plan to appeal Little's conviction on seven grounds, including the argument that federal obscenity laws violate the right to sexual privacy and are "unworkable when applied on the Internet."

---

I'm totally on Max's side, of course, but this is just ridiculous.

what a bitch. When Max does win this on appeal, will she be held accountable at all for this farce of a trial? probably not.
hang in there Max

Isn't it interesting that the trial judge gets to decide whether or not Max Hardcore's issues are likely to win on appeal. I believe that the sage of Baltimore once said that a judge is a law student who gets to grade his own exams. Did I get that right, JimB?

Yep, Ivor, he did. Can't blame her, though. I mean, what Judge is going to admit that she knowingly deprived a defendant of the right to a fair trial.

Just out of curiosity, when (Not if...) Max finally beats this charge, can he take this judge on in Civil court? Because I personally would love to see Max fuck this judge in the ass the right way.

Through her wallet.

Wonderful way to spend tax dollars, its a shame when spiritual beliefs get mixed in with government, its really utopian to hope church and state remain seperate- but it was the founding principles of this country.

However, the Court acknowledged "the inherent dangers of undertaking to regulate any form of expression," and said that "State statutes designed to regulate obscene materials must be carefully limited." The Court, in an attempt to set such limits devised a set of three criteria which must be met in order for a work to be legitimately subject to state regulation:

the average person, applying contemporary community standards (not national standards, as some prior tests required), must find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;

the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions[1] specifically defined by applicable state law; and
the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

Excerpt releated to the legal judgement regaurding Larry Flynt. Flynt doesnt sell his smack in Cincinnati now. Thats all.

When Jesus comes to blow up earth maybe a few people out there believe bringing down porn films will save them.

hogwash
This cunt in florida,an anita bryant loving hag judge will be over-ruled.
She is flexing for local purity points knowing that she will be over ruled.


sirkin should present a dvd of cannibal holocaust or men behind the sun and ask the appeals judge why it isn't deemed obscene as well?

p little-out in 4-6 provided the election isn't stolen by the defense/oil/drug/pharma cartel known as the bush crime family aka the illuminati/the new world order,republicans etc etc.