.
XXX Porn Talk Navigation Home The Message Board Chat Room Chat Transcripts Contact Information Log In/Out
.
JM Toys and More!!
JM Toys and More!!
New Release This Week
New DVD Release at JerkOffZone.com
VOD / Download Links
JM Downloads/VOD
XPT VOD
Gamelink VOD
New Release This Week
New DVD Release at JerkOffZone.com
Internet Video Rentals
Sugar DVD
Bush DVD
Adult Gossip & News
TRPWL.com
LukeIsBack
TheFloatingWorld
GramPonante.com
Forum Stats
19073 Members
14 Forums
40349 Topics
614156 Posts

Max Online: 639 @ 01/18/23 06:59 AM
Topic Options
#246703 - 05/25/07 12:12 AM more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
Big Calm Offline
Gay For Pay

Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 900
Loc: Dallas, TX
I hardly remember viewing Porn in the 80's/90's and seeing an anal creampies. Even when you check the talent agencies there are a handful of females that perform creampies and fewer that will do anal creampies.

Then there's Aurora Jolie (Nicara) that only does anal no vag.


She just finished a new flick in which she does an anal creampie in every scene.

Cum in my Booty ....Sorry about the B Pumper music.

I would think that anal creampies would be the greater risk.



Attachments
236032-aj.jpg (24 downloads)



Edited by Big Calm (05/25/07 12:15 AM)

Top
#246704 - 05/25/07 01:44 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
JRV Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 08/03/03
Posts: 5849
Loc: TX, USA
Quote:


I would think that anal creampies would be the greater risk.




The best CDC estimate I know of says anal sex is 5x riskier. But I don't think they're talking creampies...

My favorites are the ones like Tyla Wynn that state "Creampie (Anal Only)". And Tyla isn't the only one. I guess they don't want to get pregnant?
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock

Top
#246705 - 05/25/07 02:48 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
fuckwhore Offline
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch

Registered: 02/18/07
Posts: 376
Quote:

Quote:


I would think that anal creampies would be the greater risk.




The best CDC estimate I know of says anal sex is 5x riskier. But I don't think they're talking creampies...

My favorites are the ones like Tyla Wynn that state "Creampie (Anal Only)". And Tyla isn't the only one. I guess they don't want to get pregnant?




Anal creampies are more dangerous. I believe the majority of the girls that got HIV from Marc Wallace and Darren James was from anal creampie. I might be wrong but that's what I read.

Top
#246706 - 05/25/07 05:24 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
The Ghost Is Toast Offline
Whoremaster

Registered: 10/21/05
Posts: 2710
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


I would think that anal creampies would be the greater risk.




The best CDC estimate I know of says anal sex is 5x riskier. But I don't think they're talking creampies...

My favorites are the ones like Tyla Wynn that state "Creampie (Anal Only)". And Tyla isn't the only one. I guess they don't want to get pregnant?




Anal creampies are more dangerous. I believe the majority of the girls that got HIV from Marc Wallace and Darren James was from anal creampie. I might be wrong but that's what I read.




Don't know about the details of the Wallice outbreak, but the Darren James one was definitely down to anal creampies. It should be noted though that said anal creampies either took place a) in Brazil, shooting bareback with local talent (James contracted HIV from Brazilian starlet Bianca Biaggi, who in turn got it from a tranny) or b) directly after/during double anal penetration (remember, the majority of the cases/transmissions can be traced back to a movie called 'Split That Booty 2' wherein the emphasis is on double anal) or c) a combination of both.

I believe that in the 'Porn Shutdown' documentary that aired, Kayla Marie states that the reason she dodged the bullet on this one is because James came in her pussy and not her ass.

Extreme sex acts like double anal (or excessively rough anal) lead to minute tears and fissures in the anal cavity walls, meaning the chances of fluid to fluid transmission are increased far above the (already sizeable) regular anal creampie risk.

This is why companies like Evil Angel don't shoot anal creampies...John and Tricia have both learnt first hand precisely how risky it can be. It's 100% risk free if neither party has HIV, but if you're shooting in some third world backwater like Brazil where life is cheap and people are more than happy to look the other way, do you really want to roll the dice? The porn industry's previous experience should tell us that the answer is a resounding 'No!'.

But TT Boy and Co. went ahead and did it anyway....and I seriously doubt they will be the last ones either.

Top
#246707 - 05/25/07 09:16 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
k1ng Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 03/22/06
Posts: 6557
Loc: 2004 - the glory days
she's got nice cans
_________________________
"You are the worst poster in xpt yet I can't stop talking about you" - smelly monkey

Top
#246708 - 05/25/07 11:38 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
weeeee Offline
Kurt Lackwood's Fluffer

Registered: 01/09/06
Posts: 1248
What's all this crap about risk and AIDs? There's a bigger and more important issue Miss Jolie is addressing here and that is virginity is SPECIAL. You fools never stopped once to consider this fine young lady would have the class and moral fiber to keep it in tact, did you?

http://whoreoftheday.com/category/aurora-jolie/

Top
#246710 - 05/25/07 11:52 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
Vizzle Offline
Porn Fucking Master

Registered: 10/30/06
Posts: 3812
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
Quote:

What's all this crap about risk and AIDs? There's a bigger and more important issue Miss Jolie is addressing here and that is virginity is SPECIAL. You fools never stopped once to consider this fine young lady would have the class and moral fiber to keep it in tact, did you?

http://whoreoftheday.com/category/aurora-jolie/




Thanks for the video. This whore is far too stupid to live. I think she needs put to sleep.

_________________________
"You know this is XXXPornTalk.com right? You sound like an ADT person. I want to poop on you." -Malice

Top
#246711 - 05/25/07 11:54 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
pinupmutant Offline
Bukkake Boy

Registered: 06/13/06
Posts: 611
My understanding is that the "cream" in a creampie is actually pina colada mixture. Inserting a sugar-filled substance in your cooch with a turkey baster will cause irritation and discomfort at best; and at worst, it will cause a yeast infection. So it's best to save the cream for the cooch's hardy neighbor, the poop chute.

Top
#246712 - 05/25/07 11:59 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
smutpeddler Offline
Rob Black's Crack Pipe

Registered: 04/24/07
Posts: 117
Loc: md
i stick with the hostess fruit pies and their icing deliciousness

Top
#246713 - 05/25/07 05:23 PM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
Dick Dastardly Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 01/25/06
Posts: 4470
I do not wish to see creep sludge dripping from whore's orafices. It should be directly deposited intheir mouth, ONLY, and swallowed.

That's all.
_________________________
Because you already yelled 'dropping prices!!!' after Red Light canned you. - Gia Jordan to Brandon Iron

Top
#246714 - 05/25/07 06:40 PM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
k1ng Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 03/22/06
Posts: 6557
Loc: 2004 - the glory days


_________________________
"You are the worst poster in xpt yet I can't stop talking about you" - smelly monkey

Top
#246715 - 05/25/07 07:08 PM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
k1ng Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 03/22/06
Posts: 6557
Loc: 2004 - the glory days




I'm putting these on my resume when I apply for a position at BET.


_________________________
"You are the worst poster in xpt yet I can't stop talking about you" - smelly monkey

Top
#246716 - 05/26/07 01:15 PM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
jamesn Offline
Porn Jesus

Registered: 04/17/04
Posts: 6005
Loc: travieso capital management an...
i'm on the vineyard and there's this horribly elitist network that serves here, vail, the hamptons, etc. trying to replace local access called the plum network. it's hilarious because they've got high production values, but the problem is the vineyard really has no interesting content, so it's all of this great editing and sound for like, hippies being interviewed about their windfarms or "juan's basement" where some guy plays his guitar.

anyhow, the guy who founded BET lives on the island in the summers and some little shit who's obviously a summer-intern is giving him SO much thinly-veiled shit about selling out to the whitest, most jewish man ever. it was comedy, he was so black and angry but there were sailboats going by in the background that didn't contain slaves.

but yes. sumner redstone owns BET. comedy.

here's the website i highly suggest you watch if you ever get the chance. it's like advertisements for banks/firms private wealth groups breaking up a hs football game or some dumb bitch interviewing the owner of a fudge/ice cream store about absolutely nothing.


Edited by jamesn (05/26/07 01:20 PM)
_________________________
"She has no waist, no arse...an interesting face...but all we are really worshipping is two bags of silicone"

Martin Amis "honoring" katie price with a character bearing some of her traits

Top
#246717 - 05/26/07 11:19 PM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
Gigi Offline
Porn Fucking Master

Registered: 05/18/06
Posts: 3555
here's an old post that discusses this...

CHATSWORTH, Calif. - [Ed. Note: The following letter was written by adult director Rodney Moore. By publishing this letter unedited, AVN.com does not necessarily endorse or substantiate any of the beliefs expressed by Moore.For people reading this that are not familiar with the adult industry, a "creampie" is an internal ejaculation.]

I’m very surprised that with all the comments about the current HIV crisis in the adult industry that no one has yet stated what appears to be obvious to me.

The cause of all of these problems is the “anal creampie” shot. Let’s look at the facts. The number one means of sexual transmission is infected semen in the anus. HIV is hard to get. It needs a direct pathway into the bloodstream. There is no more direct path than an infected male cumming into the anus of another person, especially after said anus has been roughly pounded for 20-30 minutes, an activity for which it was not intended. My opinion is that female to maletransmission is rare.

Let’s look at more facts. I’ve been through several of these unfortunate scares in my twelve years in the business. Someone has to bring the virus in from the outside. When the scare involved a female such as Barbara Doll or Nena Cherry, no one else was infected. And we didn't have the quick quarantine measures in place like we do now.

On the other hand, five years ago when Mark Wallice was "patient zero," he infected several women. None of the women who became infected gave it to anyone else. I know for a fact he infected Brooke Ashley by cumming into her ass after an anal gangbang. I don?t know for a fact how the other girls got it from him, but I would suspect it was from anal creampies.

At that time five years ago, I had unprotected anal sex with Brooke Ashley the day before she tested positive! This was when she was at her most infectious stage, and I did not get it. I worried plenty, I placed myself under quarantine for a long time, but I did not get it. Maybe I was just lucky. Or maybe that’s not an easy way of transmission. I believe the latter.

I don’t want to get in the middle of the debate as to who gave it to who between Lara Rox and Darren James. But sadly, there is no doubt that Darren James gave it to Jessica. Lara did not give it to Jessica.

They did not have sex. In either case, at least one of the girls got it from an anal creampie.

I don?t know if he wants it still public, but there's a well known adult company owner and former performer who by his own admission got it from semen in his butt from an infected transsexual prostitute.

So I’m back to the original point. The cause of all this unfortunate misery and grief in the industry is the anal creampie shot. What's especially sad is that it is the easiest thing in the world to fake.

You put a little of your favorite imitation semen mixture in the butt, the guy goes back in and fakes an orgasm, pulls out, and out comes what looks to be semen. Why then are some directors compelled to film this highly dangerous activity?

In my opinion, the most realistic solution to the preventing future Outbreaks of HIV in the industry is to BAN THE ANAL CREAMPIE.

We don?t need condoms. Besides, a guy can wear three condoms and it doesn't accomplish anything if the director than tells him to whip them off and shoot his load into the girl?s butt! It doesn?t accomplish anything if the condom breaks inside and cum enters the butt anyway.

Especially if people stop testing and rely solely on condoms, which is what will happen. It’s about Anal Creampies.

We don't need talent trade unions. They may be a good idea for other reasons, but with so many female performers dropping in and out of the business on a daily basis and people shooting all over the world, it's just not possible to involve everyone who works as talent. What purpose will it serve if at best you can only involve a small portion of the talent pool. And even if you could involve everyone, it?s not going to stop HIV transmission. It?s about Anal Creampies.

We don?t need to quarantine performers who do scenes out of the country. Why is a guy who works with a tested actress in Brazil more dangerous than a guy who stays in America but fucks some untested girl he picks up in a bar in LA? And a bi-curious male performer can just as easily take it up the butt in West Hollywood as he can in the Czech

Republic or Brazil. I am not implying anything about anyone here so don't think that I am, I?m just making a point. It?s about Anal Creampies.

We certainly don?t need directors with self-serving agendas strutting around saying they care so much about the talent that they?re going condom only and insulting other directors by implicitly implying that if other directors don?t, then they don?t care as much. It?s about Anal Creampies.

We don't need OSHA to come in and make condoms mandatory and drive the business underground or out of state, where testing will be abandoned and filmed sex will become even more riskier. It?s about Anal Creampies.

If OSHA feels compelled now to do something, then they should BAN ANAL CREAMPIE SHOTS!

If the industry as a whole feels the need to do something, we should BAN ANAL CREAMPIE SHOTS!

I'm not blaming any directors who in the past have shot anal creampies.Even those who have touted in their promos that their girls are so stupid they'll do such risky activity just for a buck.

But I truly believe that from this point on, any company or director that shoots an anal creampie should be condemned for not just putting the girl at risk, but the entire industry. Any girl that agrees to do an anal creampie shot in the future is either uninformed or just fucking stupid.

I believe Sharon Mitchell should take down that bullshit “No Soliciting” sign at AIM that a certain well know talent agent made her put up and replace it with a huge sign that says: DO NOT DO ANAL CREAMPIES!

It's tragic that the reckless quest to get an edge on the competition has put our industry in jeopardy and caused so much grief and pain.

Again, I'm not blaming anyone. But surely now we all know better. Let's see if we have learned. I sympathize not only with the three people who are infected but also the others on the list who are so scared waiting for the final outcome of their tests.

One final thing. At the risk of sounding self-serving myself, I would estimate that in the history of the adult video industry, well over 100,000 facial cumshots have been filmed. I know of not one single case of HIV transmission resulting from a facial cumshot.

We all know that of the hundreds of Bukkakes that have been shot in the last few years by several different directors, there have been times when untested actors have been used. And yet, not one of the girls doing

Bukkake has ever come up positive. I'm not defending Bukkake. It's personally not my thing. I am defending the facial cumshot.

I repeat no one in this industry has ever come up HIV positive from a facial cumshot. Is this self serving? Do I have an agenda? Yes, since I make my living on facial cumshots. But if I made my living shooting anal creampies, the last anal creampie I shot would be the last anal creampie I ever shot.

I sincerely hope everyone else will say the same.



_________________________
"I'm going to spend the rest of the weekend deep frying the fuck out of anything that gets in my way." --Handful

Top
#246718 - 05/27/07 03:43 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
The Ghost Is Toast Offline
Whoremaster

Registered: 10/21/05
Posts: 2710
The basis of what Rodney is saying correct, but he is mistaken about the supposed safety of facial cumshots.

If a girl gets some in her eye, then there are millions of tiny blood vessels, capillaries and veins in what is called the 'optic membrane' by which occular HIV transmission is theoretically possible (although as far as I am aware, there have never been any reported cases of it). The risks associated are therefore incredibly low, but given that it is someone's health at stake, I don't see any good reason to roll the dice and shoot facial content with untested performers.

This is why condom-only scenes that end in a facial are bullshit...there is always the possibility that, despite every effort on the part of the male performer to shoot at a certain area of the face, a stray spurt might find some way into the girl's eye, thus negating any supposed extra protection the condom was supposed to offer.

Top
#246719 - 05/30/07 07:33 AM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
Mike Meatmaster Offline
Pervert

Registered: 05/31/03
Posts: 2211
Loc: TX
Quote:

Quote:


I would think that anal creampies would be the greater risk.




The best CDC estimate I know of says anal sex is 5x riskier. But I don't think they're talking creampies...

My favorites are the ones like Tyla Wynn that state "Creampie (Anal Only)". And Tyla isn't the only one. I guess they don't want to get pregnant?




Tyla did though do a 5 guy (vaginal) creampie recently, though I believe she went right out for the morning after pill.
_________________________
Formerly Pornfanintx

Top
#246720 - 06/06/07 11:50 PM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
2Dogs Offline
Ed Hardy Wearing Loser

Registered: 10/20/06
Posts: 31
uhhh don't these stupid fucking whores take birf cunt roll?

Top
#246721 - 06/07/07 03:27 PM Re: more dangerous creampies or anal creampies?
Jizz-Tastic Offline
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch

Registered: 03/07/07
Posts: 357
Loc: Washington DC
um- both r dangerous for STD's-
but hey,
relax. Its not your daughter!
_________________________
<- Great Body, Fuck Yeahhh!!!!!!!!!!

Top



Moderator:  Jerkules, zenman 
Shout Box

JM Productions
JM Productions Official Home is the JerkOffZone.com
Gag Factor
Yeah, it's that fucked up!!
American Bukkake
Tap into your inner degenerate!!
JM has the Best Variety !!
JM Video Lines
Who's Online
1 registered (1 invisible), 211 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod