My blog this week may be a bit boring if you want to read about gaping assholes, bitches gagging on cock and nasty ass to mouth fun. Next week I promise not to let you down. Imagine Ann Coulter in Meatholes!

As a independent thinker, in a distinctly stuffy
"liberal" environment I have to shake my head at
the Golden Gate Bridge transit district, and their recently
proposed 2 million dollar study
to look into the feasibility of providing a suicide barrier on the Golden Gate
Bridge. Who needs a study? Wouldn't these funds be better
spent in the decrepit bay area public schools?
Take Tom Ammino in a cable car limo, equipped with
homo erotic men wearing seven jeans
and look at the bridge's classic design for 10 seconds. Take
a sip of Perrier and decide. It's either going to make
the bridge ugly and undesirable to tourists or it's not. But
tourists, who cares about them? They pay $7 to hang off
a cable car and only provide the city with millions in sales
tax revenue, we wouldn't want that would we? As liberals wouldn't
you want to protect the rights of people to kill themselves? You already
do this for the unborn and the elderly.

I would argue that every urban area needs to provide the population
with adequate "suicide landmarks" that uplift the soul
and benefit the public good. The
Golden Gate Bridge is a fairly safe suicide destination. Not once
has an attempted suicide caused a delay for me in crossing the
Golden Gate Bridge. Not once has a suicidal bridge jumper's
body hit a cargo container, ruining ipods heading to the
Port of Oakland. We only have to look at the recent
Amtrack derailment in Southern California to look at the damage a lack
of suitable suicide structures can cause. Had the Hollywood sign
been available for televised suicides, millions of dollars
of property damage, and many lives could have been saved. For those
poor suicidal souls living in the South Bay it's become a right of
passage into the next world to lay down on the Cal Train track, ending
your life and disrupting the commute of those heading to Palo Alto and
Menlo Park. I've personally experienced hours of confusion and
delay as a result.

2008 dominates the landscape all forms of popular culture and thought.
With sudden lesbian "centrist" Hillary Clinton looming large over the
future prospects of the democratic party, I suggest the grass
roots of their party reconsider their suicidal tendencies.
I'd put her odds at capturing the Presidency at 30%.

Perhaps Rosie and Ellen can use a dildo on Miss Clinton's ass and make her gape for her first debate...

Hillary's only hope is that the GOP nominate someone without a personality
who alieantes suburban women more than herself.
Someone like Bill Frist, someone marginalizeable such as John McCain,
a closeted internatioinalist like Newt Gingrigch
or a Rockefeller republican like George Pataki.

If the ever hardcore Bush Sr. is able to convince a smooth campaigner like his son Jeb
to come out of the closet
the race is over. Hillary may make it close, but suburban women, and a well
oiled GOP machine will be able to pull out another victory. Look for Jeb to
fall in 2012 to a ressurected Democratic Resistance Party.
And while a fourth Bush administration may be bad for the long term
health of the GOP, faced with the odds of a Hillary
Clinton presidency, the Evangelicals will rally around the father of our
future president, "the little brown one..."

If the democrats want to go for the jugular of Conservatism
The illegal immigrant issue is the one that they could do it with.
If a crazed eyed maverick democrat like Howard Dean
took it on he could excite people. The
ironic thing is a lot of democrats and liberals are anti immigration,
and this an issue that their party elite will never address. A bill
that would have allowed illiegal immigrants to vote in school board
elections failed in famously liberal San Francisco. Imagine how well
this would play in Michigan and Ohio. If they did somehow create a
protectionist,
anti immigration, pro national
health care policy they could win big. The liberalism of Europe is
usually smart enough to include some "fascist," or "protectionist"
rhetoric to keep the people excited and hyped up.

As Hollywood continually proves Liberals in America are often less
intelligent and out of touch with what consumers want, and less
successful at creating their utopian welfare state. A democrat telling the
people that their wages have decreased because of immigration, and
they cannot afford national health care without closing the border
with Mexico would excite people. This would strike at the very reason
socialism has failed in America

I don't foresee this happening, but
a pretty John Edwards style JFK, JR. clone who has some right wing issues
would be the ticket. I'm starting to shake my head at the budget deficits
that the president is running up. I'm not sure why
Liberals hate the President so much. Except for cultural overtones
George W Bush in some ways is the most liberal president ever.


xxx