Quote:

a. Did she get AIDS on the shoot or elsewhere?
Let's keep in mind that in civil cases you don't need absolute proof. Just proving that she probably caught it on the shoot is enough to meet this hurdle.


In a criminal case the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt". You never need absolute proof.

In a civil case like this it's "preponderance of the evidence", which I simplify as "more likely than not" (though lawyer friends dislike that).

Quote:

b. Is the Threat of AIDS something she accepts for being a pornstar?


There is bound to be a lot of case law on this from blue collar workers to professional athletes. I'd be surprised if this flew, especially without mitigation efforts by the producer and insurance/support plans to cover the consequences (i.e., if it really is an unavoidable risk shouldn't producer plan for that eventually?).

Quote:

c. Is a Pornstar a temp or a contractor?
Temps have more rights than contractors. This is why a lot of companies are outsourcing.


How is day labor treated? Hollywood extras? Case law ought to be well formed here.

Quote:

d. The composition of the jury. She is going to look pitiful and defenseless for the trial. How is TTboy going to look?


T.T. looks bad. Even if he can muddy the waters on who infected who, he's not going to be able to escape his past treatment others. And, he will be easy to rip apart on the stand. The only way to make her seem even worse is to show she was (or is!) a prostitute, maybe going bareback for more money.
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock