Quote:
Quote:
It is odd. Now NASA has released an official statement denying the claims.
What??? That proves they're hiding something!
Dude, don't be a fucking smart ass. The operative word is "now." It is odd that after these scientists evidently said these things, and their research shows what it does, that NASA would officially deny it.
Also, NASA almost never issues official denials about stuff like this. It is odd.
Context is everything.
Quote:
FYI I subscribe to the journal Nature mentioned in the original article and can look it up when published if someone reminds me. This kind of article isn't as hard to read as others.
She is now saying that there is no, nor was there ever, any article slated for Nature. Nature has ostensibly received nothing.
Quote:
The interesting part will be published in the issue after that when people starting sending in "Letter to the Editor" rebuttals... 
This phenomenon contributes to scientists being very guarded about new theories and results. Some anonymous no-namer can pick shit out and make spurious rebuttals. Even if incorrect, quantity and image is more important to publications like Nature, and you certainly won't get another article or a follow up published.
_________________________
you mean my days having fun while being fundamentally superior to you? - Jamesn