Rebuttal #1 (black guys whining).

100% of white female porn performers who do boy/girl, do white guys. Whereas, as Modelgig admitted, "there are a TON of porn girls that will not shoot interracial." If the situation were the reverse (100% of white females doing black guys, but TONS of them not working with white guys), white guys would be whining and you wouldn't hear a peep out of black guys. On a side note, the current situation with IR dodgers also means that far more movie choices are available for people who only want to see white-on-white than are available for people who only want to see interracial.

Rebuttal #2 (it's her body, her choice, her decision).

Whenever I read that, it is very obvious to me that the person is not finishing the sentence. What they're really saying is that "It's her body, her choice, her decision...to discriminate on the basis of race on the job." Many people view that as wrong. Whereas, defenders of IR dodgers seem to think that their reasoning is both right and valid (it's neither). This would become obvious to them if the IR dodging situation were the reverse (see Rebuttal #1).

Her body, her choice, her decision? Yes, whether or not a person engages in a wrongful practice is always their choice, their decision, but that doesn't make it right. The right to do something doesn't necessarily make it the right thing to do.

Rebuttal #3 (I'm pacing my career by delaying interracial).

Based on Rebuttal #2, that is an unethical business or marketing strategy prima facie. It also engenders a great deal of ill will, which is not wise from a business or career standpoint. Not doing anal or DP right away is one thing, delaying IR as a marketing strategy doesn't cut it.

Secondly, announcing that you intend to do interracial at some undetermined future date sets a bad precedence for other girls in porn. The net effect is that people (of all races) who are really wanting to see a particular girl do IR, might have to wait months (or even years in some cases) longer than is really necessary. This is not fair, because people who want to see white on white don't have to wait at all.

Thirdly, those girls who have no intention of ever doing IR, can conveniently say they're going to do IR someday in an attempt to deflect criticism for their current IR dodging. IR dodgers already have a long laundry list of ready-made excuses. This just gives them one more to add to the list.

Rebuttal #4 (some girls are not attracted to black guys).

Can somebody say Ron Jeremy, Randy West, and Ed Powers? White female porn stars routinely have sex on camera with white guys they're not sexually attracted to. Porn is about people paid to fuck. Whether or not a porn chick happens to be sexually attracted to her respective partner is coincidental (and ultimately irrelevant).

Rebuttal #5 (some girls only do girl/girl, does that mean they hate men?).

That's a red herring argument. The central issue is racial discrimination in the workplace. If a girl specializes in girl/girl, no problem as long as she doesn't discriminate against working with girls of any race. Similarly, if a girl specializes in boy/girl, no problem as long as she doesn't discriminate against working with guys of any race.

The issue of a girl's personal feelings about the opposite gender or another race is irrelevant, just as long as she doesn't racially discriminate. For example, there are many girls doing boy/girl porn who dislike or even hate men, but that doesn't stop them from working with them. This is not to imply that all IR dodgers dislike or hate blacks. Some do and some don't, just as, of the white women who *do* work with blacks, some like them and some don't.