Quote:

while the photo on that cover is professional and makes the girl look attractive, it's more artistic than it should be.



It's obviously a personal taste thing, but I have to disagree with you there. My comment had nothing to do with the "artistic" nature of the photo, and while it was a professionaly shot, I don't think the professional who did it has an eye for getting the best out of porn chicks. She looks pretty grim, IMO. From the bra down looks fine, upwards of that it's a disaster area. She has too little body fat to smooth out the boob job and flesh out her bony face.

Although I'm unlikely to ever find her attractive, I'm sure this girl could be made to look a lot better by the right photographer. A better bra to keep the bolt-ons under wraps, softer lighting and the right angle would make a world of difference. This photo just emphasises her worst features.

I love the way Vertigo dude tried to attribute my criticism to me having unsophisticated tastes. Newsflash: those photographers you bring in from non-porno fields obviously don't have the right experience buddy. Go take a look at some Zero Tolerance or Sineplex covers and see how it's done.
_________________________
"If I were a guy, not swallowing would be a deal breaker. So what if you cook and clean? I can get a maid for that." - Gia Jordan