Quote:

"We'll be calling for a reversal of the result based on evidence developed in the course of litigation,"


Translation: "We don't have a shred of evidence. But we're just sure we'll come up with something if you agree that our unsubstantiated claims deserve a trial."

Quote:

"Exit polling and substantial irregularities excluded votes that should have been counted."


Huh? How does exiting polling exclude voters? And what does exit polling have to do with elections anyway?

Quote:

There is evidence that votes cast for one candidate were moved to the column of the other candidate."


Isn't that what recounts are for?

Quote:

Exit polls on election day suggested that the election could be heading towards a Kerry victory, deepening the despair in Democratic ranks at the Bush win. The anomaly was blamed on the exit polls, but Mr Arnebeck argued that it was evidence of malpractice.


Now I agree with him. It is malpractice to based election expectations on exit polls and Tarot cards instead of actual ballots cast.
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock