what the fuck? the two conversion charts i could find max out at 140 for 1600, which i didn't get. nada for lsats or gres. apparently chickenmaster is considered "highest genius" and kicks ass versus linus pauling, bobby fischer, and most nobel prize winners. wittgenstein, who i'm convinced is probably the smartest person we know of is projected to be 5 points higher, the rest of my pantheon, Leibniz and goethe are right at the mid 180's. it seems there's a solid argument about modern scores above 145 being inflated, the woman claiming to have 228 is a joke. anything above 200 is defined as immesurable and most close to it are adjusted downwards by 20 or more points. what a mess that test is, geena davis is in mensa and some of the tests they accept AVERAGE over 125. this doesn't apply to chickenmaster, as i think he's very smart despite my fear his enthusiasm will end up leading a cult to mass-suicide at some point, but most people who brag about their iq usually are twats who never figure out how to excel at anything.
nobody ever mentioned stuff like that in college except the people whose greatest achievement was getting into said university and would ride what they did at 17 through adulthood. i'm sure it can tell you who is retarded on the low end not much else. kinda the same as the sats--i can't think of anyone i think is smart who scored absurdly low and predictably whined, but into the 1500+ range the only difference is who had a better breakfast that day, although none are morons. well, some are sociopaths, but pretty much literate.

strangely enough, the smartest kid i know who was undefeated versus the college board dropped outta caltech, got bitten by a bat and had to be hunted down by the cops to make sure he didn't have rabies. the experience was apparently so horrific that he's slyvia plathing it at mcclean's where the rich and famous get institutionalized. he's totally shitting the bed despite being a genius and having a dad worth somewhere north of 140million, i think i'd shrug off bats