(My Response)

Impressive, I have a big grin on my face. You are correct but failed to see my point or perhaps you did see my point but I still feel the need to clarify what I have said. I wasn't mis-directed in my black statement, here let me put it this way with one of your quotes.

"The majority of voters, 75%, are non-hispanic white people.
As well, the majority of voters are more educated."

Do you see what you've just said?

"Is he anti-religion?"

Yes, most definitely. Anyone who would systematically isolate and dehumanize the Christians; that's as bigass warning flag. My statement about Blacks was on purpose generlized and misguiding. Just like Moores are, to categorically lump "Christians" into one group dehumanizes them and puts a easy label to target a group of individuals. Did you know the Orthodox Jew's voted for Bush as well? More than two-thirds (69%) of Orthodox Jews voted for Bush. Better put a label on them as well. Whatever state, county or region they come from is obviously Semite land and we are over here in the elite United States of Canada. See what I'm pushing at? No matter how popular his books are the underlying message is what matters.

Another example is the fight against terrror. Are all Mulsims terrorists? The US media has a bad habit of painting all Muslims as terroists. Do I really need to explain this any further to you?

All I'm saying applying labels, even if your message before was right, is wrong. Any respect I had for Moore was completely lost when he put up that war like boundary setting picture. You don't think people like Moore were behind Hitlers campaign of death? I'll give you a couple names to think about: Leni Riefenstahl, Hans Fritzsche, Dr. Goebbels. All three with the same misguided fervor as Moore all thought their message was the right one, and they influenced many millions.