michael moore's specialty is character assassination and getting dumb people riled up. everything about his actual work is considered amateurish and lowbrow in the world of academia. the only discussion about him is the success he's had dogmatically riling up the chicken coop of the semi-informed. bush isn't great, but how hard is it to attack someone who's lived their life on record and in public view since his 20's? not hard and most former presidents would be just as vulnerable to attack had their tenures had the levels of near-total exposure today's news channels provide. motherfuckers probably couldn't identify a picture of the president with great accuracy pre-1900.