You don't pretend to know what level of regulation is valid? Statist! STATIST!!! LIBTARD!!!! COMMUNIST TWINKLE TOED FAGGOT!!!! STOP STEREOTYPING ME!!!
All I know is the level of government YOU support is all bad your THE REGRESSIVE LEFT!!!!!!1!1!1!1!2!

The Trump is deliberately self destructing. Dementia is not a credible explanation. He wants out. I put my money on June 6th. Closest without going over wins.

How do you define "market"?

I want a tax system that makes the super rich and corporations pay their fair share, and favors the middle class. And I want the tax money to go to programs for the people, not giveaways for lobbyists and the MIC..

I'll take the Fourth of July.

That sounds totally reasonable. It sounds like backdoor man is making a lot of assumptions and comparing apples to elephants . He acts like such a conservatard. I really wish he'd stop sterotyping

July 14, Bastille Day.

LOL I wonder what that retrograde mongoloid Fiend thinks about Jeff Sessions statements about ramping up the drug war and wants prosecutors and judges to impose that harshest possible sentences for drug users. Still sporting your NORML banner on whatever moronic red piller sub Reddit you ooze around now you fucking retard? No actually I doubt you think very hard about much of anything because you're a fucking idiot. Fuck you. I hope die in prison from getting your guts ripped out through your asshole by big niGGGer cock.

^ I'm certain he still thinks he's "winning", and still has no idea how Sheenishly ridiculous that idea is. You could always write to him c/o Breitbart, and find out.

I'd like to ask you to define the "fair share", and while you're at it, please explain your reasoning why a tax system should favor a certain class of taxpayers. If we're favoring, why not favor the poor? Why the middle class? That is in fact where the money is.

Those of us in the top one percent of income taxpayers pay almost half of ALL taxes (income, sales, property, etc.) in the United States, while our share of national income is smaller than 18%. So in fact we bear a disproportionate share of the current tax burden. Yet you want more. How much more will satisfy you?

When people bleat about the "unfairness" of Warren Buffett paying income tax at an effective rate lower than that paid by his secretary, it sure does sound like a call for a flat income tax. Why can't we have the flat tax? Is the answer "no" simply because we want it?

Even pew research which you cuntservaturds seem to love says you're massively full of shit

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/201...ugh-to-be-fair/

You don't actually give a shit vice admiral and just want to sit there and be a smarmy prick but the short answer is that the benefits the ultra rich get from the bottom rung of society far out weigh the tax burden they've put into it. And you've also business's disproportionately benefit from public utilities like roads, water, power, etc. will usually get tax breaks in exchange for lowering wages and reduced safety laws and how shittily they can get away with treating employees.
And let's leave out the argument for a second of "what defines a rich person" and just use the far more defined dividing line of the extreme ultra rich like one percent of the one present. If you want to cry that the richest people pay almost all the taxes it's also true that a tiny microscopic fraction of the population literally holds more assets than the bottom half of the population of the entire planet. But you'd just say "it's the natural progression of capitalism" as if it's some kind of "natural" system and not manipulated by design. It's hysterical when people like you say things like "big government is anti capitalism" the capitalists ARE the fucking government. This discussion has been done a thousand times far better by people much smarter than either of us but in the end you don't give a shit anymore than you give a shit what your maid or whore thinks. You just want to hear yourself talk. Why would you care? You're already rich. You're the kind of person who defends sweatshops because "those are the best jobs they could get and if they didn't make 34 cents an hour they'd only be making 20 so I reality, the capitalist is compassionate! The fumes in this factory will only cause cancer by age 45 instead of 30!"

So are you going to let me know how much is "enough". or not?

We had a good, progressive tax system before Rayguns. And a strong middle class. That's what built America after WW2.

With the advances in automation, we need a guaranteed minimum income of about $25k. And a $15 minimum wage.

We must stop spending half our money on war.

Hmm let me think. You want some exact figure? This is kind of like when the right wingers say "I'm for SENSIBLE regulation" as they gut the EPA and appoint a former oil
Company head to run it? ( sounds like something out of a movie). I don't have your precise to the third decimal point amount calculated but I can tell you this much....

.... we need enough so that puerto rico shouldn't have to shut down 184 public schools because they are a lousy 70 billion dollars in debt while simultaneously we are talking about adding 54 billion dollars EVERY YEAR to defense spending ONTOP of the gigantic amount that wevalrwad are spending.... a situation that was caused by Puerto Rico being a tax haven in the first place and now the scum fuck corporate raiders are moving into the next host the suck dry.

....maybe it not so much how much were are taxed as how its spent. Until we can stop talking about slashing programs that help those on the bottom while calling them lazy welfare cheats as we give subsidies to billion dollar corporations and defense mercenaries and weapons manufacturers, you're not paying enough....... and a million other examples you could come up with but the school shut down was just fresh in my mind.

You know this is a garbage debate anyways as someone who claims to be as smart as you are tries to sneak in that Bullshit "flat tax" statement. You know damn well flat taxes are actually regressive taxes just like sales taxes are. You are a totally dishonest slimy shyster lawyer shitbag, go figure.

Okay. Let's pick a source you find credible. How about The American Conservative?

Trump Attempts to Blackmail Comey. Really!

Or how about the Murdoch-Owned Wall Street Journal?

Former Employees of Trump Saw Him Tape Conversations

Hey wait, I've got some sources for backdoor man. The communist twinkle toed faggots at the CATO institute talk about how the Muslims and Mexicants are coming to enslave us!


https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/terrorism-immigration-risk-analysis

"Chances of being killed in the United States by a foreign terrorist is 1 in 3.6 million a year.

The chances of being murdered in the United States by a refugee is 1 in 3.6 BILLION a year.


The chances of being murders by an illegal alien is 1 in 10.9 BILLION per year"

Can't fucking copy and paste.

But they're job creators!!

Trump is going to get us all killed.

"Pay Trump Bribes Here" Projected Onto President's DC Hotel
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/05/16/pay-trump-bribes-here-projected-presidents-dc-hotel

I'm pretty sure that's criminal trespass.

Maybe vandalism. Anyway, it's a crime.

Speaking of crimes -

So fucking what?

No just kind of Petty,Kind of like you.!

Something you might see with school children or Homosexuals.Your reaction shows one of many classic symptoms of TARD.

-Acute change in demeanor from pompous and arrogant to fearful and combative.

Any luck finding a job yet?
Yea I didn't think so.Fucking Dead-Weight piece of shit..

A digital projection? Please cite the relevant statute. TIA.

Aaaand, speaking of projections, here's the poodle killer projecting his insecurities. Again:

District of Columbia Code Section 22-3312.01. Defacing public or private property.

It shall be unlawful for any person or persons willfully and wantonly to...write, mark, draw, or paint, without the consent of the owner or proprietor thereof...any word, sign, or figure upon:

(1) Any property, public or private, building...or facility, dwelling or structure of any kind including those in the course of erection; or

(2) The doors, windows, steps, railing, fencing, balconies, balustrades, stairs, porches, halls, walls, sides of any enclosure thereof, or any movable property.

We don't have clear precedent about this exact act of projecting images onto a building, but we do know that chalk markings, which are not permanent, are included in the scope of graffiti which is prosecutable. But chalk markings are physically real, whereas light images are not.

Except... That's a light projection. Not applicable. Try again.

Kind of wonder if libel or slander law would be applicable.

Why ya wanna be censoring free speech bro? Need a safe space SJW? Don't be a cuck.

While I agree with the sentiment, if not the "fiend"-ish wording of License Plate's response, the answer to your question is a resounding no. As the most public figure in the known universe, it's fair commentary. Moreover, defamation is a civil, not a criminal matter.

More importantly, as License Plate notes, you guys sound REALLY desperate and weak with that whine.

Meh I'm not whining at all about any of the attacks on Trump. I think the scale of delusion on the left more than "trumps" it.
I find it highly entertaining.

^ Indeed. Sooooo, about all those jobs you deluded yourselves into believing he saved:

Drumpf deal to "save" US Jobs sends 600 to Mexico

^ I see the Damsels of Drumpfworld have fully embraced Mafia Widow Chic.

I like how they left enough room between trumpki and the pope for us to shop in a pic of poutine.

And then some...

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/27/trump-paris-climate-deal-238883
Leaders issue G7 declaration with U.S. a holdout on climate change. Trump posted on Twitter that he'll make a final decision next week, after he returns to Washington.

Vigo and Lo Pan are the best parts