The notion that progressives are more intelligent is fucking hilarious.

More educated is a simple fact, no one claims more intelligent. (unless they don't understand the distinction)

I understand the distinction and have heard enough Trump-supporting nitwits to assert that Trump had substantial support among the less intelligent.

Clearly the Democrats are a bunch of geniuses. It came out today that John Podesta, the main guy claiming the Russians hacked his emails, had set his email account's password to the word "password."

No email servers have allowed that to be used as a password for years now. I would check the validity of that "news" item.

But yes, there are millions of idiots with higher education degrees out there regardless of their liberal/conservative labels.

And many of them were, and are, running the DNC. The fact that I loathe her less than Drumpf doesn't make me a supporter of $hillary. Of course, one of the hallmarks of actual intelligence is the ability to think beyond either/or logic and, so far, I have yet to see the Drumpf blowhards make that distinction.

^Well then you are clearly either being willfully obtuse or you just aren't paying attention.

^ I knew I could count on you, Steez.

This blog post nails it.

The thing that makes bubbles worse

Here's the article it refers to. Also a good read.

Real America and pick up trucks

:crickets:

^Lies! All lies! Hugest crowd ever!

The purpose of the press conference wasn't to whine about the crowd size. That was just the McGuffin. This was a message to the media that, unlike other Republican administrations in recent history, this one will fight back when the media intentionally tries to mislead the people.

No, the crowd was not the largest ever but it was larger than what the medias was giving it the appearance of being.

Favorite Trump moment so far was him calling out CNN at the last press conference for being, "fake news."

Glad to see you've got a sense of humor about it, Brudda.

^ Definitely. I think all of this is really quite amusing, actually. But if you don't think Trump can draw a crowd, you weren't paying attention during the last election.

Actually, I was, and his crowds (and $hillary's) were nothing compared to Bernie's. That's including all the out-of-work actors Drumpf hired for his events.

Trump is just a distraction, while the R's dismantle/auction off the domestic portion of the country. He'll sign what Pence and Pribus put in front of him. Look at the cabinet app'ts.

Poor fucker believes his own lies.

^ Says the guy who's been wrong about everything for the past several years.

He's right about that last bit, though.

Pretty sure these protests will be going on indefinitely. Outside the house here where they do all the big Democrat fundraising, I spotted a number of large, professionally printed signs that all said, "Constant Assembly." So, I guess that might be the latest liberal protest slogan.

Or Ikea's new slogan.

Does anyone know if Twitter can delete any account at any time at its discretion, or is it beholden to certain standards? It would be a wonderful way to create havoc if they pulled the plug on him now.

That won't happen, I'm sure. But it wouldn't surprise me if Twitter went bankrupt or somehow ceased to exist sometime between now and the next election. The media doesn't know what the fuck to do with itself now that a Republican can somewhat control his own press coverage.

Meanwhile, here's a not-so-professionally printed sign:

What Republican? That orange con man ain't no Republican.

And I guess you don't consider the conservatives' media to be media at all? So... Fox, Breitbart, New Republic, etc are not included as the media? Only CNN, HuffingPaintPost, and MSNBC are the media. Yeah, that's fair and balanced.

Since his twitter account is now the official POTUS account I don't see how Twitter could delete it. Even if they could he would probably drone them in retaliation.

I assume you meant National Review.

oh yeah, that one.

^ You know damn well that people have to seek out conservative news sites whereas the liberal media has almost blanket coverage of the major networks and printed newspapers (with a few exceptions).

^So the gravamen of your complaint, then, is that you're lazy and you want to have your pablum spoonfed to you. Got it.

As you know I'm from the other side, and I see it as exactly the opposite, loudmouth rightwingers everywhere and unavoidable on screen and in print. Maybe it is some kind of perverse syndrome we both have.

No, getting back to my main point which is that I'm glad Trump gets to use Twitter to make direct statements to the public instead of having his message distorted by the mainstream liberal media.

Yeah, clearly we both need to just drink more. Speaking of which, I'm starting a diet and going dry at the end of the week.

That's the very definition of having your pablum spoonfed to you.

You mean the networks and newspapers filled with college graduates and higher degree achievers who believe in things like fact checking and real-reality? Gee, wonder why they don't support the alternate-fact position? Tell us again about the yuge crowds Mr press secretsry.
Fox and Nat'l Review are not things you have to seek out. They are as mainstream as NBC/SNL or Rolling Stone or any other left-wing outfit.
The reason you have to seek out other "news" sources is because they are fringe element and not credible. (BlightFart, AlexJonez, etc)

Yeah, the fake news. Like CNN running a made-up pee pee story.

They never said it was true, but don't let facts obscure your prejudices.

And the pee story came out of McCain's office, that liberal jew-run former nominee for the GOP.

Ouch!

Yep. Same as they reported it when your man went on for eight years about a birth certificate. That wasn't true, either, but their report about your man's antics was.


By the way, how can your insist on releasing a birth certificate and get away with withholding his taxes. If he got a birth certificate, twice, he'd put up his worth certificate.

What about that story CNN ran a couple of days before the Obama inauguration about how if Obama and Biden get assassinated before they take the oath of office then Bush would still be in charge. Oh that's right CNN didn't run that story. They waited until a couple of days before the Trump inauguration to run that story. Give me one reason to believe anything that comes out of that network's piehole?

I never really cared where Obama was born, so I didn't follow the whole birther movement thing. But, I seem to recall that even what Obama did finally release still didn't satisfy the birthers as far as being the original document.

Anyway, a birth certificate is a requirement to become President. Releasing your taxes isn't although it's a long-standing tradition. In case you haven't noticed, Trump doesn't really seem to care about those sorts of things.

And Obama never released his college transcripts, which was also a long-standing tradition and no one in the media seemed to care. That was probably because in between sucking each other's dicks, they didn't want to possibly expose the truth about a President that they had already declared to be the smartest in U.S. history. And who knows if he might've listed himself as being from Africa to ease the admissions process.

Great speech, and Roddenberry and Nimoy were as libtard as it gets. Irony, lost on the uneducated Trumpeters again.

I had to stop watching. I can't stand that ghetto black poet vocal inflection thing that she's trying to do.