Originally Posted By: backdoorman
Bragging about it will get the Fed on your ass every time. Just ask Max and a few others.
I'm not sure I understand the gist though. Is the content extreme or what? Was there actual coercion or just play acting? What's the deal?


The girls contend that they were told that the video would be for private use and printed on DVD in Australia, never to be distributed online. Also, the lawsuit contends they were pressured to have sex off camera. Another part of the lawsuit says another model was not told there would be sex until she arrived in San Diego. That's all fine and dandy, but GDP films each model as they sign all of their release forms. Again I say, if these girls were ever put on a stand by a decent attorney, they would be shredded to pieces. They also contend that their names were released to porn forums by the GDP guys. Porn WikiLeaks had a forum dedicated to the models being outed. I would guess about 80% of the models real names were posted on that forum. That forum was deleted a few days ago the same day the lawsuit became public. Thing about GDP, they hands down produced the best looking amateur first time models in porn, hands down. It's when they began to scour Instagram for models that the quality and frequency of their models went through the roof. They literally spend days on Instagram soliciting females.