Quote:

PCR detection is shit. There are 30 to 100 false positives for every 4 true positives. It costs to much and would create to many false positive hassles. Nothings perfect, least of all PCR.


PCR might not be very "specific" - there may be false positives - but as long as it is "sensitive" - very few false negatives - that's OK. The goal, after all, is to quickly clear talent to work. A few false positives don't prevent that as long as there aren't false negatives.

Isn't AIM testing already PCR?
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock