> = greater than

Did you even go to high school (in a black trench coat)?

No, that would be your argument. My argument is that when it's done back at you, you crumple up in a ball and cry like a bitch. As you've been doing all day.

fixed

All year

Fixed. And true.

I suppose 22 indictments in a year counts as winning, if your goal is to out-nixon Nixon.

^ And still NO evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, which was the whole reason for Mueller to be appointed in the first place.

Why do your responses refer to things I never said? I asked J.B. why it's ok to attack her looks right after he posted an unflattering pic of her. I never once mentioned the WHCD.

You mean, apart from the crimes Giuliani has already publicly conceded?

^ Just because something winds up in an unfunny SNL opening skit doesn't make it true.

You referred to "You Guys". Plural. And you're still dodging Drumpf's documented history of doing exactly the same thing.

I'm worried that the warmer weather and the attendant shedding of the Alaskan winter layer has weakened Steezo's ability to roll up into a protective ball. You need to eat, boy.

I'm referring to Giuliani's own appearances on Hannity and the other Fox News programs. Of course, just because something winds up on Fox News doesn't make it true, either.

This is still the funniest lie all day. So, your 1970s/1980s upbringing had more access to guns than any other? 1870s, 1770s, 1900s? Talk about bullshit! No one is coming for yer gunz! That's just the NRA feeding you a bunch of fear to swallow.

^ Everyone in Alaska has guns. They're everywhere. And back then no one secured them. Please try harder to follow along.

Condescension at last, See you can learn from the educated. Still say "more than ever" ? More than the 1870s Alaskans?

^ What am I, a fucking time traveler? Not every point has to be attacked on every level. We had easy access a lot of fucking guns and no one ever shot up the school, ok?

Next you'll prolly tell me it's not ok to beat up the Irish.

Why do we know the name Charles Whitman? Start there

^ I do not know that name.

Those who chose not to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/02/las-vegas-shooting-university-of-texas-tower

In 1966, there were relatively few assault weapons on the market that were convertible to full automatic, and far less awareness of how to do so. Now the instructions for converting a weapon are freely available on the internet, along with kits costing just a few hundred dollars that either help with the modifications or essentially act as crude conversion mechanisms in and of themselves.
There weren't as many AK-47s around in 1966 as there are now, and only a few AR-15s that could be converted, because it was a relatively new weapon...

Well you said we know the name. But if I want to know who he is, I have to fucking look it up. Ridiculous.

And my brother converted an Uzi to full auto. Until it broke forever, do you know the only thing he ever used it for? To cut down a tree.

More people have been killed at schools this year than have been killed while serving in the military. Look it up

^Prolly because Donald Trump did more to eliminate the threat to our military from ISIS in one year than Obama did in eight.

A perfect Kelly Anne. Swerve, and pivot. Swerve, and pivot.

actually up under 45

^No. It's called, "Point-Counterpoint!" And I have it down a science now. Also, you keep mentioning things that have nothing to do with my arguments. I never said we don't have a problem with school shootings. I just don't think gun control is the answer.

First you mention school shootings vs military deaths this year, then you link to an article from last November. Your arguments have stopped making sense entirely.

the two are not mutually exclusive. Both are true. Hard for your bifurcated mind, I know.

^ Ok, and what if military deaths were up last year and down dramatically this year? I'm not going to bother searching for articles to back this up. I'm just saying your arguments don't make any sense anymore.

well, this is close to a black trench coat.....

^ How dare you mock my heritage. Have you no shame, sir?

This is clearly a case for Hookers in the Schools programs to begin right away. Fuck guns in the classrooms, get some fucking whores up in there to suck off these maladjusted loner losers and Boom, there goes school shootings. Thing of the past.(pun intended)
Poor neighborhoods can make the school nurse do it. Fuck her, the drunk

No one cares Zorba.

Yeah, high school girls these days are way hotter than they used to be, but their sluttiness hasn't increased at the same rate and it's driving these young guys nuts. Also, trench coats.

Not that it matters. We don't need gun control or enhanced school security or hookers or anything else. Apparently, the problem is taking care of itself: https://mises.org/wire/there-are-fewer-school-shootings-now-during-1990s

Yup, I read the Leftist version of this same story recently.

https://www.npr.org/2018/03/15/593831564...ols-and-reality

What seems spurious is that it doesn't specify school shooters and the causes of the 90s deaths. Only that they were killings at school, which ignores the crack factor. A bunch of low number incidents vs the mass murderer style

This merely indicates the current overcrowding in our public schools, the result of gross mismanagement by the incompetent liberal Democrats who have a stranglehold over our education system. If you want your kids to have a safe school life, you should send them to less crowded, properly managed Christian schools run by compassionate, conservative Republicans.

Well, someone obviously didn't go to catholic school.

Yeah and when those kids grow up and take over the first people that would get thrown in the fucking gulag would be sex perverts like you and me both you fucking fool. Your stupid gimmick is getting real old real fast.

Do us all a favor and make that your own new sig talking about yourself.