I'll take this to be an "Ask Rear Admiral Inappropriate Questions" thread.

Admiral, you have traveled the world and tasted many delicacies. Which land is home to the tastiest anuses? Both whites and non whites.

Is there a land where anal sex is easier to come by? How about near impossible?

Thank you.

Can't say I know much about the culture... other than a soda is "Eighty-Fi' Cent! You pay or go!"

Is it good or bad?

Since you ask, the tastiest Asian pussies and anuses are in Korea. Koreans are very clean and therefore their equipment is really sweet-tasting.

In Southeast Asia, where it's sweaty all day, women's skin exudes the essence of what they've been eating, so in the case of Thai and Vietnamese women, who eat some very spicy things, there can be a tang to their skin when one is sucking on tits, pussy, and ass. Even after the obligatory shower. But there are reasons not to do that in Southeast Asia anyway, because it seems there are varieties of the clap which are now impossible to treat. I don't want that in my throat, so in Southeast Asia we keep it above the waist mostly.

The best white women in the world are found in the Freikorpur Kultur clubs (nudist clubs; FKKs) of Germany. Those places are off the hook and highly recommendable. Usually the women come from Romania, Poland, Ukraine and Russia. Oddly enough, I have never been to Greece as an adult. I presume, however, that Greece and Turkey are awesome. In a business meeting today I met a tall, shapely, and fit Turkish woman and she was quite breathtaking.

Anal sex is easiest to come by in Japan, I'd reckon. It's a standard service there owing to a wrinkle in the legal definition of "intercourse" which does not include blowjobs, and does not include anal intercourse. There are places one can go where the service girls are not prostitutes in their self-concept, and not according to law, but nonetheless one can fuck them in the ass. Japan is a weird place. Where anal sex is impossible? Korea. The Admiral generally finds a butt fuck to be a hard sell anyway, due to size, but in Korea it's a complete no-go.

China is generally bad value. Bad breath (tea and cigarettes), poor service, and high price weirdly enough. At least in Beijing and Shanghai. South China (Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Zhuhai, and I would presume Hainan Island) is a lot of fun, but then we're back to sweaty.

Hong Kong offers great variety, reasonable prices if you're accustomed to developed-world costs, and it's easy to score cocaine there. Party, party, party.

Great response. Thank you.

I can verify your comments about Korea. Never encountered a stinky pussy there, but anal is absolutely impossible. I tried for a full year and got nothing but horrified responses when I suggested it. I'm shocked to hear that anal is easily obtained in Japan.

Do you have any experiences in the sex clubs of Prague? I've heard some good things about them and know that Daniela Rush got her start in the sex biz in Prague clubs.

I agree about the FKKs. I did several visits to those.

well i know what i'm watching later.

M*A*S*H?

ha!
complete and total lack of degradation on that show. sure they made their own booze and some nurse-whores took some dick but after the admirals revelation i am some disappoint.

and that show was somewhere near the same time frame of archie bunker, right?.

Pretty close. I was < 1 year, but 1971 must have been a good year for the boobtube: those + Sanford & Son, Hawaii 5-0, Fat Albert, Bob Nehart, Kung Fu, Ironside, Mission Impossible, Green Acres, Hogan's Heroes, and of course the Beverly Motherfuckin' Hillbillies.

Amazing Col. Klink won 2 Emmy's for Hogan's Heroes and today it would never make it on air.

________________________________________________________________


Admiral, if I can pick your brain some more, which Asians are most likely to partake in drugs with you? Is there a group who never does? Is there a group who you don't dare bring it up to?

How about Euros?

^ I'd be willing to bet Koreans don't.

Yeah, the Korean guy who used to run the deli down the street was real religious and didn't do shit.

"You don't drink, gamble, smoke, curse or do drugs? What do you do for fun?"

"Take you money."

"As long as you keep feeding me pork roll, egg and cheese, you can keep taking my money."

1) What's a start-up?
2) What's an equity?

Dear Rear Admiral. Please explain exactly what you meant by "and saw the bones of american's who died there dug up" Are you trying to suggest the lives of American's are some how intrinsically worth more than those of any other place on the planet? Seeing as you're so international wouldn't you say nationalism is a backwards cancer that infects the minds of regressive idiots?

No, I would say that the conceit of "transnationalism" is the cancer that infects the brains of progressive idiots and smug fools. I'm American by grace of God, and am constantly reminded of that fact through my decades of expatriation.

As for the bones of fallen American fighting men, those are the men who paid the check so you could be free to be an asshole, ironically waving the flag of one of history's most monstrous states. To have had the privilege of helping to return a few of them home to their families is the great honor of my life.

So in other words you're a complete and total fucking moron. Every other solider that's fallen in the name of their flag feel's the exact same way about their nation state, it's the same fucking brainwashing, the only difference is the scope of either the imperialism or the theocracy. "american by the grace of god"??? what the fuck does that mean? The cunt that shat you into the world smelt more golden because it was in the lower 48, sounds like monarch type shit to me, do you believe in monarchy? Once again fuck you.

Go have a cookie, William Hyde.

Of course American lives are worth more. That is why Captain America will play in theaters all over the world, and we Americans don't give a fuck to see any of their movies.

American lives are much more valuable by any standard.

It's (relative) location, location, location:
1 local boy= 10 boys from the next town over = 100 boys outside your state = 1000 boys from a distant land.
In translation - one teen shot dead at the local mall = 230+ Asians lost over the Indian ocean.

the word is "potential". being born white american male is the lottery ticket of the universe. cgp knows this and i get his point on a philosophical level but philosophy doesn't work in the animal kingdom.

if you don't think white american males aren't the apex predators at this certain point in time then you need to kick the shit you're on and check yourself.

The Admiral knows; I'll stand with him.

I'm sure folks that get killed, beaten, raped, robbed, whatever daily by the many roving packs of Nigroes doing what Nigroes do might disagree.

The Danes have it good. Very few roving bands of negroes to contend with. Just the Germans across the border. Got to keep an eye on those motherfuckers.

Unless you're a Danish Cartoonist. Then you get Fatwatized By Fanatics. Or Childish Gobshite Posters.

Everyone has such compelling logical arguments.

C'mon, admit it: You drew the scope over Bobby Jindal because you didn't think anyone would get the laser point.

Have they removed the fatwa on him? He and Salman Rushdie should share an apartment in NYC.

I remember reading that after the Rushdie fatwa was proclaimed, a bunch of fatwa-inspired films appeared in Pakiville and the Middle East: Islamic commandos going off to hunt down Rushdie and chop his head off. They sure loved their fatwa.

Re the avatar with Piyush there, I thought those were horns.

Yes, but other than the visit to Big Sister, I don't remember any of the names. The women were by and large absolutely beautiful.

We're probably just waiting for you to school us with a seemingly endless post of Chomsky vids. And maybe some of the shitty tunes you think impress everyone.

No N.igger but here's a graph showing the income gap explode in almost direct correlation to Buckley Vs Valeo

So. you're bummed your mom won't pay you more for doing the laundry and shaving her callouses even tho she just got a raise down to the casino?

I've heard casino's dealers make pretty shitty pay considering the stress of the job. How about instead of bitching about posts of chomsky videos you make some kind of coherent argument against anything he has to say. You are getting more and more worthless, you used to at least make halfway thought out arguments, now you do nothing but make stupid snarky remarks. Very niggerish behavior.

Stress? Pfft. Most are union and then you have to consider the tips they get. No sympathy.

So, in other words, who cares about Chomsky, but make sure you read Chomsky--or watch my videos--so you can refute him.

Way to contradict yourself, Fat Bloody Faggot.

Why would I listen to Chomsky bore on about politics? His field is linguistics.

Refuting Chomsky is like refuting FBF. He throws a firecracker that he doesn't actually believe, just for attention, then expects to be taken seriously. Not in my America.

I think you may be thinking of Ann Coulter...??

Chomsky may be a little naive with his rants about the Elites and projecting American hegemony abroad and blah blah blah, but "Manufacturing Consent" is still an eye-opener when you're a student. And to date, he's the only person I've seen put William F Buckley on the ropes. I'm a fan.

Here's a video of Chomsky being extremely "naive" about the way things work



Post anything at all to convince me William F Buckley wasn't a total fucking idiot.

The last thing I'll EVER do [ second perhaps to an anal scene with Mr Marcus ], is defend William F Buckley. But I do think Chomsky was a little naive in his representation of the working class as mere innocent dupes to the military-industrial complex, and the mainstream press as its propaganda machine.
Chomsky does draw a fairly accurate picture of the global power structure. But ultimately, this structure doesn't emerge out of some calculated conspiracy, hatched behind closed doors... but out of the natural market forces of supply and demand, and cost v benefit. Ultimately, the balance of power will always rest with the masses. And if the "power" that our leaders have is ultimately contigent on the complacency of the masses, then to what degree can we claim that they're manipulating us, and not the reverse?

Cliff Robertson nailed it.

You sound like a gigantic apologist for the right, and are contributing to the false 'conservative/liberal' paradigm we have. ......if you're actively denying the absolute force of organized money and dismissing it as "conspiratorial" then I think it is you my friend who is naive. ....If you happen to be a female who has done some anal scenes please feel free to post photographic evidence.

Keep trying Sally.

Eat cold shit in a hot hell you worthless fucking N gger

I could only be an apologist if I thought there was something to apologize for. And I am absolutely not denying the influence of money, nor am I dismissing anything as a conspiracy. I was dismissing those who themselves claim to see conspiracy. Yes, there is a military-industrial complex... yes, there are multi-national corporations which wield more power and influence than any democratically elected politician. Those facts are plainly obvious to anyone who's bothering to pay attention.

But my point is this:
As long as I live in this country...

and not this country...
Why should I care??

Of course you shouldn't care traveler. It would make you more human and less of a nationalist.

Shouldn't you be occupying Wall Street or something?

You're not very good at this, first you try to make some argument about Chomsky's naive understanding of the world then you backpedal every point you made and actually appeared to agree with everything but then say your argument is just "well, I don't care because I live in 'merica".....Even if we're looking at things through a conservatarian view point, say, such as Ron Paul's, wouldn't you agree we at least SHOULD care on some level as our never ending genocidal foreign policy will lead to a never ending stream of people willing to smash more airplanes into our buildings?

Has anyone noticed that the set of folks decrying the primacy of money intersects quite strongly with the set of folks who can't seem to figure out a way to get any money? Of course, the opinion leaders of the losers bitching about the primacy of money, they know how to make money — by rousing that rabble, of course. An hour of Chomsky's time to yammer on at the local U to tell future Starbucks baristas about how the rich are screwing them? That'll be twelve thousand smackers, fuck you very much. (At least, that was his rate in 2006 when we still had the illusion of a strong dollar.)

You'd think such an important anti-capitalist message as Chomsky's should be delivered free of charge, wouldn't you? But no, Chomsky values his labor many dozens of times higher than my labor, while denouncing me as an exploiter, and hundreds if not a thousand times higher than the labor of the rabble he rouses.

Did you know that most of Chomsky's (and his wife's, as she is a professor at Harvard) academic work has been funded by the Pentagon? That's right: Chomsky works for the war machine. Chomsky grew rich working for the war machine. He owns not just one home in a wealthy enclave, but also a vacation home in an even more wealthy enclave. What do you suppose Harvard and MIT professors get paid? Why does he not teach at a community college where he can help more of the oppressed?

Did you know that Chomsky has moved most of his millions into irrevocable trusts, to keep the assets away from the tax man. But, but, isn't Noam Chomsky one of the leading voices demanding a more progressive system of taxation? Didn't he say that April 15 ought to be a day of celebration where citizens rejoice over doing their part for the commonweal?

What a fucking phony. Always it is thus with the vanguard of the proletariat.

Actually, I did know chomsky worked for MIT which was primarily funded by the pentagon, it's right in the above video you stupid asshole. and he talks about his wife doing research for he pentagon as well in another video. You're a little lose with the facts on that one as it was pretty common practice for universities being required to claim a technological or scientific research project had some kind of military application even it was completely bogus, a lot of their funding required that. Interesting as you seem to completely miss the irony that the pentagon is virtual socialism funding almost all the technological advancements we have had which eventually ended up in the free market, amazing what you can do with unlimited tax payers r&r when you don't have to worry about the market, I thought that was called EVIL SOCIALISM. As far as chomsky's going rate for lectures, you could have even made him look even worse if you pointed out the claim (one I've seen leveled on right wing blogs, might be true, might be bullshit) about him more than doubling his asking rates after 911. Feel free to call the man a hypocrite.

You see you're engaging in what is known as genetic fallacy, and it's not a way to make logical refutations of arguments. I can make some more for you if you like. Marx lived off his wealthy relatives. He fucked his maid and got her pregnant. He would get drunk and try to knock the hats off of british bobbies. with snow balls (even you have to admit that's pretty cool) and he called Lasalle a Jewish N igger or some such thing........If we're going to play this game it's no different than bringing up the fact Thomas jefferson called the indians mercillis savages or fucked his slaves or the founding fathers really didn't give a shit about the average man every time some dumb shit hick or talk radio idiot wants to start opining with almost religious reverence about the founding fathers..or that Ayn rand was a chain smoking tweeker who idolized a child murderer and suckled on the tit of socialist american medicare on her last days.........not to mention an extremely shitty writer.

We shouldn't even really having these arguments. After all we're Americans by the grace of God and we should stand united.

No, I said the Pentagon funded Chomsky's research. It isn't as simple as Chomsky being on the faculty at MIT, and MIT incidentally accepting Pentagon-linked educational subsidies. The Pentagon funded Chomsky's research. As in, his earliest books were funded by DOD grants, and his work on linguistics in a Pentagon-funded special research lab at MIT directly informed the syntax of computer languages used for command-and-control systems.

I believe we're splitting hairs at this point. He states in the above video that MIT at that point was virtually %100 funded by the pentagon. I love how you completely gloss over the part where he talks about the anti war activities going on at MIT at the time as well and mentions facing jail time (I haven't researched the validity of the severity of his possible sentencing. Seeing as you're such a learned man of the world, why don't you do it for me) ....You also completely gloss over the broader points I was making, Seeing as you're obviously so much more intelligent than me. Why don't you try making some valid arguments on the virtues of the "free market" system, and provide plenty of data and sources.


http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/genetic-fallacy.html

Put some effort into it Sally.

I have a feeling that, somehow, Monsanto is to blame for all of this.

Monsanto doesn't sound Jewish, but they are a tricky people so I wouldn't put it past em to use a Fugazi name. Rosenblatt would be too much of a tell.

That's what "they" want you to believe. Monsanto, as all right thinking hot plate enthusiasts know is nothing more than a cover for those who Really Run the Show.

I thought the Arch Enemy were DuPont, the makers of such fine goods as napalm and breast implants that leak.

Then again, Monsanto won't be satisfied 'til it owns the trademark on every seed sold in the US.

A subsidiary of the Thorn Corporation. A division of Howell Enterprises.

Fuck Chomsky. You just quote Chomsky because you are too goddamn lazy to read the New York Times EVERY day, front to back, and form your own goddamn opinions.

is this still a serious thread?.
- or -
is this seriously still a thread?.

I feel the only factual posts in the thread are the ones where Rear Admiral discusses whores.

I guess this is as good of place as any to point out that Chomsky was a gigantic apologist for the Khmer Rouge.

Ain't no Jews in the agri-business. 'cept for the bankers and distributers and stuff, but not the bosses.

...stupid

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2779086.html

I'll post a link to everyone's favorite youtuber, considering some dumb fucking asshole above me chose to flap his cocksucker about pol pot

I have trouble taking seriously a grown man who doesn't own a suit.

I think he's more along the lines of not owning shoes with laces.

Suits are for scammers.

God, I have finally watched one of the Jason Unruhe videos. Incredibly stupid.

hahaha, sure.