Quote:

I doubt they have a case as they will clearly say she knew the risks of being in the business and doing crazy stints like double anal.




When did she do porn before? I thought she was just a stripper.

Remember that AVN article where Sharon Mitchell said she'd "eradicated" HIV? That was about six months or less before the outbreak, if I remember correctly. This is the testing control authority claiming that there was no HIV in the business, or at least the reader would infer that. Not only was Lara Roxx infected on a set, she was most likely (at least by the claims of the same testing control authority) infected by a veteran performer.


Quote:

Most jurors would be appalled by this situation as well. It is doubtful she would get sympathy as she came all the way from canada to work. And don't they sign waivers and shit like before each scene? For example t.t. boy's release to any liability? For for extra incentive, t.t. should so this bitches nasty ass crotch area to show she was careless in her actions with others.




Liability waivers are dodgy at best. I can't have you sign a liability waiver that says you hold me blameless if I shoot you while doing my William Tell routine.

Just try assassinating her character. Hooker? Okay. Stripper? Most definitely. Want to Google "TT Boy" and see what you come up with? It's about him abusing, choking, and hurting performers. I see lots and lots of paragraphs containing the phrase "callous disregard." One sees how that works.

This isn't a rape case. Her behavior immediately before and after won't matter at all. She was negative before, and has HIV now. That's it. I'd love this case if I were her attorney, though I'd be a bit skittish about him skipping town and setting up shop overseas. He probably has enough property around to make it worthwhile, and anything he transfers into trust or to relatives or partners after the date the suit was filed will be taken for fraud or evasion.
_________________________