Quote:

there's no way a jury is going to give an aids-infected, porn-actress/hooker from another country ten million dollars,
.
in a criminal suit, say if she was raped, people would side with her--money's a different thing.


Individuals can't file criminal cases. Her case will be civil, with much lower standards. And juries can be a real wildcard. May they won't and maybe they will. That's a risk T.T. probably shouldn't take.

Were there just one HIV+ that would be one thing, but there is a cluster of three, all centered on Evasive shoots involving Darren.

Were I a juror I'd want to see a virus type analysis to show that all three were likely related infections but that's about all I'd need to say her infection was more likely from the Evasive shoot than not. There is no "beyond a reasonable doubt" in civil cases.

Her lawyer is after a quick buck. T.T. ought to look at the risks of going to trial and try for a settlement that gets money in her lawyer's pocket quickly.

Unless he truly believes that she didn't get infected on his set, and he believes he can find some evidence to back that up, he ought to settle. He's not in a good position to win and he won't look good to a jury (neither will Lara, but that's not enough to compensate).
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock