Article seems like typical mainstream hipster reporting on porn: clueless, pseudo-cynical yet hypocritically moralistic bullshit; "porn oscars" (too hip to even bother getting the facts right); the supposed genius running a mediocre internet porn company built on pirating competitors (what exactly makes him more 'outrageous than anyone else'?).

The writer tries desperately to tie everything into his little shitty narrative and claims that Stagliano's POV gonzo act which actually dates from the late 80s is somehow a reaction to Manwin? And the typical claim that in recent years porn has amped up the aggression to compete with the net, when the opposite is true. He even tries to suggest that camming is something new and highly profitable? WTF?