I don't disagree with what that reviewer posted said, but I disagree with their conclusion that it was necessary to cover it all in this documentary. Why should they? The Stones made a difference in the 60's, 70's and early 80's. They covered that. Since then they've been a business that's produced a few good products. But the products they produced early were earth shattering.

I'm sorry, but these motherfucking heathens went right to the ledge, then pulled themselves back just enough to survive and thrive. The same can't be said for any of the other bands.