Turns out he's been balling his biographer, Paula Broadwell, whose book is laughably titled All In (guess the publisher didn't spring for her first suggestion, Balls Deep?). They say she's under investigation for accessing his emails. Something doesn't add up in a Hookergate sort of way here, but let's all dissect her appearance anyway!

Been a while since some honcho's hooker hijinx brought Pinupmtant this way.

Hadn't heard the e-mail part. Who's saying it?

Come on. Guy is a fucking General. It is a time of war still right? Dude should be able to fuck whoever he can, as a thank you for his service to the country.

Emails would be the other shoe to drop makes sense. Everyone tries to spin it that McGreevey resigned from NJ Gov because he is gay. Nope. He resigned because he got caught trying to shoe horn his foreign born boy toy into NJ's Homeland Security position.

Therefore I can see this dude let her see some emails and it costing him his job. They probably want to keep that part off the record, so no one pries into what the emails said.

Paula Broadwell? I'd totally fuck her.

I don't know how McGreevey trying to get his twink hired means the General's Ho gets a daily briefing.

I think a more likely scenario is that someone in the Pentagon has lingering issues over this mess and wants to know why some Generals get called on shit and others don't.

My thought is that he isn't resigning over the affair, he is resigning over the email leak and the affair was made public so he would go away, rather than they court martial him for letting her read "sensitive" emails.

The other guy is nuts. Petraeus was just horny.

Read about the Waffle House exec that is being sued for hiring a single mom that needed a job, and seemingly, allegedly brow beat her and threatened her job until she would wack him off. If you gonna risk a high paying gig, get something better than hand jobs. http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/justice/georgia-waffle-house-allegation/.

It's funny how this happened just days before he was supposed to testify before Congress on the Benghazi fiasco. There have been indications over the past couple of weeks that Petraeus wasn't going to toe the party line.

I suspect Obama has known about this affair for a while and kept it in his back pocket until he needed a little leverage against Petraeus.

Obama is desperate to keep this Benghazi mess under wraps, just as he was desperate enough to keep Fast & Furious under wraps. When Congress demanded that he provide document related to Mexican gun running, Obama invoked executive privilege and essentially told Congress to go fuck itself.

So much for the most transparent administration in U.S. history. The Magic Negro is the most corrupt president since Nixon.

^^^While Congress can subpoena him later he will not be testifying this Thursday, and that buys the administration some time. Also he will no longer be able to provide or have access to any documents. Let's just hope he doesn't go taking any long walks in a federal park.

Karl, Karl, Karl: Desperation only occurs when you're losing. Like, by a margin of 332-206.




Ah, I hadn't read anything about the e-mails until this morning. But having read it, I also read that rumors of this have been around for years.

Petraeus has been the fair-haired golden boy since West Point, where he married the Superintendent's Daughter. Architect of "The Surge." Got the top commands. Got all the press. Seems to have gotten all the broads as well. You don't think some disgruntled one-or-two-star general would drop a dime to the FBI?

Petraeus wasn't just horny, he was hella hubristic. And, for once in his life, flat-out dumb.

That electoral margin don't mean shit J.B. You ever see the county map of the U.S. that Romney won. Minorities in the big cities and women won this election for Odumbass.

This whole resignation is way too coincidental to the Benghazi bungle to be just an affair. Hillary's gone too right ? Not to mention Eric Shithead Holder.

On the contrary, it's the only thing that matters. (And, by a 5-4 margin.)


BTW, He won the popular vote, as well.

Didn't say it didn't matter. Just not an indication of a rout by any stretch.

You're correct. Karl Rove's meldown of Fox is a far better indication of a rout.





And speaking of hubris in high places. . .

Landslide by Fox standards!

Nixon's 1972 win was even bigger. How did his second term work out? I can't remember.

That's the second Nixon analogy you've made, Karl. Are you suggesting Obama won because of voter fraud?


Nah, I didn't think you wanted to go there. While we're at it. . .



There's those pesky Fifteenth and Nineteenth Amendments again. Look, it's obvious you guys don't like the nigras, and it's a reasonable inference you guys don't like women, either. Be that as it may, it takes a special sort of cluelessness to antagonize two voting blocks who might not otherwise be allied into voting against you.

You want to know why Mitt Romney lost on Tuesday? It's because he was as out of touch with the electorate, on the right, as Al Gore was on the left twelve years ago. Hubris knows no parties. And this vague implication of yours, that Petraeus, Hilary and "the magic negro" killed Vince Foster in order to make Missouri a province of Greater Kenya, is about on level with some of the Dems' grumblings in 2000.

maps
I agree that the repubs need to quit antagonizing minorities and women in general. I'm not a repub by any stretch.

Okay, but land area does not equal popular will. And maybe if we can get some of the ghetto rats enthused with capitalism, we'd have less problems in those precincts, yes?

I'm not wedded to the Dems, either, but this alleged Benghazi conspiracy is desperation in it's purest form.

1) Obama won, fair and square

2) ^ It's entirely Mitt Romney's "fault;"

3) Whining about Petraeus, or Benghazi, looks petty when we have much bigger fish to fry, like the "fiscal cliff" John Boehner's trying to push us over.

You stupid fuck. There is a huge difference between the incumbent getting 332 votes, and the incumbent's challenger getting 332 votes.

BTW, thanks for helping in the destruction of the country. Make sure you feel proud of yourself when your Government hand out check bounces

What do you mean the Government's handing out checks? I thought it'd be like this.

General Pet doesn't strike me as the blackmailable type. He got caught and his own honor code wouldn't let him stay in office.

And I don't see him falling on his sword for the likes of Barack Obama.

Exactly what I've been trying to say. His honor code is the West Point honor code. He stands or falls on that. To his credit, he did what honor required.


There's plenty to hang upon Obama. This isn't one of those things.

He still has to testify about Benghazi or this will tarnish his image. Like people are saying, it is WAY too convenient as far as the timing goes. Who knows, Obama may have dirt on almost everyone involved in his administration and just keeps it stored away for when he needs a conveniently timed resignation.

^^^Aren't you the guy who bungled his ballot by being blotto?

Shit, you're going to talk about his "image" when you make me look sober?

I've had a lot on my fucking mind lately. I was already drinking today during college football, even though I normally hate college football.

I'm quoting this to make certain this is your "official" excuse.

I'm not judging it. I will include it in any discussion on "how Republicans vote."

This is exactly one of those things. The attack went on for seven hours. CIA, State, Defense and AfriCom knew about it almost as soon as it started. They had live drone feeds in well under an hour. Panetta briefed Obama on it about an hour after if began. How could this not be negligence by Obama?

Petraeus made a public admission of infidelity to take blackmail off the table and immediately announced that he won't testify before Congress next week.

Just before the election, Hillary said that she was taking full responsibility for Benghazi. Now that the election is over, she has announced that she is leaving State and also will not testify before Congress because of a scheduling conflict. How does one take responsibility for that massive fuckup and then nonchalantly tell Congress to fuck itself?

Obama is circling the wagons and throwing everyone under the bus. Of course this all comes back on him. He knew that his inaction would result in the death of those four Americans and he just didn't give a fuck.

Heh. CLICKY.

I'm enjoying your denial. The Magic Negro isn't made of Teflon. This Benghazi shit might bring him down. At best, he will come out of hit looking like a shitbag. I don't think Congress is going to let him hide behind executive privilege on this, as he did with Fast & Furious.

Trust me, I'm enjoying yours a whole lot more. It's not 1927 anymore.

lotsa playa hatin' goin on...

Sometimes I like to switch on FOX for giggles. I just don't understand their message. Yesterday I switched over and they where discussing the how the Republican party needs to re-brand itself. Some chick was talking about how they don't need to change their views of "smaller government", just how that particular view is presented. Now, the whole "smaller government" thing is probably the one area where I agree the most with the Repubs. I think a lot of people agree with this sentiment. I don't know about anyone else, but it's the religious and racial bullshit that gets to me. I will never vote on that ticket because of these views. Telling women to accept rape babies? Come the fuck on.

But, Fartz? Isn't accepting Rape Babies one of those traditional American values upon which our society is based?








And not a whole lot of "there" there, either.

Well,now that you mention it .

Ah, yes: The self-styled, self-referential (and self-important) "pundit" press. Still all worked up about Allen West eh?

BTW, who do they cite in that story? Oh, yeah. The Moonies. There's reliable journalism for you.

Stay crazy, kids.

If america can't lose 4 americans, you should really stay home and stop bothering people. Pull out of every country. Stay home. Let China rule the world. They won't sweat 4 people. Or 4000. Or 4000000.

i know what you're saying and i agree. it sucks but those diplomats are in harms way when they take a position in a third world shithole. it's like blaming giuliani for every fireman that died that September day.

Complete bullshit. There is acceptable risk, such as the risk that some radical Islamist assholes will kill you. What is unacceptable is your own government leaving you to die unnecessarily at the hands of those radical Islamist assholes.

Make no mistake about it. We had more than enough assets in the area to defeat the attack and rescue our consulate personnel. There was a conscious decision not to do so. That decision could have made only at the very top.

Here is my question then: Which of the dead would the Executive Branch be happy is dead, and why?

I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest it's one whose demise makes Ol' Blackface here sound less like a raving conspiracy theorist.

Neither Benghazi nor Fast & Furious are Nixonian plots to destroy the Republic. They are, however, the (R)'s favotite smokescreens in obscuring the real issues, like Boehner & McConnel's latest attempt at giving Billionaires another tax cut. The people rejected that idea at the polls. Deal with it.

"The people" didn't endorse or reject anything at the polls. Obama got ~10 million fewer votes than in 2008 and Romney got ~2 million fewer votes than McCain. "The people" are pissed, apathetic, discouraged and disaffected.

Sorry I don't see the comparison between dead Americans and tax cuts as being anywhere near equal. Both Fast and Furious and Benghazi are national disgraces and I don't give a shit who's responsible. The truth needs to come out and people held responsible.
They can tax the rich all they want but it's not going to make any difference in terms of national debt and will make a ton of difference in the economy and jobs for the worse.
The coal mines are laying off left and right around here by the way. Shit for brains policies are creating more and more dependency as we speak. How can any American defend this son of a bitch in office ? They can't see past their own fucking greedy ass noses and don't care who they fuck as long as they get free shit and a govt. dick up their ass.

More denial, Karl? Here's some things the people rejected at the polls:

Smug, Condescending Billionaires:




Rapists:



Dressage:




Seriously, Dressage? Could you pick any more effeminate, elitist "sport" to engage in?

You're right. The people are "pissed, apathetic, discouraged and disaffected." And a majority of them voted for someone who understands their problems just a little bit better than dressage dude does.

They voted for free shit and instant gratification.

You know what's a national disgrace? Holding the country hostage until effete elites get another tax cut to subsidize their pretty ponies.

Neither of these teapot tempests come close to being Nixonian. Boehner and McConnell, however, do seem to be repeating history:

Less a matter of being happy and more a matter of not wanting to anger the Arabs/ Africans. Them not being angry is worth as many American lives as it takes.

But JB says it's nothing, so nothing it must be.

So if you have no problem with them being dead, or as many dead as it takes, what are you bitching about, Barry?

You can't have your dead and your issue, too.

I seen a picture of Petraeus' wife in the paper today. Looks like George Wendt in drag. I change my opinion to "I don't blame the guy."

Context is not your friend, I see. The question, quoted in my post, was from jerk: "Here is my question then: Which of the dead would the Executive Branch be happy is dead, and why?"

I was answering the question for the Administration, which doesn't have a spokesperson here yet. The number of dead Americans is unimportant to the Administration as long as Arab/ African sensibilities are not disturbed.

Try to keep up. It's not that hard.

I think that the government agencies that view this site should pool their resources and provide us a liason.