man a couple of them are fly as shit. WOULD HIT IT.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics...ticle-1.1064287


EDIT: Was it all the same bitch? WOULD STILL HIT IT.

Those are all the same whore from different angles. At least in the still photos; the video isn't loading for me. And I'm not spending $800 on any ho unless Nikki Dial suddenly pops up from nowhere and starts hooking.

I don't see what the big deal is. Secret servicemen have a stressful job. They deserve to relax and get hookers.

It is a big deal when they have copies of the Presidential itinerary lying around the room.

They did? What dumb asses. Everyone knows when you're having hookers over, hide your important documents, hide the pills, etc.

The problem is when the girl was offered 800 and then was offered only 30 . I'd like to know if the guy did the deed and then said he only had 30 . The girl went to the police .

There were lots of other women according to the article on aol .

Whores are silly. A long, long time ago, I bought a table dance from this Russian stripper who decided after the dance that because she was so hot, she could overcharge me. There was a big sign on the wall stating that dances were $20, but she claimed after the dance that she was charging me $40 because of her exceptional hotness.

I only had a $50 and I told her very clearly that she'd be giving me $30 change and I would then hand her the $50. We did the exchange and as I was stuffing my money into my pocket, she punched me in the fucking lip. I donked her on top the the head which give her the jiggly legs and she immediately sat straight down. Security went nuts, the cops were called, the whore was an illegal immigrant and split the scene. I gave my statement to the police who could clearly see I had a bloody lip and, in the end, I wound up with vouchers for free table dances from the managers. Lol.

The whore, btw, looked exactly like Nikita Denise. I've even tried looking up her bio to see if she ever danced in Alaska in the 90's.

whores are legal down there and they had agreed prior.this whore has to put food on the plate for her little whorelets.

I got no prob with those cats getting a little side if they are discreet, but you're a fucking douche to try and lowball her post-pop.

Didn't the Mike in Brazil guy get arrested for underpaying hookers a couple years ago?

Gotta pay her pimp too. I understand he was to get a $250 cut of the $800.

Ever wonder why prostitution is illegal in the first place.

After generations of legal precedent and religious dogma it is now ingrained in our culture that prostitution is bad. But why?

Almost everything else I can think of sort of makes sense why it would be illegal (theft, murder, etc) and even stuff I don't necessarily agree with (smoking pot) you can at least understand the reasons why the law was made--even if you disagree with the reasons or think they are wrong.

What is the original basis for making sex for money illegal?

Why is it legal to get a blowjob for giving a girl a diamond ring, but illegal to get a blowjob for giving her money instead?

Why is it legal for a guy to pay a girl's rent in exchange for sex as long as the money is given to the landlord, but if the money if given to the girl (for her to give to the landlord) it becomes illegal?

There are a lot of reasons SS guys hiring hookers (especially in a less than friendly country) is a bad idea, stressful job or no.

I always come down on the side of the Secret Service, but this bunch fucked up. Plain and simple.

$800 for a hooker in Columbia? What the fuck?

lol i wondered the same thing barry^.and ey nailed it on the head.so people can get in trouble for just giving a woman money for their time but you take them to mcdonalds and a movie and everything after that is fine?

According to the BP whores, and mammy, you're just buying their time, not their orifices. I've often wondered how that defense flies in front of a judge.

Why is it illegal? Because women have the right to vote.

Aren't prostitutes women? Wasn't prostitution made illegal long before women had voting rights?

Wouldn't it have been more accurate, and no less inane, to have said, "Because men have the right to vote?"

No. Most places in the US didn't start to outlaw prostitution until after women got the right to vote.

We, as a society, should revisit the woman's suffrage debate.

It has been frowned on forever because in olden days, pre antibiotics and AIDS, whores were open sewers. Sure today it is all shaved box and STD tests, but in 1412, could you imagine the vile shit growing in the furry cunt of a whore?

Well, I was finally forced to actually do my own search on the internet. I guess I should thank you?

Most federal laws in the U.S. (e.g. Chamberlain-Kahn Act, Mann Act, Development of the Bureau of Investigation to fight "white slavery") occurred before women got the right to vote. Unclear what year the Supreme Court ruled that "consensual debauchery" was subject to the "immoral purposes" rules, but the judges' decision seems to be unrelated to women getting the right to vote and based on laws passed before 1920. Although the protests of what were mostly though of as women's groups (e.g. temperance movements) were felt to be influential, most states in the U.S.A. made prostitution illegal between 1910-1915; a full five years before women got the right to vote.

More to the original point of my question, it appears that the public opinion against prostitution began to shift around the 15th century due to numerous infectious disease outbreaks across Europe and gained steam with the Protestant Reformation in the early 1500's. The spread of Colonialism throughout the 1600's into the 1700's created another vector of new STD outbreaks causing France and the U.K. to pass formal laws against prostitution, not just on a local level, since those already existed, but on a global level (to include any overseas colonies despite local attitudes toward prostitution) in an effort to regulate return of STD's from their colonies in the third world back to the homeland.

For reasons that should be pretty obvious, communist countries have almost always opposed prostitution for reasons unrelated to moral, religious, or infectious disease concerns.

In almost all of South America, prostitution is legal.

Thank you.

P.S. Mississippi finally ratified women's right to vote in 1984.

From what I've read on histories on organized crime in the US it sounds like prostitution was 'illegal' but allowed on a massive scale (by the cops and politicians on the take) via brothels right up till sometime in the 50s or 60s. Ontario's court recently ruled that brothels should be legal btw.

The WCTU was a big player in getting prohibition passed in 1919 which was a year before women could vote. So if they and other groups like them had that influence before they could vote, you could argue that they were also influential in the prohibition of prostitution, even without the actual ability to vote it away.

What's instructive about the Colombia misadventure, especially when taken together with the GSA conference, is that President Awesome insists there is virtually nothing that could be cut from government spending. In February 2012, with much self-congratulation, the President offered up $24 billion in cuts in 2013, for a total of $520 billion over 10 years.

The President has asked for $3.8 trillion dollars in 2013. Against that spending, what's the impact of President Awesome's proposed budget slashing? $24 billion is about six-tenths of one percent of total spending in 2013.

How does $520 billion over ten years stack up? Assuming the budget remains static (i.e., no increases in annual spending at all, which seems unlikely given that our debt burden increases mercilessly), the Federal government will spend $38 trillion over that period. We're doing better: 1.3% reduction in spending.

Say, guy, what portion of the Federal budget is accounted for by borrowed money? Oh, only about 40%. With President Awesome's savage spending cuts, we'll only have to borrow 39% of total spending.

The coke-and-whores party in Colombia, and the hot tub extravaganza in Las Vegas, were paid for with your money, and your grandchildren's money, money extracted by an increasingly voracious government under penalty of imprisonment. When they say they can't cut anything (other than your national defense and closing Yellowstone), and have to raise your taxes, remember how cavalier they are with your money.

Dude, don't worry about that silly debt stuff. The answer is simple: inflation. What do you think QEI, QE2, Operation Twist, the stimulus bill and policies designed to raise energy prices are designed to do? Inflating your way out of debt is a tried and true economic policy. Just look at what it did for the Weimar Republic. Sure, there were some nasty side effects, but all of that WWI reparations debt was paid off on schedule. So what if it took a wheelbarrow full of Deutsch Marks to buy a freaking loaf of bread?

Yup. It is like a family of four going broke to the tune of $100k a year thinking they can dig themselves out of that hole by not buying a "wii " for Christmas...

those last couple posts were some dennis miller/bill maher stuff making go like this:

In an entitlement society, where so many people are dependent on one or more government cheques, the easiest way to scare the fuck out of them is to say any budget cuts will be coming out of these dependent folk's pocket.

I have to question why, if politicians are the ones who got us into this mess, why we have to pay to fix it. If any corporation ran the way the American does, everyone from the CEO on down would dragged into court. And if not that, be trashed by the media and dirty hippie Occupy types. But for whatever reason we turn a blind to our criminal "leaders".

I had this neat, revolutionary idea to save the country where we put some directive in place where every couple of years the people get to nominate 1 person from each house of congress to publicly execute. No lobbying. No corporate influence. Just a flat out majority-rules vote from the population. If these guys where voting with their lives instead of their wallets, I bet they would actually think about the country and the constituents before they cast their bullshit votes that end up benefiting THEM financially. Perfect world and all that.

A sort of Glutton Games.

Something I just thought of, these Secret Service guys that are getting canned, they are probably still going to get their pensions, huh? From what I understand, lot of these guys they hold the pensions over their heads so they keep their yaps shut, and don't do tell alls and what not. Yes/No?

Well one dipshit is already suing the government and (I think it's the same guy), putting up images of himself with hot ho's from previous encounters and leering at Sarah Palin's ass.

I don't remember where I heard it, but some talking head was saying a lot of the career SS guys went over to Homeland Security because the pay was better. Now there's a lot of unseasoned people in SS.

My dislike of the current POTUS notwithstanding, I'd hate to see the SS lose a "client". Any client. I take security of politicians very seriously. Mostly because of my naive belief that we're "better" than countries whose transitions of power involve a tad more bloodshed. Like anywhere in Africa.

He was VERY pissed the first year he had to guard Jessie Jackson. That was his last election, as he could choose to take the assignments or turn them down.

A friend was talking to a retired SS agent who thinks what happened recently is a sign of serious decline. Back in the day they never paid for pussy -and all they had to do was flash their badge.

If I had been on Jesse Jackson's SS detail, I might have spent most of my time looking the other way.

Sign of the economy too. The host should be paying for those hookers. You think Kennedy's ss men had to pay for their own hookers? Fuck no!
Where's that booster/lobbyist dude, put it on his card!

And look how well that worked out for Bobby and Johnny.