I have since been advised by an aquaintance studying law that such an endeavor would be illegal harrassment at best, mean at least, and in a wider/graver context called into question the stability of the humanity of such a mind that could conceive of it at worst. In calm defensiveness I explained to him that it was in some ways a logical conclusion and a reaping of what's been sewn by all concerned, capitalist-product-consumer. He immediately called bullshit and invoked the Golden Rule. Of course he has a point. I no longer endorse the above in any way, shape, or form. It's plain wrong and "logical conlusions" are just a way of justifying such beastly notions.
_________________________
"you aint felt fear till you felt a sista question you on things you dont wanna be questioned on."---GUAPO