Quote:


I have to say that for all the hijinks aimed at the Palin family, the dragging of the little kid into was by far the lamest and most tasteless.


Don't rewrite history please. Palin dragged the kid into, displaying it and talking about at the Republican convention. After she used it as a political prop, the said prop became fair game.

As for good/bad for porn, here is a very simple cheat sheet since so many of you still don't seem to get it:
Democratic presidents -- good for porn; Republican presidents -- bad for porn.

The reason is very simple: Republicans can't get elected without the evangelical anti-abortion, anti-porn crowd. They can't ever deliver on the banning abortion pledge (and would be committing political suicide if they somehow did), so every time they are in power, the crumbs they throw at the evangelicals involve starting a bunch of porn prosecutions.

Meanwhile a core Democratic constituency is the free speech absolutist, pro-ACLU left. And while the Ds can't deliver on real stuff like pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan, closing Gitmo or putting the banksters behind the financial crisis in jail, they don't start any new porn prosecutions. Clear now?
_________________________
"Is the snake OK?"