Now I read the following on generossextreme.com (my comments follow it)

Doneitallnowwhat writes: Do you think it is right for companies, like New Sensations, to hide the fact from their female talent that they will be working with a man who likes to fuck men? As people we have the right to know our sexual partners backgrounds -- regardless if it is work or personal. How many people do you think would be upset if I, as female talent, did a barnyard gangbang on Monday, tested Tuesday, and then went to a boy/girl shoot on Thursday with my negative test. Would I have the right to keep that private? I don't think so.

And if you aren't ashamed of what you have done, then what is the big deal about letting people make an informed decision as to whether they want to work with you?

And lets throw away the excuse these guys use, that they are "gay for pay". Both Biggz/Bam and Byron Long, who have both enjoyed the company of men on video have nothing. If they are lucky they will have some weed in their pocket as they call around for a ride. Obviously, it wasn't for the money.

Back to my comments... I don't understand why people can sit there and complain about this when they totally leave out whatever the person had been doing OFF CAMERA. They could have been sharing needles with transexual prostitutes and then having sex with them on their own time, but its as if it didn't happen if there wasn't a camera. Of course, I know that without it being filmed you wouldn't know if they did any such thing so you can only complain about the filmed & known stuff. I guess I just think that the people who complain about this miss the big picture. Its not just what the person did on film before they were tested but what they did at home too.

Dude, don´t try to understand the mind of a pornster.