Reminds me a bit of Cheney/Bush intentionally trying to confuse the attack on the world trade center and the pentagon as a reason for attacking Saddam Husein. People who are mindless followers will blindly believe her shit makes perfect sense and anybody with a brain and room temperature IQ or above will see through her bullshit.

Would it matter to her argument it was her pre-existing mental defects that led her to go into porn rather than being caused by porn?

Do you think she was intentionally implying that prostitution is the same as being involved in the pornography industry?

Would she feel insulted if she was told that "pre-cancerous" is not synonymous with "early cancer"?

Would she argue with somebody who questioned her implication that abortions are caused by once having been paid to have sex?

Do you think she knows that there is no such thing as an entopic pregnancy?