19072 Members
14 Forums
40341 Topics
614109 Posts
Max Online: 830 @ Yesterday at 02:06 AM
|
|
|
#472117 - 01/20/10 04:35 PM
U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Sex Slave Trader
Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 1321
|
Discuss 
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/scott-brown-nude-in-cosmo
Senator Is the Centerfold
September 22, 2009 at 4:17PM By Ashley Womble
Long before he was a politician, the Republican candidate vying for Ted Kennedy’s U.S. Senate seat posed nude for the centerfold of Cosmo. Scott Brown won our “America’s Sexiest Man” contest and appeared in the June 1982 issue. In those days he was a 22-year-old law student at Boston College who was cramming for finals just days before stripping down for our photographer.
“Here at Cosmo we’ve had bachelors go on to be actors, models, and reality show stars, so we’re thrilled that one has gone on to become a politician,” says Kate White, Cosmo’s editor in chief. Obviously we know how to pick ’em. This particular bachelor has always had political ambitions and even admitted to being “a bit of a patriot” when we interviewed him.
Compared to some men in the GOP, this politician looks pretty damn good for his age. We bet he still has an amazing body underneath his suit and tie. There have been plenty of pics of our president running around without his shirt, so now that a precedent has been set, we’re hoping to see Scott shirtless again.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#472119 - 01/20/10 04:39 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch
Registered: 04/26/09
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
the Republican candidate vying for Ted Kennedy’s U.S. Senate seat
Ahem. It's the people's seat.
BTW, there must be something about that seat-- didn't Ted have a swimmer's body when he entered the senate, as well?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472120 - 01/20/10 05:03 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Sex Slave Trader
Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 1321
|
Quote:
Quote:
the Republican candidate vying for Ted Kennedy’s U.S. Senate seat
Ahem. It's the people's seat.
BTW, there must be something about that seat-- didn't Ted have a swimmer's body when he entered the senate, as well?
Staying in shape is one of the perks after selling your soul. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472121 - 01/20/10 05:17 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Gay For Pay
Registered: 01/13/07
Posts: 1011
|
The GOP definitely needs people who are willing to take their pants off long enough to know what they look like.
That whole turn over Roe v. Wade thing holds them down just as much as single-payer holds down the Democrats.
Scott Brown tries to find his daughters a hook-up: Click
Don't bother to watch the 1st video on that page. It's probably just that guy using his throat to jerk-off his tongue again. You gotta scroll down a little to see the funny video.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472124 - 01/20/10 08:52 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/23/04
Posts: 10321
|
He will be a Presidential candidate for sure. Someday people will look back on his election to this seat and the death of the present health care bill as a turning point.
I don't think it portends a return to Republican power as much as it says people are sick of the status quo. There will be a bloodletting of incumbents in the next general election.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472126 - 01/20/10 09:31 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 01/02/05
Posts: 5750
Loc: ATLANTIC CITY
|
Quote:
Yeah,too bad Mary Jo Kopechne wasn't as good of a swimmer.
"When I returned to the bridge, both mary jo and the cahhh were gone."
The American public and society in general is completely ignorant, stupid and lacking in wisdom. Status Quo? the fucking president hasnt even been in office more than a year, and ALL these fucking problems he is attemtping to solve are the result, by and large of the PREVIOUS Administrations 8 year run of ineptitude....I AM SERIOUS, HELLO FOLKS!?!?!? anyone home???
Obama's biggest mistake was promising all the shit he did when campaigning. Of course, there were literally too many topics and opportunities for improvement, and after a year, there is NO WAY in hell enough of these problems could be solved to satisfy the average registered idiot, regardless of party.
C'mon, the Debt and spending that everyone is going apeshit over is the DIRECT result of the previous 8 years under GW Bush, a president whom in 2001 inherited a SURPLUS budget that could have been balanced in perpetuity at that time if he had fucking done the right thing(s). NO ONE REMEMBERS this shit, it is amazing, it is like the previous 8 years didnt happen.....Oh fuck, I cant think about it anymore, it is too ridiculous.
How anyone can be outraged at Obama is beyond me, at least at this point....Blame who deserves the blame, GW Bush and, more importantly, that arrogant pissant DICK Cheney.
Folks, I USED to be a republican...I have NEVER voted for a Dem, ever....but I became and remain so disillusioned and SICK of the Republicans now, thanks to the hijacking of our party by the religious wackadoodles and fat Drug addicts like Rush Limberger ..... gahhhh i cant stand that I am affiliated with the same party as he is.....
But the fact is, the current state of things and problems REQUIRE the approach and tact that OBAMA and the dems can deliver, if they dont fuck it up or pull some shit. This election of Brown Scott only muddied the already putrid waters of our nation. NOTHING will get done or solved now....
_________________________
Are you gonna eat that?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472129 - 01/20/10 11:36 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Fucking Master
Registered: 04/16/09
Posts: 3703
Loc: Sleeping through my funeral
|
I thought this thread was going to about the former singer for Iskra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4p5nk3kc-s&feature=related
_________________________
Leave your mind open, receptive to the demons message.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472131 - 01/21/10 04:49 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 9113
Loc: red dirt state of mind
|
He is becoming the anti-obama, a clean cut, non-threatening rebulican, that speaks well, and is pro-choice.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472132 - 01/21/10 07:32 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 03/22/07
Posts: 5186
Loc: Joshua Tree National Park
|
If he makes Keith Olbermann hyperventilate he can't be all bad.
_________________________
I would eat Allie Sin's asshole until I got an emotion out of her.-Jerkules
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472133 - 01/21/10 10:24 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Rob Black's Crack Pipe
Registered: 10/02/09
Posts: 57
|
I would just like to say that he is butt-fucking ugly.
Politicians are a huge turn off in every way, the only guy I'd party with is Clinton.
_________________________
"Nothing is more exhilarating than philistine vulgarity."
-Nabokov
"I am a very stylish girl."
-Patricia Neal, Breakfast at Tiffany's
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472134 - 01/21/10 12:31 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Pervert
Registered: 08/05/05
Posts: 2116
Loc: Faber College
|
This is good. We need balance in Washington. It's very bad when one party has a stranglehold on both the Executive and Legislative branches of government. To make it even better this guy doesn't appear to be a religious wacko.
_________________________
It was a wonderful community with some very enjoyable members. But the vast majority were like German housewives circa 1943 prenteding that horrib;le smell wafting through their open windowsd was just the neighbors having a cookout..--Windsock
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472135 - 01/21/10 01:12 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Gay For Pay
Registered: 01/13/07
Posts: 1011
|
Quote:
It's very bad when one party has a stranglehold on both the Executive and Legislative branches of government.
Seriously, political parties don't represent unified ideologies. They're institutions groups can manipulate to obtain power. That whole health care reform bill, despite Obama's insistence that there are "other silvers in the drawer", that whole bill was the public option bill. All of the political capital gained in their defeat of Bush Jr. was expended towards the public option. Everything else, you had to dig to find out what was going on.
Little to no attention was given to National Health Exchanges which is now obviously the direction the country has to go in to reduce health care costs. Very little emphasis was placed on them in that bill. The only significant cost control measure in that entire bill was the public option. So, as health care costs continue to spiral, the public option becomes more and more the established answer. And, that's why liberals were so giddy about that bill. The fail back is the public option. And, when the public option gets big enough, it becomes single payer.
The public option didn't have very much support till the liberals started banging their head on Democrats to support it. I remember a news story when the liberals got 26 Senate votes in favor of the public option. It was a major victory for them. They went on to damn near get it passed.
But, to understand that, you've got to note that it's mostly moderates in the Democratic party. I saw a poll not too long ago where they looked at various polling. ~40% of the country is conservative, ~40% is moderate, and ~20% is liberal. Source: Click
Liberals are to the Democrats just like the religious right is to the Republicans.
And, it was shocking how much public support the liberals were able to muster up amongst all the confusion of health care reform. It's not clear how much the public supports the public option because if you subtly change the wording of your poll, the results differ dramatically. Because the results are based on such subtle wording changes, it indicates the public just don't understand the issue enough. But, they were able to get quite a bit of support.
When politicians actually have to go across the aisle to make a deal, it's one of the few places we have left in our political system that isn't dominated by financial interests. And, small groups can't as easily manipulate their party to achieve their ends.
When the party sets about trying to pass shit via party line votes, ignoring the other party, they run around talking shit about dropping financing for your next campaign, which basically means you'll lose. But, if they have to go across the aisle for votes, and are having trouble getting votes there, threats for cutting off financing don't make as much sense.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472136 - 01/21/10 01:32 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 03/11/07
Posts: 451
Loc: Houston
|
Burg, how's that kool aid taste? Politicians from EITHER party are self serving blood suckers that promise the world and deliver a bill for something you'll never get. Blaming a single branch of government is senseless too since no spending gets done without Congress and few bills survive a Presidential veto.
The last administration spent like they were democrats and the current one seems destined to outspend it, the final bill amounting to more than we can "tax those mean old rich folks" for. In general, a government solution is an ineffective, outdated, too heavily compromised, and watered done solution that works for few but costs ten times as much as it should regardless of who is "officially" in charge at the time.
_________________________
"I'm rich. I'm a strong, trained fighter. I own a gun. And I am completely...fucking ... psychotic." Kurt Lockwood ranting yet again
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472137 - 01/21/10 02:36 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Gay For Pay
Registered: 01/13/07
Posts: 1011
|
Quote:
The last administration spent like they were democrats and the current one seems destined to outspend it
This is something I need to look into. How much of Bush's over-spending was due to Iraq and Afghanistan? I've been wondering if mismanaging Iraq for the 1st 3 years of the occupation is the real, single most thing that sent Bush's budgets into extra-terrestrial territories. Mismanaging for 3 years just meant we'd have to pour money into Iraq another 3 years, all the while Afghanistan becoming more of a money pit we can't attend to. But, I need to look into that. Don't know if it's consistent with the numbers or not.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472138 - 01/22/10 04:23 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/03/03
Posts: 5849
Loc: TX, USA
|
Quote:
C'mon, the Debt and spending that everyone is going apeshit over is the DIRECT result of the previous 8 years under GW Bush
I disagree. The "big" spending chunk for economic recovery is TARP, that was debited against Bush (TARP is a Bush program). Obama's spending is in other areas, not economic recovery (UAW bailout at GM and Chrysler, etc). Even the few economic programs Obama has done that were actually effective proved to have too much cost/benefit for even Obama to continue (cash-for-clunkers, etc). Most of the deficit spending was entirely Obama's choice to not try to match spending to revenues.
Quote:
, a president whom in 2001 inherited a SURPLUS budget that could have been balanced in perpetuity at that time if he had fucking done the right thing(s).
Nonsense. The surplus was illusory, entirely the result of the Bubble-fueled tax receipts. There was never any chance it could be sustained for long as the first recession that came along would put an end to it ... which is exactly what happened a couple of months after Bush jr took office. The loss of that surplus is the one thing Bush jr *can't* be blamed for.
It's worth noting that in one year Obama has run up the deficit about 1/3 of Bush jr's, and jr's is heavily weighed down by the recession spending in 2008.
Quote:
How anyone can be outraged at Obama is beyond me, at least at this point...
Were you unemployed and unable to pay bills I think you'd completely understand why Brown was elected. Obama's sole priority has been the health-care bill: in nearly everything else - wars, domestic spying, economy - he's been content to carry over Bush jr era policies and programs.
When you're unemployed the _last_ thing you need is a law requiring you to spend $10k/year on insurance or pay a big fine. This seems not have occurred to anyone in Washington.
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472139 - 01/22/10 02:02 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Gay For Pay
Registered: 01/13/07
Posts: 1011
|
Quote:
I disagree. The "big" spending chunk for economic recovery is TARP, that was debited against Bush (TARP is a Bush program).
And, most of the TARP money has been paid back after the Bush years were over. So, that works against his record as it is in strict year-by-year accounting also.
Quote:
Most of the deficit spending was entirely Obama's choice to not try to match spending to revenues.
At Cato, I saw an interesting blog post whose bias that Obama's deficit problems are largely Bush's fault. But, what JRV said here is exactly what I left that post thinking about. Source: Click.
Quote:
The surplus was illusory, entirely the result of the Bubble-fueled tax receipts. There was never any chance it could be sustained for long as the first recession that came along would put an end to it ... which is exactly what happened a couple of months after Bush jr took office.
Exactly. People complain of short memories...
It is so completely annoying how Democrats entirely forget about the dot com bubble (that as we know now was hiding a real estate bubble) during the Clinton years. All their hub-bub about how great Clinton was because of the economy is 95% based on the dot com bubble. But, they never mention the internet.
Quote:
Quote:
How anyone can be outraged at Obama is beyond me, at least at this point...
Were you unemployed and unable to pay bills I think you'd completely understand why Brown was elected. Obama's sole priority has been the health-care bill:
More, non hyped since it's post-election, information is coming out of Massachusetts. From the reports, it seems to me like a lot of the angst was based on the cosmetic process issues surrounding health care reform. Nebraska getting the corn-husker deal. The new Louisiana Purchase. Big pharma cutting a deal with Obama so we can't import drugs from other countries where they're cheaper. Unions getting their exemption from the excise tax on cadillac health care plans.
But, the whole time I've been watching that bill, the cosmetic issues have always seemed like symptons of more serious problems. With better legislation, people don't have as much room to bitch how they should get a bunch of money thrown in their pocket to support it. Because it wasn't great legislation, everyone lined up in opposition to it and back room deals were handed out in order to garner support.
I don't think the masses in Massachusetts have an understanding of the economics behind that health care reform bill. I had to dig a lot to get what understanding I've managed to come to. Most people don't do that. But, when these problems bubble up and have consequences that even the average Joe can understand without having to look into anything, then you have a problem. It's like how Palin was such a mistake. She had no time to prepare to run for the presidency and because of that she made mistakes that were so obvious, every housewife could tell they were fuck-ups.
A professional politician should not be making mistakes that any moron who sees a headline flash across the screen can tell is just plain stupid.
Quote:
in nearly everything else - wars, domestic spying, economy - he's been content to carry over Bush jr era policies and programs.
In economic policy he did differ quite a bit with the stimulus bill. A Republican president would never structure economic stimulus such that the federal govt gets to arbitrarily cherry pick projects various private project they are going to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on. It reeks of the potential for corruption. Then, we get back the numbers of to what good the money was spent on and the numbers are complete bullshit. Things like some small town spent $40K on a lawn mower and it saved 5 jobs...
A Republican would just have done an entire across the board tax cut so the people could decide where the money gets spent.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472140 - 01/22/10 06:16 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 01/02/05
Posts: 5750
Loc: ATLANTIC CITY
|
I hate debating things like this on XPT, it is extremely difficult to construct well defined arguments and to unleash my formidable intellect and knowledge when I have a boner and want to look at and discuss whores, splooge and their consumption of it, however...... The late 90s/early 2000 Surplus(es) was/were neither illusory nor the single after effect of the Dot Cum bubble ... the recession that (briefly) followed was greatly exacerbated by 9/11, the effects of which were actually shaken off fairly quickly, so that the fiscal situation of the governement could have and should have remained positive, the budgets balanced (or not nearly as deficit heavy as they became) without the subsequent sinkholes of Iraq/Afgahanistan and the many other sinkholes of the republican nightmare, and the subsequent (now permanent) precipitous rise in gas prices that Cheney wanted took a large bite out of everyone's ass so that instead of some of the $$$ continuing on into the govt coffers, they went to Exxon et al The DOT cum bubble is greatly exagerated as being the primary power behind the surplus(es)....c'mon guys it is not that simple. And this Credit/Mortgage/Derivative crises IS/ARE the fault of the Republican Admin...the relaxing of regs and the push for aggressive investment was the tool to counter the effects of the 9/11 attack, so that the terrorists could not claim victory by throwing the economy in the tank. And that was correct to do, in 2002-2003, but the fucking thing is, Bush & Co. forgot to TURN it back off when the storm had passed, so that, in 2004, 2005 and 2006-2007, you had the naturally greedy fuckers on wall street and all over the country continuing to take advantage of the situation, thus bringing on the colossal mess that followed. Countrywide's Chief Executive Ogre, Angelo Mozzillo openly admitted that, what the governement allowed them to do after 9/11 to give the economy a jolt was like a painkiller, meant for shorterm use to weather a crisis....using it for 8 years after however, resulted in what we saw, an addict overdosing and nearly dying (I just HAD to stick an opiate reference in here somewhere  ). Ah, It is too esoteric and the math too cumbersome to regurgitate here, but the fact is, it is stupid to blast Obama just yet, it really is, NO ONE could (nor can probably) "FIX" what is wrong with this fucking country, at least not with the current apparatus. I cannot believe I am defending Obama, but that in itself is the greatest testament to just how fucked we are.... ...and why I am now going to watch my erstwhile pornographic albatross, the 5-guy cum filled asshole overload scene with Keri Sable from 2005...yes, it has come to that, what used to make me sick now fucking gets me going to my whore rolodex and speed dial, and nowadays I am imagining it is Holly Randall instead of Keri.... 
_________________________
Are you gonna eat that?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472141 - 01/22/10 07:56 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Sex Slave Trader
Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 1321
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472147 - 01/24/10 08:15 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch
Registered: 04/26/09
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
Quote:
A low-budget Traci Lords.
+1.
Again, where's the problem?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472148 - 01/25/10 06:15 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 9113
Loc: red dirt state of mind
|
The problem is she's married to a republican. You'll have to excuse the hooray for my team libbers, they are still in a state of shock and denial from last week.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472149 - 01/25/10 03:41 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Internet Tough Guy
Registered: 05/18/09
Posts: 890
Loc: Midwest / Florida
|
What escort agency will he use?
Gotta tell you I like this fucker, the negro in office has not done shit for me
_________________________
I want to Bust a nut in that bitches right eye
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472150 - 01/25/10 04:57 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch
Registered: 04/26/09
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
The problem is she's married to a republican.
So, she's perfect? Wow! Congrats Senator!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472151 - 01/25/10 05:25 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Gay For Pay
Registered: 01/13/07
Posts: 1011
|
Quote:
The problem is she's married to a republican. You'll have to excuse the hooray for my team libbers, they are still in a state of shock and denial from last week.
You gotta love it when people evaluate politics based simply on party labels. I guarantee you 95% of them that are pissed they lost Massachusetts have no idea how a national health exchange could cut this country's medical costs.
Then, just a step above that, you have those who are familiar with the ideas behind the issues, but still manage to have just about everything that's good falls into the bucket when they're party had the presidency. And, just about everything that's bad falls into the bucket when the other party had the presidency. I was going to find Burglar some links to how there was a big controversy with hearings in Congress that credit default swaps weren't regulated during Clinton's presidency. And the laws passed during that time enabling people with no money to buy houses because not doing so would be discriminating against them. But meh, just never got around to it. And yes, for the team libbers, Coke belongs in this paragraph as well.
The one thing that would mean the most towards educating children about our political system, if we could just let them know that how the economy is doing is far from necessarily being the result of who is president, that would go a long way towards cutting through a lot of the bullshit rhetoric we have to listen to in politics. There'd be nobody out there to believe it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472152 - 01/26/10 05:40 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 9113
Loc: red dirt state of mind
|
I've never been around so many people who viewed absolutely the entire world in black and white and I grew up in the south. Hell I've had run ins with klan members that had more open minds than the liberals on this board.
I'd be happy if they taught kids things like how to make a budget or how credit cards worked. I believe that alone would do more for our country than just about anything.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472153 - 01/26/10 07:43 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 4856
Loc: The 4th International
|
I completely agree with you.
All those so-called intellectual liberals, libertarians and reactionary forces should be sent off to the work camps, where they will be taught to understand the revolutionary spirit of the working class.
_________________________
The only thing you got that I want, is your suffering.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472155 - 01/26/10 12:25 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 9113
Loc: red dirt state of mind
|
This going after the banks thing is just more smoke and mirrors from the Obama administration. They are attempting to distract people from what the government is actually doing and spending. Fine, go after the fat cats on Wall Street, but let's not forget the fat cats in Washington DC while we're at it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472156 - 01/26/10 12:47 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 03/05/07
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
Staying in shape is one of the perks after selling your soul.
spoken like a true fat ass. i bet you are hairier than he is.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472157 - 01/27/10 03:22 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 01/02/05
Posts: 5750
Loc: ATLANTIC CITY
|
Well all i can say is I am not a liberal, I've just grown sick of politics and my fomer party...I feel the Repugs have become mentally unhinged and are now insane...the real Boner-fide reason Mccain lost was the entire Sarah Palin fiasco. If she was not the reason he lost, then she was at least the final nail in his coffin. But that is exactly what I am talking about: McPAIN IS the actual reason MCPAIN lost. He is a total whack job, his years in the camps put the zap on his already fucked up brain, and THIS is what my party wants me to vote for???? I guarantee you if McPAIN had been elected we'd be in a state of anarchy while he lobbed missles at North Korea, Iran and France.
I currently live in Connecticut and MAssachuestts, so I saw first hand what happened with this whole Senate bullshit race. I cringed at both candidates, for entirely different reasons; Martha COKE-ly was nothing more than a Hillary Scott Clinton wannabe, Brown Scott is a typical state senator simpleton who has now risen to his level of incompetence. NEITHER is what the state or the country needs most. And this special election had EVERYONE in the state receiving robo-calls 6 times a day from various people advocating one candidate or the other. The final straw for me was when Curt Schilling called me and interupted a nice Boob-fuck with my former stripper-neighbor who came by to visit and bring me Brownies (and she needed 450 bucks to fix her car.)
Sell the house, Sell the car, sell the kids, I am not coming back. it's over, I am moving to Sweden. I will lose 60% of all my wealth right off the bat just by stepping foot in the country and signing over my citizenship, BUT I will live in a country where everyone stays inside to keep warm by fucking, and I will be able to get blow jobs from 18 year old blonde gorgeous female college students while getting my hair buzzed at the local barbershop. Smorgasboard of debauchery here i come.
I shall return when Jesse "Bunny Ranch" Ventura is elected.
_________________________
Are you gonna eat that?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472158 - 01/27/10 11:26 AM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Gay For Pay
Registered: 01/13/07
Posts: 1011
|
Quote:
Well all i can say is I am not a liberal, I've just grown sick of politics and my fomer party...
Most Democrats aren't liberals. I posted that poll earlier in this thread that shows only 20% of the nation is liberal.
Quote:
I feel the Repugs have become mentally unhinged and are now insane...
I hear that a lot from people who think they know about politics, but are really just propagandists. They think because they used to blindly follow one party, but now blindly follow the other party that that means they are independent. It shows a small level of thinking above Oprah Winfrey who refused to let anyone but Obama on her show, but is just them picking a different horse to root for and gamble on. It's not really looking at how complex and fascinating history is.
Quote:
the real Boner-fide reason Mccain lost was the entire Sarah Palin fiasco.
Yeah, Palin was stupid. Going into the party conventions, McCain was only a point and a half behind in the national polls. But, McCain was convinced he was gonna lose, and was gonna do any desperate thing to hood-wink independents into getting excited about his campaign. He saw how excited the populace was about a young upstart who had no idea what he was doing and said, "hey, Palin's one of those!!".
When his first crazy idea about getting Lieberman as his vice-president was summarily rejected, he want to crazy idea plan B. And because she's as much a right wing nut-case as all the people who were livid about Lieberman, they were like "Yeah!!!!". But, McCain himself wanted to swoon the independents, not the right wing nut-jobs.
If McCain would have picked Guilliani, I can't imagine he would have lost. You look at the smooth and naive youngster Obama who's never accomplished anything in politics other than getting himself elected. And, his VP, the blabber mouthed Biden. So, you got those two fruit loops vs. two distinguished statemen who have fought for controversial ideas that have succeeded, I can't imagine the people wouldn't have eventually come to their senses and voted for the statesmen.
My whole theory about that campaign was that Obama was a fad that would pass and his numbers would go down like a hot air balloon. But then McCain picked Palin and she stole Obama's thunder. So, it's not until now, after he's president, that we see the Obama fad passing. Unfortunately, we're stuck with him for awhile.
But, if you wanna pick your political party based on how nutty the candidates are. How about Al Gore? He hid his goofiness until just after the election. At which point he ran around Florida jockeying for re-counts in only the districts he thought would benefit him. So much for fair elections. Gore turned that into a circus where you had to look at ballot under a microscope under varying rules. Then, he goes on to make a movie based on pseudo-science. Which winning a Nobel for only made the thing more obscene. The Nobel committee made their colors even more obvious later, when they gave Obama a Nobel that even he said he didn't deserve. These days, Gore travels the planet prostelyzing environmental issues. While at home, he lives in a mansion that eats more energy than some small towns and goes out on the lake in a giant, gas-devouring boat.
How about Kerry? This guy was the most liberal senator in Congress at the time, in a country where only 20% of us are liberal. He'd been in Congress 20 years and didn't have his name on a single major piece of legislation. John Stewart to this day calls him something like "long lips Kerry" because of his verbose, inability to communicate. The same thing he was called "the flipper" for in the campaign. Hell, the guy lost to an unpopular sitting president. And, let's not forget his decision to make a plank of his campaign his military service. When in reality, he just signed up because he knew he was gonna be drafted anyway. Then he used his privileged officer status to get the hell out of Vietnam as fast as he could. So then later, he decides to use that experience to convince people he should be president of the United States of America.
Palin was just exposed to the national scene too early. It's a lot of pressure. Possibly she wouldn't look like such a goof-ball if they'd left her in Alaska for another 10 years before bringing her on the national scene. And, not only did they bring her out too soon, but they didn't give her any time to prepare either.
Clinton was brilliant, but look at most Democratic candidates. One of our last 3 good presidents was a Democrat, and a conservative Democrat at that. Two of our last 3 good presidents were Republicans, Bush Sr and Reagan, and not very moderate ones at that.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472160 - 01/27/10 06:11 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Sex Slave Trader
Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 1321
|
Quote:
I just like him because she doesn't.................
Which makes what you say pointless. Unless you have a legitimate argument, then fuck off. You only like him because I don't? I never gave my opinion of him. No I don't like him because of his stance on women's issues. I didn't even know his wife is the local channel 5 reporter until only a few weeks ago. Aside from his stance on abortion, I have no problem with him. Ted Kennedy was an horrible person. But he was a great politician. My family owes a lot to the Kennedy family because most of them wouldn't be living here if it wasn't for John Kennedy.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472161 - 01/27/10 06:22 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
My family owes a lot to the Kennedy family because most of them wouldn't be living here if it wasn't for John Kennedy.
So they're either mobsters, Cuban or descended from one of his mistresses.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472163 - 01/27/10 07:20 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Sex Slave Trader
Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 1321
|
Quote:
Quote:
My family owes a lot to the Kennedy family because most of them wouldn't be living here if it wasn't for John Kennedy.
So they're either mobsters, Cuban or descended from one of his mistresses.
Okay. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#472164 - 01/27/10 07:22 PM
Re: U.S. Senator Scott Brown
|
Sex Slave Trader
Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 1321
|
Quote:
Quote:
what you say pointless.
Homework:
Look in the mirror, make eye contact with the retarded fuck face staring back @ you and say that quote to it (ya "it", I went there, bitch.) until you feel like it deserves a good ol' Irish headbutt or two x ten. I'd ask you to report back to me but...what YOU say pointless.
So everyone on this dying cancer  known as XPT should all take your advice, huh? What we all say here is pointless!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
698
Guests and
6
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
