For all of their hyperbole and histrionics about how animals are just like people, they seem pretty accepting of the notion that if you can't find a good home for an animal it is an acceptable option to kill them. Unless PETA also supports killing homeless people or even just people who can't find "good" homes--whatever that means (I guess we should kill everybody in low income housing projects)? Sort of undermines their arguments that lab rats and farm animals have the same rights as human children, huh?

I wonder why they seem so accepting of killing homeless pets. Hmmmmm. PETA couldn't be involved in killing animals who don't have a "good" home could they?

I heard Sasha Grey is a philosophical idiot savant, I wonder how she would justify this apparent ethical contradiction.