Quote:

Hey guys, just curious who has the best production values? This isn't a thread about the fucking per se. It's about behind the camera. I hate to say this but Jim Holliday seems to have good production quality(even though his porn is weak). Vivid's production is weak, I thought they would spend more on it. Remember this isn't about what goes on in front of the camera, rather behind it. Lighting, Camera Angles, Editing, etc. So what are your takes.... Who does a good job behind the camera and who doesn't and why.





Great post. I think both are just as important as each other, you could have the hottest sex but fuck it up with poor lighting and horrible direction and then again you could have boring sex (every devon scene) and it have top class hollywood camera work and lighting. I am a big fan of gonzo, i think its probably the easiest porn to shoot (but what do i know) and you don't need to spend a lot of money on behind the scenes stuff. Jules jordan does a good job and i have seen some of mike south (i think thats right) POV stuff and that was good too. I think vivid spends the most on their stuff but its just awful to watch and im not talking about the boring sex, they try too hard to make it look like a normal hollywood type movie. If i wanted to watch a Hollywood movie then i would watch a holly fucking wood movie, if i want to watch people fucking then i will watch fucking porn, all these distant shots and getting props involved in scenes and elaborate backdrops, its so un necessary and the worst part about it is the hottest women only work for these companies so all this hot sex goes to waste because you can't jerk off to the shit. Great fucking post though, great topic.


Edited by smelly monkey (08/17/04 06:11 AM)
_________________________
“Jesus said, hey baby, its all good" Wayne Lewis