It seems to me that she "preys on" former adult talent far more than the industry ever did.
What does she do? Give them a couple of hundred bucks? Find them a job as a secretary?
Then she uses them and their images in her crusade.
In so doing, she degrades them and turns them into charity cases--far worse, in my eyes, than actually being in the adult industry would be.
Her arguments are couched in the lowest and simplest of terms and are clearly the stuff of propaganda.
If she were smart, she wouldn't discredit herself from the onset with such overt nonsense and would use the facts in a calm and pointed manner. Instead, we get amateurish / defamatory psychological diagnoses--i.e., "porn addicts"--etc.
She gets all upset that Oprah's people wouldn't interview her.
Why should they? She simply makes a fool of herself and her cause...
IMHO...
Edited by roadiewarriorx (11/29/09 11:14 AM)