Notice how he completely missed the refusal of the GISS to release its data, even though a FOIA has been filed for some time, or skated over the destroyed data from the CRU. You know, the data they used to actually build their climate models with, those models they are touting as a reason to spend trillions of our dollars.

If they want to see skepticism abate there needs to be more transparency with their climate models. When I see this sort of thing it automatically makes me suspicious and I have to ask myself: Why are the CRU and GISS afraid to open their climate models for peer review? I'm not much on conspiracies in general, but I know it when I smell a rat.

I didn't realize Potholer was a name caller before, that changes the way I thought about him, he loses credibility with me and respect from me, for that alone.