Quote:

Looks like they updated it to 22 now? I wish they would say if it does include gay porn stars, real porn stars or what? It's not like the media doesn't fuck with porn enough.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2009334074_porn13.html



The Seattle Times is running stale news.

The county health department has backed away from the numbers entirely - apparently the guy didn't realize AIM does testing for the public too, and reports *every* confirmed HIV+ result (as they are legally required to do). The dude simply ASSuMEd that every HIV+ report filed was an active performer.

AIM says that this is the first HIV+ result they've reported from someone performing in porn, and that the other HIV+ results they've reported were either civilians, prospective performers, or such.

AIM might be BS-ing of course, but the county health department was definitely pulling the numbers out of their butt.
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock