Quote:

I didn't read the "studio's official plot description". Which "studio" are we talking about here?



Well, I did. And is the question as to which studio really a genuine question? You really don't know, or can't guess?

I'll answer your question with a question...what studio do YOU think might write a plot description for a DVD, other than the studio releasing said DVD? You are the one who brought the DVD title in question up, ergo you should know what studio wrote the plot description. (Hint: It might be Jules Jordan Video.)


Quote:

I didn't insult the reviewer; I merely mentioned his daily occupation. But thanks for the idea.




More back-of-the-classroom, detention hall humor, as usual. I'm sure it will get you kudos from your posse of like-minded compatriots here. But here's the fact: you called him "The Great Shelf-Stocker himself" in a post above. Lemme guess...that's a sincere compliment, not an insult. At least that's what the other dudes in detention hall would say, anyway, right? Nudge nudge, wink wink. Geddit?


Quote:

To describe all my posts as slanderous and sarcastic, you must have read every single one of them. Nothing else to do than spending all day at a forum, reading posts of one particular poster?



You are partially correct. I should have stated every one of our posts that I have *bothered* to read. No way I'd read 2700-plus posts by anyone, for any reason.

But again, your typical back-of-the-classroom, detention hall humor falls flat. Why? Because the very idea of someone who has WRITTEN over 2700 posts claiming, in the finest tradition of juvenile facetiousness, that someone ELSE has too much time on his or her hands is, at best, utterly ludicrous. The irony is so thick, one could cut it with a knife.

Quote:

In my opinion, the true misogynist is husband Steve, who watches as his wife gets degraded on a weekly/daily basis by a bunch of cum-dumpers. For money, nonetheless.



Let's analyze this "opinion" a second.

1.) I CLEARLY enjoy ALL the scenes on my own web site (over which we have full control) and MOST of the scenes in my pro work (over which I have little control). And by "clearly", I mean just that...it's obvious that I love it and that I am not faking my orgasms. Yet, according to your thoughtful analysis, my husband allowing me to do what I enjoy doing as an exhibitionist - and his own enjoyment of it as both a participant as well as a voyeur - is "degrading" to me? Huh? That's a good one.

2.) I won't do anything in the pro work that I don't enjoy in my real-life sex life....choking, spitting, hair-pulling and anything else degrading to women or, for that matter, to men, either. Yet in your analysis, by NOT doing these things and by doing only those things I ENJOY, I am being "degraded"? Huh? Interesting.

3.) The reader is to believe that, despite the fact that I refuse to take shit from or even give serious countenance to any misogynists here on XPT that, somehow, I am rather incongruously married to a man who hates women? For almost 20 years? And that I somehow look happy and fulfilled in ALL of my photos and ALL of my videos released since 1998, despite living for 20 years with a "misogynist"? Quite a few people in the porn world have met Steve and would attest that he is the type of guy who would never, EVER speak in a degrading manner to ANY woman the way you and those of your ilk here...yet HE is a "misogynist"? And not you? Huh? Come again?

Here are some facts:

1.) Steve and I and have been swingers since 1995...3 years before I went online with my own site, and 13 years before I started doing pro work on the side. This fact is and always has been clearly stated on my profile here, my web site and absolutely every single interview or bio I've ever done, anywhere, whether online or on DVD. This, by definition, means that Steve gets plenty of "action", too. He simply doesn't show it on camera except for POV shots due to the fact that he is more of a voyeur than an exhibitionist despite having a big, porn-perfect dick (check it out on my site and see for yourself) and a body that is FAR more fit than most porn actors. I am the exhibitionist, not him. He is the voyeur, not me. A perfect match. Want to know why I prefer well-hung men? Check out the POV scenes with Steve on my site...you'll see. But what if you DON'T want to see for a fact that he's not "gay" or "bi"? Then by all means, DON'T look at the stuff on my site with him or other select female friends. It'll only disappoint you.

2.) If anyone thinks Steve is gay or bi for enjoying watching me with other men (and women), then they must think they themselves are gay or bi for enjoying porn, because the "heart" of watching porn is the same as watching live sex...it's voyeurism. The fact that we are married and close-knit makes the voyeuristic experience more intense and personal for him and the exhibitionistic experience more intense and personal for me, rather than a detached and impersonal experience, as is the case with watching porn only on DVD or the web. Those who do NOT understand that are simply not swingers...they don't get it because they CAN'T get it. Ergo, their opinions about our marriage (or that of any other swingers) is irrelevant. Any further dialogue would be akin to talking with the tax man about poetry...a waste of time.

3.) The racist comments don't even deserve a response. To assume that all black people (or Asians, or whatever) are all the same would be the same thing as stating that all Caucasian people are the same. And, hey, perhaps it's just me...but I think there is a quantitative difference between say, Steve Hawking, Jerry Springer, George Bush, and Micheal Moore, for examples. If all of members of one race are not the same, then logic dictates that not every member of another race is all the same. (To say nothing of those whose racial background is mixed on one or more levels.) This is a cold, hard truth of the variety that always makes dyed-in-the-wool racists of ANY race furious.

There have been other humorous charges here which always make me laugh, among them that I am a "typical drug using performer" (fact: I am a marathon runner, cyclist, triathlete and occasional figure competitor), that I am a "typical stupid porn chick (fact: I have an M.A., as does Steve), that I "must" be the bread-winner in the family (fact: Steve is, and in fact that financial base is EXACTLY why I can do what I do without worry and enjoy it, rather than have it be "work").

But does it really matter what I say in answer to these silly, adolescent charges? No, not to you and those of your ilk. After all, you're not really writing to me, you're writing to and for your online buddies here, to see who can top who in the game if "lets go back to high school!" But at least you now have some more fuel for your (wholly imaginary) fire, and the ensuing posts from you and your compatriots will continue to bring more traffic to my site. I can just sit back and not post a single thing for weeks yet again, just as I have done in the past, and let you do the work for me. So, for that, thanks in advance.

_________________________
Janet Mason www.janet-exposed.com