Quote:

---

does janet escort?

---

Quote:

---

Another question for Janet (or anyone who understands the mindset): if she prefers "hung blacks", why does she bother with the white middle-aged husband. Obviously, she's the moneymaker of the two. He just holds the camera and passes out towels. It can't be love. She humiliates him as much as a man can possibly be humiliated on a regular basis.

---

Quote:

---

She is based in the LA area and is very selective on who she will see..

---

Quote:

---

She also dislikes smokers...

---

*Waves @ Newports*

Quote:

---

Hey Janet, a few members on another thread called top 5 females you'd like to see do a bukkake have you at the top of our lists.Would you do it?

---

Quote:

---

Hey Janet, a few members on another thread called top 5 females you'd like to see do a bukkake have you at the top of our lists.Would you do it?

---

Yes, JizzyJay, I would. I have a huge, very genuine cum fetish and have done a couple of smaller bukkakes on my site (clips & DVDs). The biggest of the two had 15 guys in it (one guy came twice, so I took 16 loads) and I LOVED it...so doing one with a larger group would be hot!

Quote:

---

So...I took matters into my own hands, got Jim's direct phone # from Nelson X and just called him about an hour ago.

---

She seems to be desperate for work

Quote:

---

She seems to be desperate for work

---

Soon at The Bunny Ranch/Craig's List/BodyMiracle.....

Janet Mason

Quote:

---

I believe it. Janet Mason is someone that you can't trust. People like that turn around and stab you in the back in a heartbeat. But one day it will all even out my friends.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I believe it. Janet Mason is someone that you can't trust. People like that turn around and stab you in the back in a heartbeat. But one day it will all even out my friends.

---

Please elaborate. And post pics.

---

Quote:

---

I believe it. Janet Mason is someone that you can't trust. People like that turn around and stab you in the back in a heartbeat. But one day it will all even out my friends.

---

Quote:

---

prerogative - self-evident - copious - defunct - modus operandi - a nonstop campaign of slanderous attacks - self-restraint - histrionic - facetious - stridently - Again, this is a classic case of narcissistic egomania run amok. - undoubtedly unsurprised - self-appointed vigilante of verbiage - unmitigated - shrill, bombastic - hyperbole-ridden - über-praise - muster - ad infinitum - sheer audacity

---

Quote:

---

I just don't work with known tranny-fuckers, and I don't do bondage.

---

Quote:

---

Next scene opens with some good R&B playing while Janet drives up her huge gas guzzler into a car shop, some repairs evidently needed. OMG is this lady having a mid life crisis or something, lol. She's trying to dress all ghetto is seems with a skin tight skirt'n'top a flashy jacket, a hat turned at an angle and finally some bling around her neck. Janet is here to slick her ride out, she's even trying the lingo too, lol.

---

Quote:

---

Edit to add:
You know The Bunny Ranch is the next stop when you're made fun of by no other than bobo-ONE himself.

Quote:

---

Next scene opens with some good R&B playing while Janet drives up her huge gas guzzler into a car shop, some repairs evidently needed. OMG is this lady having a mid life crisis or something, lol. She's trying to dress all ghetto is seems with a skin tight skirt'n'top a flashy jacket, a hat turned at an angle and finally some bling around her neck. Janet is here to slick her ride out, she's even trying the lingo too, lol.

---

< link >

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I just don't work with known tranny-fuckers, and I don't do bondage.

---

OK, noted.
Where does this fit in with the scene you did with Prince Yahshua for Dirty Rotten Motherfuckers 3? And is Donny Long on your no-list as well?

---

Quote:

---

How do all you people know who has done tranny scenes? I watch porn but I never know who has done a tranny or gay scene in the past. It could happen to be because I never watch any of those movies.

I really wonder how it could be that so many people are so knowledgeable about this.

---

Quote:

---

By this, Christian means that he is upset because I put him on my "no" list...meaning I will not shoot with him again. Why? Nothing personal. It's simply because I don't shoot with guys who do tranny and/or gay work. That is my prerogative and that is self-evident.

---

Janet, do you shoot with non-talent, porn whore stalkers? Or are they on your no list, too?

Quote:

---

That was the actual plot of the scene, not a comment on her. Her character was a recently divorced woman having a mid-life crisis and trying to dress/act younger.

---

Tenley, thank you for pointing that out. You'd think that someone who has been here as long as Freestylah (over 2700 posts and counting...wow!) would know that this is a plot description rather than an "opinion" or "review", and that both the script and wardrobe are - as usual - dictated and provided by the studio, not the performer. It is, after all, rather self-evident....even to those who do NOT hang out on porn boards every single day. But guys like this are so desperate to criticize everything that others post that they sometimes forget themselves in their mad rush to "insult". Just as they don't realize how every would-be insulting post they make actually drives more memberships to my site...which is surely not their intent at all.

As Woody Allen says, there's no such thing as bad press. I've actually had new members and DVD customers write and say that they only checked out my site because of some of the over-the-top, juvenile comments made on this thread by the usual suspects. I don't even have to do any promo myself, or even respond directly to them...they do all the work for me by high-fiving each other verbally here. And that, by any definition, is just plain funny.

Quote:

---

...would know that this is a plot description rather than an "opinion" or "review",

---

Quote:

---

....Just as they don't realize how every would-be insulting post they make actually drives more memberships to my site...which is surely not their intent at all.

---

Quote:

---

Um, wrong. It's from a review by The Great Shelf-Stocker himself, bono-ONE. Click the link and you would have known.

---

Quote:

---

Sorry to burst your bubble, but you don't know shit about my intentions. So please refrain from implying you do. It makes you look less awesome!

---

Quote:

---

A "review" that is a near-verbatim edit of the studio's official plot description is not a "review" at all.

---

I didn't read the "studio's official plot description". Which "studio" are we talking about here?

Quote:

---

To say nothing of the irony of you assigning deep significance to a "review" from a reviewer you insult for the quality of his reviews.

---

Quote:

---

And your intentions are clear in every single thing you post, all of which is slanderous and sarcastic in the extreme

---

Quote:

---

You may think of yourself and your motivations as mysterious, but you are an open-book misogynist.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I believe it. Janet Mason is someone that you can't trust. People like that turn around and stab you in the back in a heartbeat. But one day it will all even out my friends.

---

By this, Christian means that he is upset because I put him on my "no" list...meaning I will not shoot with him again. Why? Nothing personal. It's simply because I don't shoot with guys who do tranny and/or gay work. That is my prerogative and that is self-evident.

Christian apparently thinks otherwise. Christian seems to be under the impression that everyone has to shoot with him if he wants to shoot with them and, if they don't, it's personal.

Unfortunately, that's not reality. At least, not on Planet Earth.

Anyone who reads or has read Christian's copious postings on numerous forums over the years (Naughty America's Country Club being a prime example) and his own blog (which is now defunct) already knows that this is no surprise at all. In point of fact, this is Christian's modus operandi. Simply stated, no performer in the industry is allowed to disagree with Christian on anything at all, to do anything he wouldn't do, or to NOT do something he would do. If they dare to do so - even once - Christian immediately starts a nonstop campaign of slanderous attacks on that person that show no sign of self-restraint or shame, to say nothing of no sense of respect for himself, others or, for that matter, even simple facts.

That being said, this post is just the latest in this endless series of histrionic (and usually facetious) personal attacks on other performers. I'm not the first and I will certainly not be the last.

To those who care, here's the backstory....

About six months ago or so, Christian and I shot a scene together for Naughty America. It was a very good scene and we got on very well. Honestly. It was fun!

Soon after that, I found out about his tranny work and actually saw a clip of him fucking a tranny in the ass. Now, fucking guys who fuck trannies or other men is just not something I'm comfortable with. I did not slam or judge Christian for his tranny and/or gay work. "To each his own" is my motto. If he gets off on trannies, so be it...I don't care. And if he does it just for money (which would be hard to believe considering how often and stridently he goes on and on about the need for chemistry in a scene), so be it, I don't care.

But I DO care who I shoot with and what their sexual habits are. As such, I told my agent that, although I personally liked Christian and enjoyed our one-and-only scene together, I had to put him on my "no" list...just as I do with ANYONE whom I know for a fact does tranny or gay work. It was not personal.

Anyway...back to the cause of Christian's post...

A couple of week ago, I was booked by my agent for what I was told was a standard-issue B/G scene this coming Monday. Then, late yesterday afternoon, I was informed that it was not a standard B/G scene but in fact a hardcore bondage scene, which I don't do, and that the scene was with Christian who, as noted already, is and has been on my "no" list for many months now. It was a simple (and rare) mistake on my agent's part, no big deal, but I don't do bondage and my very small "no" list exists for a reason. Hence, the scene was canceled by the director based on my agent's error in booking me for a scene in a genre I don't do with a partner I won't work with. End of story.

Or so one would think.

Apparently, Christian did not know that he was on my "no" list until yesterday, when this situation arose. Nor did he know that I don't do bondage scenes at all...never have, never will.

Worse yet, he seems not to care. Apparently, Christian is under the impression that I am obligated to do any scene he feels I should do. Apparently, Christian feels that NOT working with guys who do tranny work and NOT doing bondage scenes - both facts my agent knew ahead of time, but simply forgot - is, um, "stabbing him in the back".

Question: Is Christian my agent and is that, therefore, the reason he is angry?

Answer: No.

Question: Does Christian have any other authority in my life, then, whether personal or professional, whatsoever?

Answer: No...unless one considers Christian's imagination as a valid realm of "authority". (I don't.)

Question: Are Christian and I even friends....or were we, perhaps, once close friends at some time in the past, only to have a falling out at some point?

Answer: No. We simply had a single good scene together when I first started doing pro work. That's it. No more and no less.

Again, this is a classic case of narcissistic egomania run amok. But anyone who has read ANY of Christian's posts just about anywhere is undoubtedly wholly unsurprised by this reaction on his part. In Christian's online world, either he's raving about how great something is, or he's going off on someone like a self-appointed vigilante of verbiage. It's never objective...it's always subjective and personal in the extreme, completely over-the-top and, in the final analysis, totally self-serving. Always. Without fail.

The reader will also note that nowhere have I ever slandered Christian for his tranny work. Not here at XPT, nor any other forum, period. Nor will I ever do so. The fact is, I LIKED Christian...I simply choose not to work with him for reasons of personal comfort. But it appears that since I had the unmitigated gall to elect not work with him because I don't do bondage and I don't work with guys who do tranny or gay stuff, I am now the latest (but certainly not the last) entry in Christian's Ever-Expanding Shit List, aka the "People Who Don't Do What Christian Wants Them To Do When He Wants Them To Do It List".

Need proof? Check out the Naughty America forums. Or go to a web archive site and read his now-defunct blog. 80% of it is shrill, bombastic attacks on anyone and everyone that does not pass Christian's personal muster of whatever standard he's on about that day. The remaining 20% is equally hyperbole-ridden über-praise for the few people that DO pass his muster. And while we're on that topic, for additional perspective on this would-be slanderous remark from Christian, be sure to read his blog entry about ME, which he posted right after our shoot and in which he goes on and on, ad infinitum, about how "awesome" and "great" I am.

Until, of course, I stop doing what he wants me to. After all...who am I to make my own decisions? God forbid. The sheer audacity of some people! And hell, I'm just a woman, to boot! That just ain't right.

Coda: I will not be dragged into a pissing contest with you, Christian. This post is simply a factual response to your utterly ludicrous and wholly false accusation. The truth is that I had no "beef" with you at all. I just don't work with known tranny-fuckers, and I don't do bondage. That's it. No more, no less. And the bottom line is that no matter what you think about that, it just doesn't matter. This is, quite simply, not ABOUT you. And that is all I have to say on the matter. You could have emailed or spoken with me directly, but instead you chose your usual approach of going out on forums and starting yet another slander campaign against yet another person. The problem is, people who know you don't buy it. Surely a man of your self-proclaimed intellect can grasp the simplicity and clarity of this situation. You should be ashamed of yourself but I have the feeling that, instead, you are going to get even nastier still. Just be aware of the fact that I will not respond. I'm over it. If you're not, well, that is your problem and I'm genuinely sorry that you feel it necessary to make it one for yourself.

---

Quote:

---

= my hubby doesn't want me to work with c3x

---

Quote:

---

Janet, if you and Desi Foxx were to mudwrestle who would win? What would your price point be for holding her head under, for say 3-4 minutes?

---

Quote:

---

I didn't read the "studio's official plot description". Which "studio" are we talking about here?

---

Quote:

---

I didn't insult the reviewer; I merely mentioned his daily occupation. But thanks for the idea.

---

Quote:

---

To describe all my posts as slanderous and sarcastic, you must have read every single one of them. Nothing else to do than spending all day at a forum, reading posts of one particular poster?

---

Quote:

---

In my opinion, the true misogynist is husband Steve, who watches as his wife gets degraded on a weekly/daily basis by a bunch of cum-dumpers. For money, nonetheless.

---

Let's analyze this "opinion" a second.

1.) I CLEARLY enjoy ALL the scenes on my own web site (over which we have full control) and MOST of the scenes in my pro work (over which I have little control). And by "clearly", I mean just that...it's obvious that I love it and that I am not faking my orgasms. Yet, according to your thoughtful analysis, my husband allowing me to do what I enjoy doing as an exhibitionist - and his own enjoyment of it as both a participant as well as a voyeur - is "degrading" to me? Huh? That's a good one.

2.) I won't do anything in the pro work that I don't enjoy in my real-life sex life....choking, spitting, hair-pulling and anything else degrading to women or, for that matter, to men, either. Yet in your analysis, by NOT doing these things and by doing only those things I ENJOY, I am being "degraded"? Huh? Interesting.

3.) The reader is to believe that, despite the fact that I refuse to take shit from or even give serious countenance to any misogynists here on XPT that, somehow, I am rather incongruously married to a man who hates women? For almost 20 years? And that I somehow look happy and fulfilled in ALL of my photos and ALL of my videos released since 1998, despite living for 20 years with a "misogynist"? Quite a few people in the porn world have met Steve and would attest that he is the type of guy who would never, EVER speak in a degrading manner to ANY woman the way you and those of your ilk here...yet HE is a "misogynist"? And not you? Huh? Come again?

Here are some facts:

1.) Steve and I and have been swingers since 1995...3 years before I went online with my own site, and 13 years before I started doing pro work on the side. This fact is and always has been clearly stated on my profile here, my web site and absolutely every single interview or bio I've ever done, anywhere, whether online or on DVD. This, by definition, means that Steve gets plenty of "action", too. He simply doesn't show it on camera except for POV shots due to the fact that he is more of a voyeur than an exhibitionist despite having a big, porn-perfect dick (check it out on my site and see for yourself) and a body that is FAR more fit than most porn actors. I am the exhibitionist, not him. He is the voyeur, not me. A perfect match. Want to know why I prefer well-hung men? Check out the POV scenes with Steve on my site...you'll see. But what if you DON'T want to see for a fact that he's not "gay" or "bi"? Then by all means, DON'T look at the stuff on my site with him or other select female friends. It'll only disappoint you.

2.) If anyone thinks Steve is gay or bi for enjoying watching me with other men (and women), then they must think they themselves are gay or bi for enjoying porn, because the "heart" of watching porn is the same as watching live sex...it's voyeurism. The fact that we are married and close-knit makes the voyeuristic experience more intense and personal for him and the exhibitionistic experience more intense and personal for me, rather than a detached and impersonal experience, as is the case with watching porn only on DVD or the web. Those who do NOT understand that are simply not swingers...they don't get it because they CAN'T get it. Ergo, their opinions about our marriage (or that of any other swingers) is irrelevant. Any further dialogue would be akin to talking with the tax man about poetry...a waste of time.

3.) The racist comments don't even deserve a response. To assume that all black people (or Asians, or whatever) are all the same would be the same thing as stating that all Caucasian people are the same. And, hey, perhaps it's just me...but I think there is a quantitative difference between say, Steve Hawking, Jerry Springer, George Bush, and Micheal Moore, for examples. If all of members of one race are not the same, then logic dictates that not every member of another race is all the same. (To say nothing of those whose racial background is mixed on one or more levels.) This is a cold, hard truth of the variety that always makes dyed-in-the-wool racists of ANY race furious.

There have been other humorous charges here which always make me laugh, among them that I am a "typical drug using performer" (fact: I am a marathon runner, cyclist, triathlete and occasional figure competitor), that I am a "typical stupid porn chick (fact: I have an M.A., as does Steve), that I "must" be the bread-winner in the family (fact: Steve is, and in fact that financial base is EXACTLY why I can do what I do without worry and enjoy it, rather than have it be "work").

But does it really matter what I say in answer to these silly, adolescent charges? No, not to you and those of your ilk. After all, you're not really writing to me, you're writing to and for your online buddies here, to see who can top who in the game if "lets go back to high school!" But at least you now have some more fuel for your (wholly imaginary) fire, and the ensuing posts from you and your compatriots will continue to bring more traffic to my site. I can just sit back and not post a single thing for weeks yet again, just as I have done in the past, and let you do the work for me. So, for that, thanks in advance.

Quote:

---

Jesus Janet is that the first installation of "Whore and Piece" ? Phew !

---

No shit!

Burg, you have competition in Aisle #4.

Quote:

---

2.) If anyone thinks Steve is gay or bi for enjoying watching me with other men (and women), then they must think they themselves are gay or bi for enjoying porn, because the "heart" of watching porn is the same as watching live sex...

---

Quote:

---

You are the one who brought the DVD title in question up, ergo you should know what studio wrote the plot description.

---

Quote:

---

You are partially correct. I should have stated every one of our posts that I have *bothered* to read.

---

So, how many of my posts did you actually read? 2% would make about 55 posts. Nice sample to base a judgment on.
And apparently, you have been bothered enough to reply to a number of them.

re. the race issue: I hope you noticed that I can't be bothered with that.

Quote:

---

Well just to state. I think Janet is definately marketing herself and doing research. By her posts on several boards it seems to me that she is trying to see what it is that perverts like me would like to watch her do. And if she is marketing herself then Bravo.

---

No, I am not "marketing" myself or my activities...the things you see on my site are the same things I enjoy off-camera, too, which is why you can tell that I'm really having a great time on the site. No 'work', just pure fun sex, hence no burnout at all after 11 years. It just so happens that you are one of those who enjoys the exact same things as I do.

Quote:

---

I for one look for everything she has done professionally and on her site. I have been a long time member on her site and I love her venturing out into the Pro world.

---

Quote:

---

The reason I love all of the posts about Janet by the regulars on here is that it markets her. Negative, sarcastic posts generate more curiosity about her and more revenue and more popularity. So I guess to me, in my book, it looks like Janet is really using you guys. It's actually funny.

---

I agree, the sheer irony of it is funny...very funny. But no, I'm not "using" the sideline-sitting pot-shot takers who neither perform, direct, write, film, photograph nor, for that matter, even work as lube boys or jizz-moppers. I came out here on XPT clean as a whistle and they started the high school-esque trash talking right away. I had no idea that was coming...but in no time I realized that their juvenile comments, wild accusations and ludicrous assumptions were driving more quality traffic - that is to say, more traffic with a higher-than-usual new signup conversion rate - than anything else. I have even stated so here, yet the would-be snide remarks still flow with no sign of flagging. Which, of course, means I get to sit back and reap the benefit while these guys continue to whip themselves and each other up into a frenzy of hate.

Yep...that's funny, alright.

Sit tight for that American Bukkake or Gokkun scene, sweetie...I'd LOVE to do one (or both!) and if it is "in the cards", it will happen!

Quote:

---

Sit tight for that American Bukkake or Gokkun scene, sweetie...I'd LOVE to do one (or both!) and if it is "in the cards", it will happen!

---

Quote:

---

Well just to state. I think Janet is definately marketing herself and doing research. By her posts on several boards it seems to me that she is trying to see what it is that perverts like me would like to watch her do. And if she is marketing herself then Bravo. I for one look for everything she has done professionally and on her site. I have been a long time member on her site and I love her venturing out into the Pro world. I've always had fantasies of her getting fucked by Lexington Steele, Mandingo, Jake Steed and other big blacks in tht pro world. I've also had fantasies of watching her do American Bukkake and now my focus has turned to watching her do American Gokkun.

---

So you're just another wanna-be cuckold living vicariously through her husband?

Quote:

---

There's just no way Janet's black co-stars in this clip have criminal records. I wonder if the role of her son is being played by her actual son. The great dialogue could have been penned by Samuel Beckett:

http://www.xvideos.com/video82869/son_watches_mom_suck_cocks

---