Quote:

Your statistics and your methodology are both idiotic.

Of course my statistics were "bunk" I used your data to demonstrate how uselss snapshot statistics are with a small sample size in a dynamic environment.




Wonderful, now you're using a completely different criteria (web hits) to make a comparison which is totally unrelated to my point. Any kooky nutball (like yourself) could put up a comment about Bristol Palin on their website and it'll show up in your results. What does this prove, genius? I was talking about a comparison of the number of actual news articles and how Bristol Palin is still as big a news story as Ashley Biden will apparently ever be, even in the midst of a drug scandal. I gave you statistics for the past month as well as the current volume of daily hits, both proving my point. But go ahead and ignore all of that. Honestly, it doesn't matter since the Ashley Biden story apparently is going to keep getting ignored until it fades away, while new stories about the Palins will continue to be written from now until the next set of Presidential primaries.
_________________________
"Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars." - Martin Luther King, Jr.