Who the fuck did Arizona, Wisconsin, and Maryland blow to get into the tournament this year?

Everyone makes this too damn complicated with their RPI's and this index and that scale. Forget all the strength of schedule and conference ranking crap, you can use that to filter teams out later. First criteria is how did a certain team play throughout the year. How many games did they win? How many games did they lose? If they did not win at least 20 but still lost at least 10 they do not belong in the tournament period. The ONLY exception is if they win their conference tournament and get the automatic bid. That stops these jokes like Arizona and Wisconsin getting in with 19-12 and 19-13 records. I could find at least 20 teams with records like this that don't even get bids to the NIT, why should one get a bid to the NCAA. Not only did Wisconsin have a 19-12 record but their best out of conference win was against one of the five teams in the ACC that didn't make the NCAA.

After that look at conference records. All teams that finished below .500 and did not win their conference tournament do not belong in the field. That is you Maryland. I don't care who played, I don't even care who you beat. You lost more games in your conference than you won, you are a tournament fraud and should be in the NIT with Baylor who has practically the same resume that you do.