Quote:

Ms. Buchanan said that in 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court stated in Miller v. California that materials are obscene if they satisfy a three part test:

(1) The average person, applying contemporary community standards, finds that the material taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; and

(2) The average person, applying contemporary community standards, finds that the material depicts sexual conduct in patently offensive manner; and

(3) A reasonable person, viewing the material as a whole, finds that the material lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.


Where's that "Jesus Fucking Christ" pic when I need it... I didn't even know that obscenity was that vague and broad. The porn industry does need to be smacked down for various reasons (drugs, STDs, injuries due to unsafe practices, mental illnesses, ad nauseum), but violating the First Amendment with this ridiculously broad bullshit is not the way to do it.