He was their father for 16 years. But what does it say about him that he now wanted a DNA test after 16 years? Does he tell them I am no longer your father? The judge even said this ruling is for the children, not the parents. If this was found out within a year or two of the twins' birth, then no he shouldn't pay support. But he's been their father for 16 years and he's been raising them and supporting them for 16 years. He should continue paying support and for college like every other father does. I'm not siding with the mother at all, if that's what any of you will turn around and say. I'm siding with the kids who now learned not only is their father not their biological father, but they also learned their father is a scumbag who asked for a DNA test after 16 years and all because of money.